The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using s trap

1

Shotgun Proteomics of Cellular and Exosomal Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation for shotgun proteomic analysis of cellular and exosomal proteins was performed using S-traps (https://www.protifi.com/s-trap/) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting peptides were analyzed by high resolution LC-MS/MS. Briefly, peptides were autosampled onto a 200 × 0.1 mm (Jupiter 3 micron, 300A), self-packed analytical column coupled directly to a Q-exactive plus mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher) using a nanoelectrospray source and resolved using an aqueous to organic gradient. Both the intact masses (MS) and fragmentation patterns (MS/MS) of the peptides were collected in a data dependent manner utilizing dynamic exclusion to maximize depth of proteome coverage. The resulting peptide MS/MS spectral data were searched against the rat protein database to which common contaminants and reversed versions of each protein were appended using Sequest (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1016/1044-0305%2894%2980016-2). The resulting identifications were filtered and collated together at the protein level using Scaffold (http://www.proteomesoftware.com/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detailed Protocol for Protein Identification using Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eluents from Apex or FLAG purifications were prepared for analysis via S-trap trypsin digests using manufacturer’s protocol (S-Trap – ProtiFi). The peptides were separated on a self-packed 100 μm × 20 cm reversed phase (Phenomonex - Jupiter 3 micron, 300A) column from which peptides were ionized directly via nano-electrospray into an Exploris 480 (Thermo-Fisher) mass spectrometer. Both full-scan and peptide fragmentation (MS/MS) were collected over the course of a 70-minute aqueous to organic gradient elution in a data-dependent manner using dynamic exclusion to reduce redundancy of peptide acquisition. Resulting MS/MS spectra were searched using SEQUEST 59 (link) against a human database containing common contaminants and reversed copies of each entry. Resulting identifications were filtered to a 5% false-discovery threshold, collated back to the protein level, and compared across samples using Scaffold (Proteome Software). Filtered total spectral count values were used for fold-change comparisons and p-value estimations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized Proteomics Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Avertin (Tribromoethanol; Sigma-Aldrich, 250 mg/kg i.p.) was used to anesthetize the animals. Each sample (i.e., brains removed from mice) was dissolved in 100 μL of 5% SDS, reduced with 20 mM dithiothreitol in 50 mM NH4HCO3 for 10 min at 95 °C, and alkylated with 40 mM iodoacetamide in 50 mM NH4HCO3 for 30 min under the light blocking. S-TRAP™ (Protifi) was used for the fast and reproducible preparation of proteomics samples. Denatured, non-digested proteins were bound to the S-TRAP™. Each sample was incubated overnight at 37 °C with 12.5 μg sequencing grade modified trypsin/LysC (Promega) in 50 mM NH4HCO3 buffer (pH 7.8) on S-TRAP column. Eluted peptide sample was dried down and quantified. The samples were re-suspended in 0.1% formic acid and dried for LC-MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

S-Trap Micro Kit Protein Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An S-trap™ micro kit, including S-trap™ and included buffers (Protifi, Huntington, NY, USA), was used for sample processing. Briefly, each sample was reduced with 10 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine in a thermomixer for 15 minutes set at 55°C at 1200 rpm, followed by alkylation with 20 mM methyl methanethiosulfonate in a thermomixer for 30 minutes at room temperature at 1200 rpm. 27.5% phosphoric acid was used to acidify the proteins, then samples were diluted with 165 μL of S-trap™ binding buffer (100 mM TEAB, 90% methanol with pH 7.1). The samples were then loaded onto S-trap™ micro spin columns and washed three times with S-trap™ binding buffer. 20 μg of Trypsin-LysC in 50 mM TEAB in water solution was added to the top of the S-trap™ and then incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. Peptides were eluted serially with 50 mM TEAB in water, 0.2% aqueous formic acid, and 50% acetonitrile containing 0.2% formic acid. Combined peptide elutions were vacuum centrifuged to dryness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fractionation and Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen samples (250 mg) were fractionated as above, nuclear pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of 5% SDS containing PBS and cytoplasmic fractions were mixed 1:1 with 10% SDS solution to give a final 5% SDS concentration. Proteins were digested using S-Trap (Protifi) and samples cleared of DNA/RNA by heating to 95 °C and sonication. Samples were then reduced with TCEP (5 mM final concentration, 15 min incubation at 55 °C) and alkylated with Iodoacetamide (10 mM final concentration, 10 min incubation at RT). Resulting samples were acidified with 12% Phosphoric acid (final concentration of 2.5%, v/v), followed by addition of 6 vol. of loading buffer (90% methanol, 100 mM TEAB, pH 8) and loaded onto S-Trap cartridges. Cartridges were spun at 4000×g for 30 s and washed with 90% loading buffer × 3 and flow-through discarded. Retained proteins were trypsin digested (10:1 protein: trypsin), in 50 mM TEAB, pH8.5 for 3 h at 47 °C.
Peptides were eluted, first, with 50 µl of 50 mM TEAB, followed by 50 µl of 0.2% formic acid and finally with 50 µl of 50% acetonitrile and 0.2% formic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Analysis of HT-29 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HT-29 cells were plated in 10-well plates (120,000 cells/well) in 10 ml of regular growth medium. 2 h later cells were treated with either DMSO or MS023 (5 µM). After 5 days cells were trypsinazed, washed with PBS, and pellets were stored in − 80 °C until processing. Frozen HT-29 cell pellets were lysed in 5% Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, #L3771) in 50 mM Tris pH 7.4 and 100 µg of total protein were taken for the tryptic digest. The samples volume was adjusted to 50 µl with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, digested with trypsin using S-trap (Protifi, Huntington NY, USA)60 (link) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, vacuum dried and stored in − 80 °C prior to fractionation. All chemicals were from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA, unless stated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Biomolecule Extraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Michigan, USA) unless otherwise stated. For sample homogenization, two types of micropestles were acquired, one from Sigma Aldrich (#BAF199230001) and one Optima Inc., Glencoe, IL, USA, (#320302). Filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) [37 (link),38 (link)] was conducted on Microcon® Centrifugal Filters (30 kDa molecular cut-off, Merck KGaA #MRCF0R030, purchased through Sigma Aldrich. For bead-based sample preparation, ferromagnetic beads with MagReSyn® Amine functional groups (ReSyn Biosciences, Gauteng, South Africa) were used. For sample preparation using suspension trapping, S-Trap [51 (link)] micro-cartridges with a binding capacity of <100 µg total protein were purchased from ProtiFi (Farmingdale, NY, USA, #CO2-micro-80).
The total protein concentration was determined using a reducing-agent-compatible Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, #23250) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Schirmer Strip Protein Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were stored at −80 °C until preparation was initiated. By the beginning of the preparation, the samples were thawed and Schirmer strips incubated for 20 min in lysis buffer (5% SDS, 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate [TEAB]). Samples were prepared according to the S-Trap™ Micro spin column digestion protocol from ProtiFi (ProtiFi, Huntington, NY, USA) as previously described [8 (link)].
The reduction in disulphide bonds, alkylation of cysteines, and digestion in S-Trap micro columns were performed as described in a recent article [8 (link)]. The elution of peptides, recovery of hydrophobic peptides, and measurement of peptide concentration were performed as previously described [8 (link),30 (link)]. Each sample was dried in a vacuum centrifuge and stored at −80 °C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Rab11A Immunoprecipitation and nLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals used for preparation of nanoflow liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (nLC–MS/MS) samples were of sequencing grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise stated. The Rab11A IP eluate was separated by SDS–PAGE using NuPAGE 1DE System (NuPAGE Novex 4–12% bis–tris 1.5-mm gels, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Visualization of separated proteins was performed by overnight staining with Coomassie blue G-250 solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The in-gel tryptic digestion followed by peptide extraction from the gel bands was performed according to previously published protocols67 (link). The extracted peptides were desalted using Poros Oligo R3 RP (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA) P200 columns with C18 3 M plug (3 M Bioanalytical Technologies, St. Paul, MN) prior to nLC–MS/MS analysis. The Rab11A IP input samples were processed using the suspension trap (S-Trap, Protifi, Huntington, NY)68 (link) mini spin column digestion protocol with minor modifications. The Rab11A IP input samples were first mixed with 20% SDS to the final concentration of 5% SDS following the manufacturer’s procedure. The peptide solution was pooled, lyophilized, and desalted prior to nLC–MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

TMT-based Proteomic Analysis of Primary Human CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TMT-based whole cell proteomic analysis of primary human CD4+ T cells, resting or activated cells were washed with ice-cold PBS with Ca/Mg pH 7.4 (Sigma) and frozen at −80°C. Samples were lysed, reduced, alkylated, digested and labelled with TMT reagents (Thermo Scientific) using either iST-NHS (PreOmics GmbH; time course and single time point experiments) or S-Trap (Protifi; SBP-ΔLNGFR control experiment) sample preparation kits, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Typically, 5e6 resting or 1e6 activated cells were used for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!