The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ltq orbitrap xl etd

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

The LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD is a high-performance mass spectrometer designed for advanced proteomics and metabolomics research. It combines a linear ion trap (LTQ) with a high-resolution Orbitrap mass analyzer and Electron Transfer Dissociation (ETD) capability. The instrument provides accurate mass measurements and advanced fragmentation techniques for the analysis of complex biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using ltq orbitrap xl etd

1

Reanalysis of Human CRC Proteomics Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS-based proteomics data from studies of human colorectal cancer were selected for reanalysis from public repositories included in ProteomeXchange such as PRIDE and jPOST, and from the CPTAC data portal. These databases were queried for human CRC and the resulting hits were filtered based on the following criteria- i) label-free DDA studies, where no post-translational modification (PTM)-enrichment had been performed; ii) experiments performed on Thermo Fisher Scientific instruments (LTQ Orbitrap, LTQ Orbitrap Elite, LTQ Orbitrap Velos, LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD, LTQ-Orbitrap XL ETD, Orbitrap Fusion and Q-Exactive); and iii) availability of detailed sample metadata in the original publication, or after contacting the original submitters. As a result, 10 datasets from PRIDE, one dataset each from jPOST and one from the CPTAC data portal were downloaded. The details of these datasets are available in Table 1. It is important to highlight that, although a small number of additional public datasets generated using other proteomics approaches were available, the 12 chosen datasets represented the vast majority of the relevant CRC public proteomics datasets. All datasets were manually curated and the corresponding information was encoded in a SDRF (Sample Data Relationship File), linking the MS raw data to the biological conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Shotgun Proteome Analysis via Nano-LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An UltiMate 3000 nanoLC pump (Dionex Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and a LTQ orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for shotgun proteome analysis of LC‐MS/MS. The dried samples were dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile/water (0.1 : 5 : 95, v/v/v) and injected into the spray needle column (Reprosil Pur C18‐AQ 3 μm, 100 μm inner diameter, 650 mm length, approximately 5 μm tip inner diameter). Peptide separation in the column was achieved via linear gradient elution using the mixture of two mobile phases (A) acetic acid/dimethylsulfoxide/water (0.05:4:96, v/v/v) and (B) acetic acid/dimethylsulfoxide/ACN (0.05:4:96, v/v/v) at the total flow rate of 500 nL·min−1 [(A) + (B) = 100%; (B) 0–0% in 3 min, (B) 0–45% in 240 min, (B) 45–80% in 5 min, (B) 80–80% in 5 min, (B) 0–0% in 25 min]. The separated peptides were sequentially ionized via electrospray mode at 2600 V and injected into an Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for detection as peptide ions, followed by sequential injection of the top 10 signal peaks into a linear ion trap mass spectrometer to acquire the product ion mass spectrum by collision‐induced dissociation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteomic analysis was carried out as described by Romero-Gavilán et al. [25 (link)], with minor variations. Briefly, the eluted protein was digested in-solution, following the FASP protocol established by Wisnewski et al. [26 (link)]. The obtained peptides were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid. The samples were analysed with nano-scale liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-MS/MS) by loading them onto a nanoACQUITY UPLC system connected online to an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Electron, Bremen, Germany). Each material was analysed in quadruplicate. Progenesis software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle, UK) was employed to perform differential protein analysis as described before [25 (link)]. The protein classification by functions was carried out using the DAVID Go annotation programme (https://David.ncifcrf.gov/) and PANTHER classification system (http://www.pantherdb.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Analysis of Tardigrade Stress Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heat soluble proteomics was conducted as previously described [30 (link)]. Briefly, approximately 3000 individuals were collected from the wild and cleaned as described above and homogenized using BioMasher II (Nippi) in PBS (Nippon Gene) on ice with protease inhibitors (Roche). The lysate was heated at 92 °C for 20 min, and the soluble fraction was collected by taking the supernatant after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 20 min. Proteins were digested with trypsin, and tryptic peptides were separated and identified with an UltiMate 3000 nanoLC pump (Dionex Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA, USA). Corresponding peptide sequences were retrieved from six frame translation data of our initial genome assembly using MASCOT software (Matrix Science) [79 (link)]. Candidates were further screened with the following conditions: (1) lack of conservation in other tardigrades or metazoans and (2) high mRNA expression (TPM > 100) in the tun state. We then predicted the structural features using the Fold Index [80 (link)] and DISOPRED [81 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteome Analysis by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample for proteome analysis was dissolved with 12 µL of 0.5% acetic acid 5% acetonitrile, and 5 µL of the solution was loaded on hand-made spray needle column (Reprosil-Pur C18 materials, 100 µm i.d. Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany, 5 µm tip i.d., 130 mm length) using a HTC-PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). The peptide fragments in the samples were separated through the column by reversed phase chromatography of linear gradient mode using UltiMate 3000 nanoLC Pump (Dionex Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). As the mobile phases, (A) acetic acid/water (0.5:100, v/v), (B) acetic acid/acetonitrile (0.5:100, v/v) and (C) acetic acid/dimethyl sulfoxide (0.5:100, v/v) were mixed keeping the flow rate of 500 nL/min. The composition was changed as follow: (A) + (B) = 96%, (C) = 4%, (B) 0–4% (0–5 min), 4–24% (5–65 min), 24–76% (65–70 min), 76% (70–80 min), and 0% (80.1–120 min). The separated peptides were ionized at 2400 V by positive electrospray method, injected into LTQ orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA) and detected as peptide ions (scan range: m/z300–1500, mass resolution: 60000 at m/z 400). Top 10 peaks of multiple charged peptide ions were subjected to collision-induced dissociation (isolation width: 2, normalized collision energy: 35 V, activation Q: 0.25, activation time: 30 s) to identify the amino acid sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Tryptic Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-dried tryptic peptides were prepared for MS analysis as described previously [29 ]. Samples were analysed on a LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were initially bound to C8 Captraps (Michrom Bioresources) before being eluted using a 25 min acetonitrile gradient (5– 35 % acetonitrile). During the gradient peptides were continually separated using a ‘Magic C18’ [200 Å(1 Å = 0.1 nm), 5 µm bead, Michrom Bioresources] fused silica nanospray column. Precursor masses were scanned using the following settings: analyser, FTMS (Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometer); mass range, normal; resolution, 60000; scan type, positive; data type, centroid; and scan ranges, 200–2000 m/z. The top seven masses from the precursor scan were selected for data-dependent acquisition. Data-dependent scan settings were the following: analyser, ion trap; mass range, normal; scan rate, normal; and data type, centroid. Charge state screening and monoisotopic precursor selection were enabled. Unassigned charge states and masses with a charge state of one were not analysed. The ‘data-dependent decision tree’ option was enabled as previously described [33 (link)], allowing for fragmentation of peptides using CID (collision-induced dissociation) or ETD (electron transfer dissociation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry Protocol for Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Low resolution mass spectral data
were analyzed using a Finnigan MAT LCQ spectrometer with MS/MS and
ESI probe, utilizing XCalibur software. High resolution mass spectral
data were analyzed using an Ultimate 3000 RSL HPLC (Thermo Fisher
Scientific Inc., MA) and an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD using a flow injection
method, with a flow rate of 5 μL/min. The HPLC flow is interfaced
with the mass spectrometer using the Electrospray source (Thermo Fisher
Scientific Inc., MA). Mass spectra were obtained over a range of 100 < m/z < 1000. Data were analyzed using
XCalibur software (Version 2.0.7, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

LC-ESI-MS Analysis of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-ESI-MS and LC-ESI-MS-MS analyses were done on a LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) equipped with standard ESI ion source. 5 μL of sample was injected at a flow rate of 50 μL/min in 80% ACN/H2O with 0.1% FA by Ultimate 3000 RSLC system from Dionex (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA). The conditions for full-scan MS are as follows: mass range m/z 0-6000 and resolution 60,000 at m/z 400. The target ions were sequentially isolated for MS2 by LTQ. Electrospray voltage was maintained at 4 kV and capillary temperature was set at 275 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Using SILAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed using an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to a NanoLC-2D (Eksigent), and proteins were identified with ProLuCID (55 (link)), using parameters as previously reported (56 (link)). SILAC ratio was calculated using CImage (57 (link)). Full SILAC results are available in the MassIVE database under accession number MSV000084474 (https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5P95Q) (58 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ICE-based Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The freshly thawed samples were treated with deionized water or normal saline directly before the analysis. All samples were analyzed using the ICE technique and an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) mass spectrometer as described elsewhere [14 (link)]. Briefly, the sample was placed inside a lab-made disposable cartridge (made from consumables provided by IDEX Health & Science LLC., Oak Harbor, WA, USA and GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) attached to the ESI interface of a mass spectrometer. The solvent flow (90% v/v methanol, 0.1% v/v acetic acid) extracts the analytes from the samples and delivers them into the ion source, while a glass microfiber filter inside the cartage protects the ESI needle from clogging. Mass spectra were acquired at the FTMS mass resolution set at 30,000 (FWHM at m/z 400 Da) for m/z values ranging from 500 to 1000 in the negative and positive modes, consecutively (30 s per polarity, 16 segments total). After the acquisition the ion source was washed with the solvent until the intensity of the signal decreased by at least 2 orders of magnitude from the level at the end of acquisition to avoid cross-contamination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!