The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

149 protocols using zetasizer zs90

1

Micro- and Nano-Bubble Generation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used deionized (DI) water, air, and a laboratory-made micro-/nano-bubble generator to prepare the bubbly water (Figure 1) by mechanical-shear- and Venturi-type flow. When the generation eased, the microbubbles (white, milky) ascended to the bulk surface due to the buoyancy, and disappeared in about 10 min, with nanobubbles (transparent) left in the water. Samples of the water with nanobubbles were characterized by using Zetasizer (ZS90, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) and nanoparticle tracking analyzer (Nanosight 500, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK), as shown in Figure 2. The three measurements performed by using DLS, and the average curve of five measurements performed by using NTA showed that the nanobubbles were within 50–450 nm in diameter, with the concentration of 1.94·108 bubbles in per ml of water. The microbubbles were measured by using a microscopic imaging device (PBM, Pixact, Tampere, Finland), as shown in Figure 3. Plenty of snapshots were recorded and image analysis was performed using the associated software to produce the size distribution of the microbubbles. As shown in Figure 3d, more than 97% of the bubbles captured were less than 100 μm in diameter. The zeta potential of the bubbly water was about −20 mV, measured by using Zetasizer (ZS90, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The oil used was VG100 (Great wall).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Particle Size and Zeta Potential Characterization of Nanosuspension

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size of the developed formulations was measured to asses if any difference in particle size depending on the method used to make the nanosuspension. The formulation was diluted in water at 1:100 ratios and particle size were measured. Using a Zeta sizer ZS 90 (Malvern Instrument Ltd., UK) at a 90° angle, fluctuations in light scattering (due to Brownian motion) are identified in photon correlation spectroscopy [14 ]. The batches with lower particle sizes were selected for further characterization like zeta potential determination. The Nanosuspension was deposited in a folded capillary cell and then into the analyzing chamber of a Zetasizer ZS 90 (Malvern Instrument Ltd., UK), which uses the Electrophoretic Light Scattering (ELS) technique to detect zeta potential [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Droplet Size and Zeta Potential Analysis of SEDDS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The droplet size distribution of the diluted SEDDS was measured using a laser light scattering analyzer (Zetasizer ZS 90, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). All SEDDS were diluted in a ratio of 1:250 (v/v) with distilled water and mixed for 1 min prior to testing. From the light scattering signal (monitored at 25 °C and 173° in automatic mode), the intensity-weighed diameter of dispersion droplets (reported as the z-average) and the polydispersity index (PDI) were calculated using the manufacturer’s software. The zeta potential of the selected formulations was determined by electrophoretic light scattering technique using the Zetasizer ZS 90 (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) with a laser wavelength of 633 nm at a temperature of 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Functionalized Chitosan Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was carried out using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 65 and used to confirm both the N-succinylation of the chitosan and its functionalisation with CB; whereas both morphology and structure of NSC and NSC-CB were investigated using a Zeiss Σigma™ field emission gun scanning transmission electron microscope (SEM, FEG-STEM). The size of the beads was evaluated using a dynamic light scattering system (DLS) from Zetasizer ZS90 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Gigantic Vesicle Hydrodynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameters of CLUS, AnaGV, and MegaGVs were measured using Zetasizer ZS90 (Malvern Instruments). The size distribution profile was computed using Zetasizer program using the scattered light intensity. The maximum diameters that can be measured is 6 μm. GVs larger than 6 μm may not be detected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of TBL-IE2 and TBL-IE2-QD Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter (Z-average) and zeta potential of the TBL-IE2 and TBL-IE2-QD complex were determined with a Zetasizer ZS90 (Malvern®, Malvern, UK). Briefly, 20 μg/mL samples were placed in polystyrene disposable cells. Each sample was analysed on a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 DLS, at a 90° angle in triplicate, each measurement consisting of 10 runs of 60 s. For the zeta potential and particle size, the samples were placed in folded-capillary disposable cells and evaluated in triplicates of 15 runs. Results were reported as mean ± standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of CdSe Nanorods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the synthesis of CdSe nanorods, 0.266 g Cd(CH3COO)2·2H2O and 0.345 g sodium selenite were added into 50 mL capacity Teflon-lined stainless autoclave, followed by the addition of 20 mL distilled water and 20 mL ethanediamine. The mixture was stirred using magnetic stirrer to a homogeneous system. The autoclave was placed in an oven at 150 °C for 12 h. After completion of the dual time, autoclave is allowed to cool to room temperature. The black product was collected and washed with distilled water and ethanol 6 times respectively and dried at room temperature for further use. The general morphology of the products was characterized by transmission electron microscopy. The crystal structure and composition of the sample were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/MAX-2500, JAPAN SCIENCE) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). CdSe nanorods were dispersed in saline and RPMI medium with a final concentration is 20 μg/mL respectively, and ultrasonic vibration was fully carried out to ensure their dispersion. The solution was allowed to stand for 24 h, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and ζ potential characterization of CdSe nanorods, which dispersed in saline and DMEM (0 h and 24 h, respectively) were determined using a Zetasizer (ZS90, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Liposome Characterization and Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The average particle size (nm), polydispersion index (PDI) and zeta potential (mV) of the liposomes, with and without 0.2% NOR (w/v) were monitored for 180 days, using dynamic light scattering (DLS) in a ZetaSizer ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The measurements were carried out in triplicate (25 °C) and ANOVA/Tukey tests were employed (p < 0.05) for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Nanoparticle Surface Charge

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface charge on the nanoparticles was measured using a Zetasizer ZS90 (Malvern Instrument, Westborough, MA, USA). In brief, a 50 μL chitosan nanoparticle sample was diluted 20 times and transferred to a specialized cuvette for zeta potential measurement. A specialized cuvette containing samples was placed into the sample holder, and three measurements were taken at 25 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of MOF and Mn-MOF Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential of MOF and Mn-MOF were determined using DLS (ZetaSizer ZS 90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). The morphology of MOF and Mn-MOF was observed by TEM (Tecnai G2-20, FEI, Netherlands). PXRD patterns of MOF and Mn-MOF were detected on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) at a scanning rate of 4º/min with 2θ broadening from 3 to 30° by Cu Ka radiation. TGA of Mn-TCPP, MOF and Mn-MOF was performed on a PerkinElmer Pyris1 TGA (PerkinElmer Instruments, Waltham, MA, USA) from room temperature to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The specific surface area and pore size of MOF and Mn-MOF were determined by the nitrogen adsorption technique at 150 °C on a micromeritics-ASAP 2420-4 system (Norcross, GA, USA). The elemental composition and valence state of Mn-MOF were evaluated by XPS (AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600W, Shimdzu, Japan). UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra of MOF and Mn-MOF were conducted on a TU 1901 UV-Vis-NIR spectrometer (Beijing Persee, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!