The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using anti cd14 pe cy7

1

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of CD14, CD25, CD28, CD45, CD61, CD90, TLR1 and TLR4 were analyzed using a flow cytometer (CYTOMICS FC 500, Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL) according to manufacturer's instruction. Anti-CD14-PE-Cy7, CD25-FITC, TLR4-PE, CD28-PE, CD61-PE, CD90-FITC and CD45-APC were purchased from (BD Biosciences) ; anti-TLR1-PE was purchased from (eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Dendritic Cells and Monocytes in Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mononuclear cells (1 × 106 cells) isolated previously from PB, PF, and tumor tissue were incubated with fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against cell-surface markers: anti-BDCA-1 FITC (MACS Miltenyi), anti-CD19 PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD Pharmingen), anti-BDCA-2 FITC (MACS Miltenyi), anti-CD123 PE-Cy7 (Biolegend), anti-CD45 FITC (BD Pharmingen), anti-CD14 PE-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen), anti-PD-L1 APC (Biolegend), and anti-PD-L2 PE (Biolegend) for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the cells were washed twice with PBS, and the percentage of myeloid BDCA-1+CD19 DCs and plasmacytoid BDCA-2+CD123+ DCs, and CD45+CD14+ MO/MA with PD-L1 or PD-L2 expression was analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCanto I Becton Dickinson, USA). The frequency of mDCs, pDCs, and MO/MA are presented as the percentage of mononuclear cells. For each tube, 100,000 events were acquired and analyzed using FacsDiva software. The expression levels of PD-L1/PD-L2 are presented as the percentage of total respective cell subsets (i.e., myeloid BDCA-1+CD19, plasmacytoid BDCA-2+CD123+ DCs, and CD45+CD14+ MO/MA). The method of identification pDCs with PD-L1/PD-L2 expression is presented in Figure 13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

VP6-specific B Cell Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VP6-specific B cell staining was performed with VLP VP2-eGFP/VP6 (2 μg per test) prior to staining B cells with a fluorescently-tagged Ab panel as described (anti-CD3-PE Cy7 (clone: SKY, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), anti-CD14 PE Cy7 (clone: M5E2, BD), anti-CD16-PE Cy7 (clone: 3G8, BD), anti-CD56-PE Cy7 (clone: B159, BD), anti-CD19 (clone: Sj25C1, BD), anti-CD20-APC H7 (clone: 2H7, BD), anti-CD27-PE (clone: MT271, BD), anti-CD38 (clone: HIT2, BD), anti-IgA (clone: IS11-8E10, Miltenyi Biotec), and anti-IgG (clone: G18-145, BD)) 8 (link), 13 (link). VLPs VP2-eGFP/VP6 were generated as described65 (link). The concentration of VLPs required per staining reaction was determined in titration experiments on VP6- and VP4-specific hybridomas. Data were acquired on the BD FACS Aria III or LSR II with DIVA software version 8.0 (Becton Dickinson). At least 100, 000 events were acquired per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

T cell-Monocyte Co-culture in Cirrhosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T cells from healthy blood donors were co-cultured at 0.25×106 cells/mL with monocytes from a subset of cirrhotic patients (N=9) or healthy controls (N=9) in round-bottom ultra-low attachment 96-well microplates (7007, Corning). Cells were incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2, and subsequently stained with an antibody panel comprising Live/Dead™ Yellow (Life Technologies), anti-CD14-PE-Cy7 (clone M5E2; BD Biosciences) or anti-CD14-FITC (clone: MφP9; BD Biosciences) and anti-CD3-FITC (clone: HIT3a; BD Biosciences) or anti-CD3-BUV496 (clone: UCHT1; BD Biosciences), and analysed on a five-laser BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PBMC Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, PBMCs were washed and pelleted. Each PMBC sample was labelled with an antibody mix (anti-CD16-FITC, anti-CD25-PE, anti-CD14-PE-Cy7, anti-CD19-APC, and anti-CD3-APC-Cy7, all from BD, and 7-aminoactinomycin D from Life Technologies) and incubated for 20 min. Next, cells were washed and acquired in a Guava EasyCyte 8HT flow cytometer (Millipore, Merk, Madrid, Spain). Single staining and isotype controls were used to set the gating strategy. The percentage of each cell population of PBMCs (T, B, NK cells, and monocytes), their activation, and cell viability were analyzed. All conditions were studied in duplicate and the experiment was repeated twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred microliters of whole blood were stained with anti-CD3-PECy7 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA; clone HIT3a), anti-CD8-PECy5 (BioLegend; clone SK1), anti-PD-L1-PE (BioLegend; clone 29E.2A3), anti-CD14-PECy7 (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA; clone M5E2), anti-CD41a-FITC (Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany; clone HIP8), and anti-CD62P-APC (Immunotools; clone HI62P). The cells were then incubated for 15 min in the dark before adding 2 mL of BD FACS lysing solution 1X (BD Bioscience) for 10 min. Finally, the cells were washed with 2 mL of PBS 1X and resuspended in 400 µL of PBS 1X before acquisition by flow cytometry (MACSQuant Analyzer 10 flow cytometer; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Galdbach, Germany). Negative gates for each marker were defined by fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparametric Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of CD3, CD4, CD14, CD25, CD45, CD61, CD90, TLR1 and TLR4 were analyzed using a flow cytometer (CYTOMICS FC 500, Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL) according to manufacturer's instruction and the data was analyzed using Flow Jo analysis software. Anti-CD14-PE-Cy7, CD25-FITC, TLR4-PE, CD61-PE, CD90-FITC, CD45-APC, CD3-FITC and anti-CD4-PE-Cy5 were purchased from (BD Biosciences) ; anti-TLR1-PE was purchased from (eBioscience).
Cell cycle analysis and apoptosis analysis were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol as previously described 43 (link). All experiments were performed at least in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed, and dead cells were stained using the Live/Dead Fixable Cell Stain kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies, including anti-CD3 (BV605; BD Biosciences), anti-CD4 (BV510; BD Biosciences), anti-CD8 (BV421; BD Biosciences), anti-CD14 (PE-Cy7; BD Biosciences), anti-CD19 (Alexa Fluor 700; BD Biosciences), and anti-CD56 (VioBright FITC; Miltenyi Biotec). For staining with anti-granzyme B (BD Biosciences), cells were permeabilized using a Foxp3 staining buffer kit (eBioscience).
For intracellular cytokine staining of IFN-γ, PBMCs were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 50 ng/ml) (Sigma Aldrich) and ionomycin (1 μg/ml) (Sigma Aldrich). Brefeldin A (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences) and monesin (GolgiStop, BD Biosciences) were added 1 hour later. After another 5 hours of incubation, cells were harvested for staining with the Live/Dead Fixable Cell Stain kit, anti-CD3, anti-CD4, and anti-CD8. Following cell permeabilization, cells were further stained with anti-IFN-γ (Alexa Fluor 488; eBioscience).
Flow cytometry was performed on an LSR II instrument using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) and the data analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar, San Carlos, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of monocytes, imMo-DCs, and mMo-DCs were captured by EVOS M5000 light microscope with phase contrast (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cell recovery and viability were analyzed by NucleoCounter NC200 automated cell counter (ChemoMetec). ImMo-DCs and mMo-DCs were labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for 30 min at 4°C after blocking nonspecific sites with Human BD Fc Block (BD Biosciences) to detect expression of maturation markers and co-stimulatory molecules. The following mAbs were used: anti-CD14-PECy7, anti-CD80-PE, anti-CD83-BV786, anti-CD86-APC, anti-MHC class II antigen-BB515 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD1a-eFluor450 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nonspecific antibody binding was assessed using appropriate isotype controls (mouse IgG2a PE-Cy7, mouse IgG2a PE, mouse IgG1 BV786, mouse IgG1 APC, mouse IgG2a BB515, mouse IgG1 eFluor450). Cell debris and dead cells were excluded from the analysis based on light-scatter properties and 7-AAD fluorescence signal (BD Biosciences). Immunophenotype (IPT) was assessed by BD FACSCelesta SORP (BD Biosciences), and data analysis was carried out by FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multicolor Flow Cytometry for MDSC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For MDSCs characterization the following mAbs were used: anti-CD14/Pe-Cy7, anti-CD11b/APC-Cy7, anti-HLA-DR/PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-Lineage cocktail 1/FITC (BD Biosciences), anti-CD33/PE, anti-CD15/APC, anti-TGF-β/FITC (BioLegend) and anti-ARG1/AlexaFluor488, anti-IDO/AlexaFluor488, anti-IL-10/FITC (R&D Systems). For intracellular staining, the cells were fixed/permeabilized using a Cytofix/Cytoperm Fixation/Permeabilisation Kit (BD Biosciences, USA). Nonspecific staining was prevented by using FcR Blocker (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Cells were analyzed with BD FACSCanto flow cytometer using FACS DIVA software (BD Biosciences, USA) and FCS express (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). The gating strategy for MDSCs is shown in Figure 1A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!