The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using microsoft excel 2016

1

Examining Factors Influencing Premenstrual Syndrome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For descriptive statistics, we performed various statistical calculations, including minimum, maximum, mean (± standard deviation), and median (interquartile range) to provide characterization. The normality test was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Based on the results, for examining the relationships between the factors, we employed Spearman correlation analysis and Pearson chi-square test to determine the impact of the influencing factors (PSS, GHQ-12, IPAQ-SF) of PMS multivariate linear regression analysis adjusted for age and BMI was applied furthermore, independent sample T-test and Mann–Whitney U-test was applied to examine and evaluate the differences between the case and control groups and subgroups of PMS.
The statistical analysis of the study involved the use of Microsoft Excel 2016 and IBM SPSS version 28.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) as software tools.
The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Carbon Dynamics in Eucalyptus and Acacia Plantations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean C concentration and C stock, and respective associated standard deviation (SD) of the litter layer and the woody debris from young, middle-aged and mature Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations were calculated. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for any effect of forest type and/or stand age on either the proportion or quantity of C stored in the litter layer and woody debris, also including respective various components, woody debris at different diameter class and decay classes. A Tukey’s HSD test was used for comparison of means. All calculations and statistical analyses were carried out by Microsoft Excel 2016 and IBM SPSS (Version 22.0, SPSS Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chlamydia trachomatis Genotypes Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw data collection and statistical analysis were performed by Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS Statistics version.20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States), respectively. Abnormal cytology group (≥ASC-US was defined as women who had a diagnosis of the following cytology findings: ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL, HSIL or AGC). C.trachomatis genotypes were divided into two group, genotype B group and non-B genotypes group, genotype D group and non-D genotypes group, genotype E group and non-E genotypes group, and so on. The chi-square test (χ2), or two-sided Fisher exact test for 2 × 2 contingency table was used to evaluate the associations between different C.trachomatis genotypes, sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history, sexual behavior, and urogenital symptoms. Variables with a significance level of p < 0.2 were enrolled in the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted by potential confounders. Crude odds ratios (OR), adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biological Replicates Analysis with SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The whole experiment was performed with at least three biological replicates. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for difference analysis. The significance of the mean differences between treatments was analyzed with Duncan multiple comparison at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Biological Replicates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results were expressed as the means ± standard error (SE) from three independent experiments with three biological replicates for each. Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used to analyse data. The independent t-test (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) was used to analyse the significance differences for treatments on the same day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Fluorescence Intensity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical comparison of fluorescence intensity values was conducted by paired student’s t-test unless otherwise noted. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Where results from representative experiments including micrographs or NIR-nCLE images, the experiments were repeatedly independently at least three times. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and the IOR were calculated using the standard definitions and software from the SPSS statistical package V.25.0 (IBM Corporation). Statistical analysis was conducted using Graphpad Prism (Version 8.4.1, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, US), Microsoft Excel 2016, SPSS statistical package V 25.0 (IBM Corporation) and image analysis was conducted using Matlab (version 2020b and 2021a, MathWorks, Natick, MA), ImageJ version 1.52k and Image Studio version 5.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessing MetS Diagnostic Indices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was entered into Microsoft Excel 2016, and SPSS v26 (SPSS Inc.) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad LLC) were utilized for analysis. Categorical data were expressed as frequency (proportion). Continuous data were checked for normality using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Nonparametric data were expressed as median (interquartile range). Nonparametric data was analyzed with Mann–Whitney U‐test to evaluate differences between groups, while χ2 test was used to examine the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., sex) and MetS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to assess the potential of all three indices in identifying MetS. The cut‐off values for the indices generated on the ROC curves analysis were stratified into high and low and logistics regression analysis were performed. All statistical results obtained were deemed significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spatial Distribution of Soil PAHs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Origin 8.5, Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS 22.0 were used for statistical analysis and chart making of the measured data. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between soil pollutant concentration, soil organic carbon (SOC) and pH. Bigemap and ArcGIS 10.5 were used to map the spatial distribution of 16 PAHs in the soil of the PRD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Global Neurosurgical Practice Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were exported from the REDCap system into Microsoft Excel© 2016, and analyzed using SPSS (SPSS Inc. Released, 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.). Mean, mode, and frequency distributions were determined for respective variables in each country. When more than one mode was found for a variable, clarification was obtained by searching the literature or contacting neurosurgical society representatives for the respective country. When an answer was not able to be found, consensus was obtained amongst the authors as to which answer to select, and was then consistently applied to all relevant answers for a variable. Data was then analyzed at both a global and country-specific level. Countries were also grouped into high-income (HIC) and low- and middle-income (LMIC) classifications using the World Bank income classification. (The World Bank ) Nonparametric comparison of the means using the Mann-Whitney U test was performed, comparing the HIC to LMIC group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The figures were processed using Origin 8.5 (OriginLab, Hampton, MA, USA). The analysis of variance and mean comparison were based on the least significant difference test at the P< 0.05 probability level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!