The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Masshunter profinder b 08

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 is a software application developed by Agilent Technologies for the processing and analysis of mass spectrometry data. It provides tools for the detection, identification, and quantification of compounds in complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using masshunter profinder b 08

1

Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data files were deconvoluted, integrated and aligned using MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 (Agilent Technologies Inc.). Peaks with amplitudes of less than 1000 counts were ignored. Compounds must have been present in at least 60% of replicates from one treatment to be included in statistical analyses. Peak areas were normalized to the naphthalene-D8 internal standard. Statistical analysis was performed using GeneSpring MPP (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), where p≤0.05 was used throughout to test for statistical significance. T-tests and ANOVA included the Benjamin-Hochberg false discovery rate corrections. Tukey’s honest significance difference was applied to ANOVAs post hoc. Prior to principal component analysis (PCA), the data was mean centered and scaled to unit standard deviation within each compound, across all samples. Putative compound identification was performed by comparing mass spectra to the NIST 2014 Library and by a comparison of calculated Kovats Indices to reported values, when available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS Data Preprocessing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw data obtained by the UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS positive ESI mode were cleaned of background noise and unrelated ions by the Batch Recursive Feature Extraction (BRFE) tool included in the MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 software (Agilent). The BRFE algorithm creates a list of masses and retention times, associated with the abundance of the possible components representing the full TOF masses from the spectral data. Each component is the sum of co-eluting ions that are related by charge-state envelope, isotopic distribution, and/or the presence of different adducts and dimmers. In order to find co-eluting adducts of the same feature, the following adducts were selected: +H, +Na, and +NH4 for UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS data.
Data were filtered according to these criteria: 1) features found in blanks and 2) absent in more than 50% of QCs. Additionally, data with a coefficient of variation (CV) lower than 30% in the QCs were kept.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Oxidative Stress through GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GC-MS data files were deconvoluted, integrated and aligned using MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Compounds with siloxane base peaks (73, 147, 207, 221 and 281 m/z) were removed as they are artefacts from the PDMS sorbent. Compounds found in less than 60% of replicates from one treatment were also excluded from analysis. Peak areas were normalized to the naphthalene-d8 internal standard. Compounds were tentatively identified by calculating their Kovats Retention Index in comparison to reported literature values and by comparison of extracted mass spectra to the NIST 2014 mass spectral library.
Data analyses were performed on MATLAB R2017a software (Mathworks, Natick, MA), PLS_Toolbox (Version 8.6, Eigenvector Research Inc., Manson, WA) and Agilent’s GeneSpring (Version B.14.9), with p-value = 0.05 throughout. Specifically, PLS regressions were built using PLS_Toolbox. Presented are the results of cross validation only, in which the PLS model predicts the concentration of the oxidative stressor in the media (e.g. 10% CSE or 50 mM H2O2) based on the volatile profile of that sample. Predicted concentrations are plotted against the known, or actual, concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomic Data Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 (Agilent Technologies Inc.) was used to deconvolute, integrate and align the data. Peaks with amplitudes of less than 1000 counts were ignored. Compounds must have been present in at least 60% of replicates from one treatment to be included in statistical analyses. Peak areas were normalized to the internal standard peak area of each data file. Furthermore, a VOC from a bacterial isolate or anal swab sample must have been, on average, three times greater than the respective controls (media blanks, etc.) to be included in this analysis. Tentative compound identification was based on the combined comparing mass spectra to the NIST 2014 Library and by a comparison of the calculated matching of standard alkane retention indices (LRI) values, when available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive MS-based Profiling Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The QC samples were injected in triplicate in the full-scan MS acquiring mode from 100 to 1050 m/z, in the POS and NEG ion modes, to create an inclusion list to be used in the auto MS/MS mode. The data obtained in the MS experiment from the QC samples were extracted using the batch recursive feature extraction algorithm in MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 software (Agilent), then the features were evaluated individually among the replicates to ensure reproducibility and exported as CEF (Cluster Exchange Format) files. Mass Profiler software (Agilent) was used for alignment of features using retention time (RT) tolerance of up to 0.3 min and mass tolerance of ±15 ppm. Features with 100% occurrence in the replicates were used to create a target MS/MS inclusion list.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Annotation Using Databases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw data were imported into MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for peak deconvolution and time alignment. For the data obtained in positive ionization mode, adducts with H+, Na+, K+, NH4+ were selected as well as neutral loss of water. For negative ionization mode, adducts with H, HCOO, Cl and the loss of a water molecule were considered. All MS signals lower than 200 counts were considered background noise. For peak alignment between samples, a retention time shift of 0.15 min was allowed as well as a 15 ppm error for mass detection. Afterwards, the data were filtered to retain only the features present in all replicates for each extraction method. Moreover, features detected in blank samples were discarded. The metabolites annotation was carried out using online databases such as LIPID MAPS, METLIN, and Human Metabolome Database through the CEU Mass Mediator platform (http://ceumass.eps.uspceu.es/ (accessed on 20 May 2021)) [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative LC-QTOF Analysis of Metabolic Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-QTOF analysis of l-histidinol phosphate (Hisol-P), l-histidinol (Hisol) l-histidine (His), imidazole-glycerol phosphate (IGP), adenylosuccinate (AdSucc), 1-(5′-phosphoribosyl)-5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide (AICAR), phosphoribosyl-N-formylglycineamide (FGAR), inosine monophosphate (IMP), phosphoribosyl-aminoimidazolesuccinocarboxamide (SAICAR), adenosine monophosphate (AMP), and the pentose 5-phosphate pool (R5P) was carried out as previously described [17 (link)]. Automated data analysis with the “Batch Isotopologue Extraction” feature and natural isotopologue background subtraction was carried out in the MassHunter ProFinder (B.08.00, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) software. The relative isotopologue abundances (RIA) of the m + 5 isotopologue for the twelve measured metabolites for every time point was calculated according to: RIAm+5%=Intensity m+5j=0nIntensity m+jn=amount of carbon atoms
Throughout the analysis, the internal standard l-norvaline was monitored to investigate the possible intensity drifts on a global MS level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolite Identification using Open-Source MS-DIAL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The putative metabolite identification was performed using an open-source software, MS-DIAL (RIKEN PRIMe). Collected MS/MS data was converted as.abf-files using Analysis Base File Converter program (Reifycs Inc.) and converted files were imported to MS-DIAL (versions 2.66 to 3.12). Public databases, Metlin and MassBank of North America (MoNA), and in-house LC–MS/MSMS standard library were downloaded to MS-DIAL for utilization of retention time, accurate mass, isotope ratio and MS/MS spectrum information for peak and metabolite identification. The built-in MS-DIAL library was utilized for lipid identification. Each matched spectrum was manually inspected. The guidelines from Sumner et al. (2007 (link)) were used for ranking metabolite identifications as follows: Compounds in identification level 1 were verified by comparing exact mass, retention time and MS/MS fragmentation spectra with in-house LC–MS/MSMS standard library. Compounds in level 2 were matched with exact mass and MSMS spectra from public databases mentioned above. MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 software (Agilent Technologies) was applied for targeted feature extraction to minimize the appearance of false negative features implemented with the manual inspection and integration of the targeted feature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Metabolomic Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full-scan analysis was performed in triplicate using the QC samples acquired over the range of 100 to 1050 m/z in the NEG mode to create an inclusion list to further create the auto MS/MS acquisition mode. Data were extracted using batch recursive feature extraction algorithm in MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 software (Agilent) and after evaluation exported as CEF (Cluster Exchange Format) files. The features were aligned on Mass Profiler software (Agilent) using retention time (RT) tolerance of up to 0.3 min and mass tolerance of ± 15 ppm. Features with a 100% occurrence in the replicates were used to create a target MS/MS inclusion list.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Data Preprocessing for Metabolomics LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data collected after LC-MS analyses in both positive and negative ion modes were reprocessed with the Agilent MassHunter Profinder B.08.00 software. The datasets were extracted using the Batch Recursive Feature Extraction (RFE) workflow integrated in the software. This workflow comprises two steps: the Batch Molecular Feature Extraction (MFE) and the Batch Find by Ion feature extraction (FbI). The MFE algorithm consisted of removing unwanted information including the background noise, and then creating a list of possible components that represent the full range of time-offlight (TOF) mass spectral data features, which are the sum of co-eluting ions that are related by charge-state envelope, isotopologue pattern, and/or the presence of different adducts and dimers. Additionally, the MFE is intended to detect coeluting adducts of the same feature, selecting the following adducts:
LC-MS negative ion mode, with neutral loss of water also included. The algorithm then aligns the molecular features across the study samples using the mass and RT to build a single spectrum for each compound group. The next step involves FbI using the median values derived from the MFE process to perform a targeted extraction to improve the reliability of finding and reporting features from complex datasets used for differential analysis [23] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!