The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vectashild

Manufactured by Vector Laboratories
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

Vectashield is a mounting medium designed to preserve fluorescence in immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization applications. It is formulated to minimize photobleaching and maintain the integrity of fluorescent signals.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using vectashild

1

Quantifying Retinal Ganglion Cell Transduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right eyes were removed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Retinas were flat-mounted on slides, then covered with a mounting medium (Vectashild; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). For each slide, 3 areas in each quadrant (0.0988 mm2/area, 12 areas in total) were photographed using a fluorescence microscope (BZ-9000; KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). Each image was obtained using Z-stacking and was stored. Cell counts were performed by image analysis (BZ-9000 software; KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). Both the number of fluorogold-positive and fluorogold plus Cherry fluorescence double-positive RGCs were used to estimate the transduction efficiency of mVChR1. Furthermore, both the number of fluorogold-positive and fluorogold, Cherry, and Venus fluorescence triple-positive RGCs were used to estimate the percentage of RGCs double-positive for Cherry and Venus fluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FISH Karyotyping of Cannabis sativa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following probes were used: pTa71 (18S-28S rDNA) [11 (link)], pCT4.2 (5S rDNA) [69 (link)], the CS-1 probe (C. sativa subtelomeric repeat JX402748), and the CS-237 probe (C. sativa repeat ON055366). CS-1 (a clone preserved from the research by Divashuk et al., 2014), 5S rDNA, and 18S-28S rDNA were labeled by nick-translation with digoxigenin-11-dUTP, and CS-237 was labeled by PCR with biotin-16-dUTP according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Boehringer, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany). The FISH experiments were performed as described by Karlov et al. [70 (link)]. The stringency of the FISH was about 72% (washing conditions: 15 min in 0.1× SSC at 42 °C). The chromosomes were counterstained with 1 mg/mL DAPI and mounted in Vectashild (Vector Laboratories, UK). An AxioImager M1 fluorescent microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to observe the chromosome preparations. The metaphase plates with fluorescent signals were photographed with a monochrome AxioCam MRm CCD camera and visualized using the Axiovision software (Zeiss). The metaphase chromosomes were classified according to Levan et al. [71 (link)] based on their arm ratios and FISH hybridization patterns.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cytogenetic Analysis of Cannabis sativa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following probes were used: pTa71 (18S-28S rDNA) [52] (link), pCT4.2 (5S rDNA) [53] (link), the Arabidopsis-type telomere probe (5'-CCCTAAA-3')3 synthesized with a TAMRA label (ZAO “Syntol”, Moscow, Russia) and the CS-1 probe (C.sativa subtelomeric repeat (JX402748)). All DNA probes were labeled by nick translation and PCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Boehringer, Germany) with biotin-16-dUTP (CS-1, pCT4.2) or digoxigenin-11-dUTP (pTa71). FISH experiments were performed as described by Karlov et al. [21] . The chromosomes were counterstained with 1 mg/ml DAPI and mounted in Vectashild (Vector laboratories, UK). An AxioImager M1 fluorescent microscope (Zeiss) was used to observe chromosome preparations. The metaphase plates with fluorescent signals were photographed with a monochrome AxioCam MRm CCD camera and visualized using Axiovision software (Zeiss). Metaphase chromosomes were classified according to Levan et al. [54] based on their arm ratio and FISH hybridization pattern. In each experiment, at least 20 mitotic metaphase plates from each of the 11 male and 8 female plants were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Localization of Tandem Repeats by FISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The physical localization of the 6 tandem repeats (TRs) was analyzed by the FISH procedure. A chromosome spread preparation was made from root tip as described in [28 (link)]. Good slides with well-spread chromosomes were stored at 4 °C until use. FISH was carried out following the procedure in [60 (link),61 (link)]. After hybridization, the chromosomes were counterstained with 1 mg/mL DAPI. The detection was performed using streptavidin-conjugated Cy3 or FITC (Roche, Basel, Switzerland); signals in all variants were visualized using an AxioZeiss Imager V1 fluorescence microscope.
After post-hybridization washing of WWGH chromosome mitotic preparations as described in Komuro et al. [62 (link)] multicolor genomic in situ hybridization (mcGISH) was conducted on the same slides as described in Kishii et al. [63 (link)] with modifications described in Salina et al. [15 (link)]. The probes were the Pseudoroegneria spicata (St genome) and Dasypyrum villosum (V genome) genomic DNA (50 ng/preparation) labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP and with biotin-16-dUTP, respectively, by nick translation, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche, Germany). The chromosomes were counterstained with 1 mg/mL DAPI and mounted in Vectashild (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK).
The results were recorded with an AxioCam Mrm Zeiss camera and contrasted using AxioVision software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cryopreservation and Immunofluorescence Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were immersed in 4% formaldehyde overnight. Subsequently, they were washed three times with 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then cryopreserved in 20% sucrose for 3 days and 40% sucrose for 1 week. Samples were then embedded in OCT (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and sectioned using a Leica CM1860 cryostat (Leica Biosystems, Leider Lane Buffalo Grove, USA). The sections were then subjected to immunofluorescence. Primary antibodies specific for keratinocyte markers were used: cytokeratin 10 (abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, ab76318), cytokeratin 6 (abcam, ab93279), and EGFR (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA, sc-373746). The sections were incubated with primary antibodies, diluted 1/50, overnight, after which they were washed with PBS 7.4 and then incubated with secondary antibodies, diluted 1/100, for 2 hours (protected from light). The slides were assembled using vectashild® (Vector Laboratories, CA, USA) and coverslips. The analyzes were performed with confocal microscopy (Leica Microsystems, Teban Gardens Crescent, Singapore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunostaining of Pyruvate Kinase in HMECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HMEC cultured on collagen-coated 1.5 coverslips for 24 hours were washed with 3X PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, permeabilized in 0.1% Triton for 10 minutes, and blocked in 1% BSA/1X PBS for 30 minutes. After washing cells in 3X PBS, they were serially incubated in Anti-Pyruvate Kinase antibody (1:500, Abcam, MA, US, ab6191), Goat antibodies were conjugated to a secondary Alexa 488 antibody 1:500. The coverslips were then mounted on microscope slides using Vectashild (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) containing 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclei staining. Images were captured with a Leica TCS SP5 (Leica Microsystems Germany) confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dentin Slice Cell Adhesion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary human PDL cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells per well onto dentin slices either coated on control, non-cross-linked HA at a dilution of 1:100, 1:10, or pre-coated HA as well as cross-linked HA at a dilution of 1:100, 1:10, or pre-coated with HA cl. Cells were quantified using fluorescent imaging (from live/dead assay) at 8 h for cell numbers as previously described [26] (link). At desired time point of 8 h, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered solution (PBS), fixed with 4 % formaldehyde solution (Grogg-Chemie AG, Stettlen, Switzerland) for 5 min, and mounted with VECTASHILD (Vector, Burlingame, CA). Fluorescent images were quantified with a fluorescent microscope (OLYMPUS BX51, Tokyo, Japan). Experiments were performed in triplicate with five images captured per group. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using oneway analysis of variance with Tukey's test (*p values <0.05 was considered significant).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!