The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

R environment for statistical computing

Sourced in Austria

R is an open-source software environment for statistical computing and graphics. It provides a wide variety of statistical and graphical techniques, including linear and nonlinear modeling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, classification, clustering, and others. R is an interpreted language that allows users to write their own functions and manipulate data efficiently.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

8 protocols using r environment for statistical computing

1

Unresolved Psychiatric Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were conducted using R Environment for Statistical Computing (version 4.0.2, http://www.r-project.org/). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for the unresolved parents of adolescents with psychiatric diagnoses. All tests were two sided, and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Then a nomogram was created using the “rms” package based on the independent risk factors of logistic regression analysis. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated through measuring discrimination and calibration in both the modeling and validation datasets. Discrimination was evaluated by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). The calibration was assessed by observing the goodness of fit between the observed probability and the predicted probability in the calibration plot. Finally, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the nomogram based on net benefits at different threshold probabilities in the overall dataset (modeling and validation datasets).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Predictors of Clinically Important Change in VAS Scores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using the R-environment for statistical computing (www.r-project.org) [39] using paired t-tests, estimated mean differences and 95% CIs where appropriate. Logistic regression was used to determine which baseline factors were related to the response of a clinically important change in VAS scores. Potential explanatory variables were considered from demographics, as well as clinical, physiological and radiological variables, with univariate and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. A separate set of analyses was carried out to examine which subsets of predictors of a clinically important change in VAS scores were important baseline predictors. Logistic regression was used and sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), along with C statistics, were calculated for the best model within each subset of explanatory variables and overall (see supplementary table E2). Model selection was carried out using backward Akaike's information criteria (AIC) and final models were determined by those models that minimised these criteria, such that only significant variables were left in the final models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Myostatin and Type 1 Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bar graphs are presented as mean ± SEM with data points overlaid. Data points are presented as circles (controls) and triangles (T1D) with purple (female) and blue (male) colors to define sex. Participant characteristics are expressed as mean ± SEM. Not all samples were available for all analyses and the specific number of participants for each group are highlighted in the overlain dot plots and expressly written out in the figure legend. Due to multiple non‐normally distributed variables, nonparametric statistics were utilized in this study. Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests were performed to compare myostatin measurements between groups (i.e., CON and T1D). Kruskal–Wallis was used for comparisons of multiple groups (i.e., group and sex), followed by post hoc Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests with Bonferroni–Holm correction for multiple comparisons. Correlational analyses were performed with Spearman's rho (herein denoted as R). Statistical significance was established at p <0 .05. All analyses were carried out in the R environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Inter-rater Reliability Using Weighted Kappa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weighted kappa statistics were used to evaluate intra-observer and inter-observer agreement (intra- and inter-observer kappa: IAK and IEK). Kappa statistics measure agreement beyond the agreement due to chance alone (expected agreement). Weighted kappa statistics measure agreement between two observers for ordinal scoring scales taking into account how close their agreement is (e.g. 1 and 2 is a better agreement than 1 and 3). Weighted kappa values for the three raters, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), standard error (SE), and P-values, were calculated. According to the guidelines by Landis and Koch [21 (link)], we classified agreement in relation to kappa values as being excellent (0.81 to 1), good (0.61 to <0.81), moderate (0.41 to <0.61), fair (0.20 to <0.41), poor (0 to <0.20), and less than chance (<0). The data was analyzed using the R environment for statistical computing (R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis in R Environment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed in the R environment for statistical computing (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Details of the statistical analysis performed are given in corresponding results sections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Sublingual Microvascular Diameter Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess if the data were distributed normally. All values were displayed as the mean ± standard deviation or median with an interquartile range if the data were distributed skewed or nonskewed, respectively. Since each group's values were shown to have a nonskewed distribution, a nonparametric test (the Friedman test) was performed to analyze these data. Per-vessel diameter distributions measured by Mi-croTools were compared between different sublingual fields using linear mixed model analysis [16] . The sublingual field was entered into the model as fixed effects, and individual intercepts for subjects and per-subject random slopes representing the effect on the dependent variables were entered as random effects. p values were calculated using a likelihood ratio test of the full model with the effect in question against a "null model" that lacks the effect in question [17] . p values for individual fixed effects were obtained via the Satterthwaite approximation [18] . A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered as a criteron for significance. All the statistical tests were performed within the R environment for statistical computing, version 3.4.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.R-project.org/), and the figures were created with the ggplot2 software package, version 2.2.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Hospital Discharge Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using the R environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Continuous variables are summarised as the mean AE s.e.m., whereas categorical variables are summarised as frequencies and percentages. Clinical specialties were grouped into six categories according to the area of the body and the body system involved (e.g. neurology and neurosurgery were grouped together, as were cardiology, cardiac surgery and vascular). The 'other' group contained another seven specialties grouped together for the purpose of statistical analysis, each having only a small number of patients; these were haematology, hepatology, medical and radiation oncology, interventional radiology and renal and respiratory medicine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate the relationship between continuous BMI and hospital speciality. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyse the time to leaving hospital, where those who died were censored at their date of death. The initial model included effects of BMI group, age, sex and hospital speciality, as well as all two-way interactions with BMI group. Variables that were significant at the 5% level were retained for the final model. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are provided.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Differential Expression Analysis with Limma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential expression was assessed by performing a Student t test on the coefficients of simple linear models created with the ''limma'' R package (version 3.14.4). Correction for multiple hypothesis testing was performed with the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). Hierarchical clustering was performed with complete linkage and Euclidean distance metric, using expression values z-normalized to a mean of zero and standard deviation of one across all samples. All microarray analyses were performed using the R environment for statistical computing (version 2.15.1; the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!