The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Agilent genomic dna labeling kit plus

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS is a laboratory product designed for the labeling of genomic DNA samples. It provides the necessary reagents and components to enable the fluorescent labeling of DNA for use in various genomic analysis applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using agilent genomic dna labeling kit plus

1

aCGH Genetic Variation Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aCGH was detected genetic variations, including deletions and duplications using the Agilent Human Whole Genome CGH 8 × 60 K microarray (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Test and reference DNA samples were labeled by random priming with either Cy3-dUTP or Cy5-dUTP using the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Agilent Technologies). All slides were scanned on an Agilent DNA microarray scanner. Data were obtained using the Agilent Feature Extraction Software 9 (Agilent Technologies) and analyzed the ADM-2 statistical algorithms with 6.0 sensitivity thresholds as described previously [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic Imbalances in iPSC Clones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic imbalances in lymphocytes from the patient and in derived iPS clones 12 and 32 at passages p11 and p12, respectively, were investigated by array-CGH with 1M oligonucleotide arrays (Agilent Technologies). Array hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 0.5 μg of genomic DNA was fluorescently labeled with the Agilent Genomic DNA labeling kit PLUS (Agilent Technologies). Male human genomic DNA was used as a reference. Cy5-dUTP patient DNA and sex-matched reference DNA labeled with Cy3-dUTP were denatured and preannealed with Cot-1 DNA and Agilent blocking reagent before hybridization for 40 h, with rotation at 20 rpm, at 65 °C in a rotating hybridization oven (Agilent Technologies). The slides were then washed and scanned on an Agilent Microarray Scanner. The captured images were processed with Feature Extraction 10.7.3.1 software and data analysis was performed with Cytogenomics 3.0.1.1 software. Copy number variations (CNVs) were considered significant if they were defined by three or more contiguous oligonucleotides spanning at least 2 kb and were not identified in the Database of Genomic Variants. The Genome Browser used to analyze gene content was hg19, Build37 (http://genome.ucsc.edu/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome-wide Copy Number Variation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array-based CGH was performed using an Agilent Human Whole Genome CGH 8 × 60 K microarray (Agilent Technologies). Labeling and hybridization were performed using protocols provided by the manufacturer (Cancer Sci. 2013; 104; 631-638). Briefly, 0.5 μg of test or reference DNA was digested with Alu I and Rsa I (Promega, Madison, WI) and purified with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (QIAGEN). Test and reference DNA samples were labeled by random priming with either Cy3-dUTP or Cy5-dUTP using the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Agilent Technologies). Following the labeling reaction, individually labeled test and reference samples were combined and concentrated using Amicon Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA). After denaturing the probe and preannealing it to human Cot-1 DNA, samples were hybridized at 65°C and 20 rpm rotation for 24 hours in a DNA Microarray Hybridization Oven (Agilent Technologies). Samples were washed in wash buffer 1 at room temperature for 5 minutes and wash buffer 2 at 37°C for 1 minute using Agilent Oligo CGH washes. All slides were scanned on an Agilent DNA microarray scanner. Data were obtained using Agilent Feature Extraction Software 9 and analyzed with Agilent CGH Analytics Version 6.5 software using the ADM-2 statistical algorithms with 6.0 sensitivity thresholds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic DNA Isolation and Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation and labeling of genomic DNA was performed as described previously [17 (link),18 (link)]. Briefly, genomic DNA (gDNA) from bone marrow (BM) aspirate specimens was isolated using the Autopure extractor (Qiagen/Gentra, Valenica, CA). 500 ng of genomic DNA was digested with Alu and RsaI restriction enzymes for 2 hours at 37°C. Digested genomic DNA fragments from patients and reference DNA with neutral copy number (human female DNA, Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) were labeled with Cy5-dUTP and Cy3-dUTP, respectively, using the Agilent Genomic DNA labeling kit plus (Agilent Technologies, Polo Alto, CA). Labeled DNA was purified using Micron YM-30 columns (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and the volume was adjusted by 1 x Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) to 20 μl. Target yield and specific activity were quantified using Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington DE)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Genomic DNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was quantified by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop ND1000, NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware USA). Integrity of DNA was assessed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. Non-amplification labeling of DNA (direct method) was obtained following the ‘Agilent Oligonucleotide Array-Based CGH for Genomic DNA Analysis’ protocol Version 4.0 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, California USA. p/n G4410-90010). 500 ng of experimental and pool female reference genomic DNA samples were fragmented in a restriction digestion step. Digestion was confirmed and evaluated by DNA 7500 Bioanalyzer assay. Cyanine 3-dUTP and cyanine 5-dUTP were used for fluorescent labeling of test and reference digested gDNAs respectively, using the ‘Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS’ (Agilent p/n 5188-5309) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Labeled DNA was hybridized with Human Genome CGH Microarray 44K (Agilent p/n G4426B-014950) containing 43,000+ coding and noncoding human sequences. Arrays were scanned in an Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent G2565BA) according to the manufacturer's protocol and data extracted using Agilent Feature Extraction Software 9.5.3.1 following the Agilent protocol CGH-v4_95_Feb07 (‘Lowess Only’ normalization correction dye bias method instead of ‘Linear Only’) and the QC Metric Set CGH_QCMT_Feb08.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Profiling via gcCGH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All gcCGH tests were performed, analyzed and validated based on the protocols described previously [26] (link), [27] (link). In brief, all DNA samples were assessed for genomic DNA concentration and purity. Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to assess the quality of the genomic DNA samples. The test DNA (3 µg) and reference DNA (3 µg, pooled normal human male or female DNAs were used as reference DNA; purchased from Promega, Madison, WI) were digested with AluI and RsaI (Promega), and then labeled using the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The individually labeled test and reference samples were then purified using Microcon YM-30 filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Following purification, the appropriately labeled test DNA and reference DNA were mixed together and hybridized to the custom gcCGH array. The hybridization was followed by four washing steps, and slides were scanned on an Agilent Microarray Scanner G2565BA with 5-µm resolution. Captured images were assessed with Feature Extraction Software, version 9.5 (Agilent), and the data were then imported into Agilent CGH Analytics 3.2.5 software for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genome-wide DNA Copy Number Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA was labeled according to the Agilent Technologies protocol. For each tumor sample and gender-matched pooled normal control DNA from Promega (Human Genomic DNA), 500 ng of DNA was fragmented by heating. The tumor DNA and the control DNA were enzymatically labeled using an Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Agilent, 5188–5309). The tumor samples were labeled with ULS-Cy5 and the control DNA with ULS-Cy3, and then hybridized to 244 K Human Whole-Genome arrays (G441B) from Agilent at 65°C for 48 h in a rotating chamber at 20 rpm.
After washing, the slides were scanned with an Agilent G2505B DNA Microarray Scanner at a resolution of 5 µm, using default parameters. The acquisition of signals from the resulting scanned images and normalization were performed with Feature Extraction v9.5 software (Agilent Technologies), using default parameters. The normalized data were recentralized using a custom in-house script and then analyzed with CGH Analytics v3.4.40 software, using the ADM-2 segmentation method with a threshold setting of 6. The probes were mapped on the human genome build 36 (UCSC hg18, March 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome-wide Copy Number Variation Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aCGH detected genetic variations, including deletions and duplications, using the Agilent Human Whole Genome CGH 8 × 60 K microarray (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Test and reference DNA samples were labeled by random priming with either Cyanine 3 labeled analog of deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) or Cy5-dUTP using the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Agilent Technologies). All slides were scanned on an Agilent DNA microarray scanner. Data were obtained using Agilent Feature Extraction Software 9 (Agilent Technologies), which was used to analyze the ADM-2 statistical algorithms with 6.0 sensitivity thresholds, as described previously.19 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Genomic Analysis of HCC21 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from HCC21 cells and the original tumor. The Agilent human 44 K CGH microarray (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with an average probe spatial resolution of ∼ 35 kb was utilized. Genomic DNA at 1 μg was labelled by the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Agilent Technologies). The hybridized array was scanned by an Agilent Microarray Scanner and data were analysed by Agilent Feature Extraction 9.1 followed by computation and normalization using CGH Analytics v3.4. Putative chromosome copy number loss was defined by intervals of two or more adjacent probes with log2 ratios suggestive of a deletion when compared with the log2 ratios of adjoining probes. The Quality-Weighted Interval Score algorithm (ADM2) with a value of 6.0 was used to compute and assist the identification of aberrations for a given sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP-Seq Analysis of H3K4me3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formaldehyde crosslinking and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed with primary antibodies against histone H3K4me3 (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) using a Magna ChIP™ A chromatin immunoprecipitation kit (EMD Millipore). Sheared by sonication and purified, immunoprecipitated DNA and input DNA were amplified by a GenomePlex® Complete Whole Genome Amplification kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Amplified immunoprecipitated DNA and input DNA samples were labeled with cyanine 3-dUTP and cyanine 5-dUTP, respectively, using an Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit Plus (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The labeled DNA samples were purified using Amicon Ultra-0.5 30 kDa columns (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and eluted with 22 μL of 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA buffer, pH 8.0. The labeled immunoprecipitated DNA and input DNA were co-hybridized to Agilent Mouse 2 × 105 K CpG Island Microarrays according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Microarrays were scanned on an Agilent DNA microarray scanner and the resulting images were analyzed with Agilent Feature Extraction Software (Version 10.7.3). The data files were loaded into the ArrayTrack database [37 (link)] for Lowess normalization, calculation of the ratio of immunoprecipitated/input DNA, and further statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!