The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using uplsapo30xs

1

Two-photon Excitation Microscopy for Live-cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For two-photon excitation microscopy (2PM), we used an FV1200MPE-IX83 inverted microscope (Olympus) equipped with a 30×/1.05 NA silicon oil-immersion objective lens (UPLSAPO 30XS; Olympus), an LCV110-MPE incubator microscope (Olympus) equipped with a 25×/1.05 water-immersion objective lens (XLPLN 25XWMP2; Olympus), and an InSight DeepSee Laser (Spectra Physics). The laser power was set to 3–18%. The scan speed was set between 4–12.5 μs per pixel. Z-stack images were acquired at 1–10 μm intervals. In time-lapse analyses, images were recorded every 1–3 min. The excitation wavelength for CFP was 840 nm. We used an IR-cut filter (BA685RIF-3), two dichroic mirrors (DM505 and DM570), and two emission filters (BA460-500 for CFP and BA520-560 for YFP) (Olympus). Confocal images were acquired with an FV1000/IX83 confocal microscope (Olympus) equipped with a 30×/1.05 NA silicon oil-immersion objective lens (UPLSAPO 30XS; Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Two-Photon Excitation Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For two-photon excitation microscopy (2PM), we used an FV1200MPE-IX83 inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 30x/1.05 NA silicon oil-immersion objective lens (UPLSAPO 30XS; Olympus) and an FV1200MPE-BX61WI upright microscope equipped with a 25x/1.05 water-immersion objective lens (XLPLN 25XWMP; Olympus) and an InSight DeepSee Laser (Spectra Physics, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The laser power was set to 8–10% and 2–4% for the observation of the intestine and the skin, respectively [33 (link), 38 (link)]. The scan speed was set at 20 μs/pixel. We used 840-nm light to excite CFP. We used an IR-cut filter (BA685RIF-3), two dichroic mirrors (DM505 and DM570), and two emission filters (BA460-500 for CFP and BA520-560 for YFP) (Olympus). Acquired images were analyzed with MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA, USA) as described previously [34 (link), 39 (link)].
Confocal images were acquired with an FV1000/IX83 confocal microscope (Olympus) equipped with a 30x/1.05 NA silicon oil-immersion objective lens (UPLSAPO 30XS; Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed on the Olympus FV1200 confocal microscope with GaAsP sensors. A 30x/1.05 silicone immersion objective (UPLSAPO30XS, Olympus) (Figures 4A, 5A) or a 60x/1.42 oil immersion objective (PLAPON60XO, Olympus) (Figures 4C–G, 5B–E) was used for scanning specific regions of interest. Confocal stacks were analyzed with the open-source software Image-J (National Institute of Health) and Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). Where appropriate, 2D/3D image deconvolution was applied using Diffraction PSF 3D and Parallel Iterative Deconvolution plugins in Image-J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Retardation Imaging of Fibronectin-Coated VSMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VSMCs were incubated on glass-bottom culture dishes (No. 1, Matsunami Glass Industry) coated with 5% fibronectin (F1141, Sigma-Aldrich) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 60 min. The cells were imaged under an inverted fluorescence microscope (IX71, Olympus) equipped with a birefringence imaging system (Abrio-LS, CRi)21 (link),40 (link) to analyse the retardation in samples. Because the retardation in background areas changed with time, a background image was taken just before imaging a cell. Cell retardation images were processed by subtracting background retardation from cell retardation. The retardation image was captured through an objective lens of 60× (UPLSAPO60XW, NA = 1.20, Olympus; UPLSAPO60XS2, NA = 1.30, Olympus) or 30× (UPLSAPO30XS, NA = 1.05, Olympus) with silicone immersion oil (SIL300CS-30CC, Olympus). DIC images of the cells were also obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3D Immunohistological Analysis of Liver Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3D immunohistological analysis was performed according to our original protocol30 (link). Pre-fixed, frozen liver samples were prepared by the same protocol as that used for 2D immunohistology. Samples were cut into 200-μm-thick sections using a cryostat microtome. After washing with PBS, the samples were permeabilized with blocking/permeabilization reagent and subjected to primary antibody staining, washing, and secondary antibody staining. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst33342 or SYTOX Green (Thermo Fisher). All procedures were performed at 4 °C on a rocking device, and antibody concentrations were the same as those used for 2D immunohistology (Supplementary Table 2). After staining, samples were treated with SeeDB44 (link) overnight. Images were acquired under a confocal microscope (FV-1000 or FV3000; Olympus) with a 30× silicone immersion lens (UPLSAPO30XS; Olympus). 3D images were reconstructed with IMARIS software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing Autophagy in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish eggs at the one-cell stage were microinjected with approximately 50 pg of either GFP-rat LC3B and rat LAMP1-RFP mRNA or rat LAMP1-GFP mRNA, which were synthesized from plasmids using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 Transcription Kit (AM1340, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (74104, QIAGEN). From 1 dpf, zebrafish embryos were maintained in water with 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (P7629, Sigma-Aldrich), which inhibits melanogenesis. Zebrafish were anesthetized with 0.03% tricaine (A5040, Sigma-Aldrich), placed in water on a glass-bottomed dish, and viewed using a confocal microscope (FV1000 IX81, Olympus) with an objective lens (UPLSAPO30XS, Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Resolution 3D Imaging of Neuronal Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial optical sections of brains were obtained with a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels using an FV-1000D or FV3000 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a silicone-oil immersion lens (30x objective, NA = 1.05, UPLSAPO30XS, 0.83 μm/pixel, 0.93-μm intervals; 60x objective, NA = 1.30, UPLSAPO60XS, 0.26 μm/pixel, 0.55-μm intervals; Olympus, Japan). Confocal datasets were reconstructed using the three-dimensional (3D)-reconstruction software FluoRender (Wan et al., 2009 (link)). For the projection analysis of En+ JO neurons (Figure 8b), signals of cells that were not relevant to the traced neurons were erased manually from the original images utilizing FluoRender for clarity. To overlay the trans-Tango signals from different brain samples (Figure 14b), brain images were digitally aligned to a template brain with non-rigid registration using the Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK; RRID: SCR_002234) (Jefferis et al., 2007). We used the signal of the nc82 antibody, which labels synaptic sites of all the neurons, as a reference. The size and color of the images were adjusted using Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA; RRID: SCR_014198), FluoRender, and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health; RRID: SCR_003070).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tracheae Staining and Optical Clearing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staining and optical clearing of dissected tracheae were performed as described in a previous study (Hirashima and Adachi, 2015 (link)). Briefly, the samples were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS overnight at 4°C. For anti-SOX9 staining, the samples were incubated in 25 mg/mL hyaluronidase (Nacalai Tesque, #18240-36) for 1 h at 37°C, to digest hyaluronic acid. The samples were then blocked in 10% normal goat serum (Abcam, #ab156046) diluted in 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS (PBT) for 3 h at 37°C. The samples were treated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed in 0.1% PBT, and subsequently incubated in secondary antibodies conjugated to either Alexa Fluor 546 or Alexa Fluor 647 overnight at 4°C. DAPI was used for nuclear counterstaining (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, #D523-10, 1:200 dilution). The samples were mounted with 10 μL of 1% agarose gel onto a glass dish (Greiner Bio-One, #627871) for stable imaging. Then, the samples were immersed in CUBIC-R+ (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., # T3741) solution for optical clearing. Images were acquired using the confocal laser scanning platform Leica TCS SP8 equipped with the hybrid detector Leica HyD, using a ×40 objective lens (NA = 1.3, WD = 240 μm, HC PL APO CS2, Leica) and the Olympus FluoView FV1000 with a ×30 objective lens (NA = 1.05, WD = 0.8 mm, UPLSAPO30XS, Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Autophagy in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish eggs at the one-cell stage were microinjected with 50 ng/µL of GFP-LC3 mRNA, which was synthesized from pcDNA3-GFP-LC3-RFP-LC3ΔG plasmid (Kaizuka et al., 2016 (link)) using a mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Transcription Kit (AM1344, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (74104, Qiagen). Embryos were anesthetized with 0.03% tricaine (A5040, Sigma-Aldrich), placed in water on a glass-bottomed dish, and viewed using a confocal microscope (FV1000 IX81; Olympus) with an objective lens (UPLSAPO30XS, Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Olympus Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed on the Olympus FV1200 confocal microscope with GaAsP sensors. A 30×/1.05 silicone immersion objective (UPLSAPO30XS, Olympus) (Figure 1C–D and Figure 2—figure supplement 1B), or a 60×/1.42 oil immersion objective (PLAPON60XO, Olympus) (Figures 2B–D and 3A, Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A) was used for scanning specific regions of interest (ROIs). A final voxel size of the image was 0.17 × 0.17 × 0.76 μm3 (Figure 1C–D), 0.11 × 0.11 × 0.45 μm3 (Figure 2B and Figure 2—figure supplement 1A), 0.21 × 0.21 × 0.43 μm3 (Figure 2C–D), 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.45 μm3 (Figure 3A), 0.51 × 0.51 × 0.68 μm3 (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B), and 0.79 × 0.79 × 0.37 μm3 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), respectively. Confocal stacks were analyzed with the open-source software ImageJ (National Institute of Health) and Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). Where appropriate, 2D/3D image deconvolution was applied using Diffraction PSF 3D and Parallel Iterative Deconvolution plugins in ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!