The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using ab124131

1

Western Blotting of Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ipsilateral basal cortical samples facing blood clots were extracted. Western blotting was performed as described previously (25 (link)). Cortical samples were homogenized and centrifuged (1,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C). The supernatant was further centrifuged, and then, the protein concentration was determined using the DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). An equal amount of protein (50 μg) was suspended in loading buffer, denatured at 95°C for 5 min, and loaded on an SDS-PAGE gel. After being electrophoresed and transferred into polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, the membrane was blocked with nonfat dry milk buffer for 2 h and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody for AIM2 (ab93015, 1:1,000, Abcam), pannexin-1 (ab124131, 1:1,000, Abcam), ASC (ab155970, 1:1,000, Abcam), caspase-1 (ab1872, 1:1,000, Abcam), P2X7R (1: 1,000, APR-004, Alomone, Jerusalem), IL-1β (SC-23460, 1:500; Santa Cruz), IL-18 (ab71495, 1:1,000; Abcam), and GAPDH (1:10,000, Fitzgerald, 10R-G109A). The membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The protein band densities were detected by x-ray film and quantified by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemistry Staining of Sciatic Nerve and DRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining was conducted as previously described [9 (link)]. In brief, after anesthetizing the mice with isoflurane, the animals were perfused with saline followed by 4% PFA. The sciatic nerves and the DRG were removed and post-fixed in 4% PFA for 8–12 h. The sciatic nerve sections and DRG slices (12 μm) were sectioned using a cryostat machine followed by immunohistochemistry staining. After washing, the slices were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and blocked with 10% BSA for 2 h at room temperature, and processed for immunostaining with the following primary antibodies: S100 β (1:400, mouse; Sigma, AMAB91038), NF200 (1:300, mouse; Sigma, N0142), Panx1 (1:200, rabbit; Abcam, ab124131) overnight at 4 °C. Then, the slices were incubated with a mixture of cy3 and 488-, or cy3 and cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000; Jackson Immuno Research) for 2 h at room temperature. For the staining of neurons in the DRG slices, Nissl staining (1:200, Thermo, N-21483) was applied and performed via the manufacturer’s instructions. Stained samples were examined using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon), and images were captured with a CCD Spot camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear and cytosolic fractions of the spinal cords of mice were prepared at six time points. Membrane and cytosolic fractions of cultured astrocytes were also prepared by the same procedure. A total of 20 μg protein lysates was then resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with rabbit monoclonal antibodies against SGK-1 (1:1,000; ab32374, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), GCR (1:1,000; sc1002, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), Pannexin-1 (1:1,000; ab124131, Abcam), Actin (1:1,000; sc1616-HRP, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or POL2 (1:1,000; sc900, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The specificities of antibodies for their target proteins have been validated in previous studies58 (link)59 (link)60 (link). Specific antigen–antibody complexes were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and a chemiluminescence reagent (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!