The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using cefoxitin

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Disc Diffusion and E-Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because the disc diffusion method only allows the analysis of the impact of a single concentration of an antibiotic, in the second stage of the experiment, the E-test strips with exponentially decreasing antibiotic concentrations were applied for all of the antibiotics that were previously used in the disc diffusion test.
The cultures with the E-tests were exposed and incubated in the same way as described for the disc diffusion method. The E-tests containing cefoxitin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and teicoplanin were obtained from Liofilchem (Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). The analyses were performed on M–H agar in accordance with the E-test manufacturer’s recommendations.
The location of the Petri dishes in the RMF reactor chamber and the location of antibiotic discs and E-tests in Petri dishes are presented in Figure 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 18 antibiotics were used in the susceptibility test, by disk diffusion, with amoxicillin, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftiofur, cefepime, ceftaroline, aztreonam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, tigecycline, tetracycline, fosfomycin, chloramphenicol, and nitrofurantoin (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). The interpretation was performed according to CLSI [45 ]. tigecycline resistance was interpreted according to EUCAST [46 ]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control. In accordance with EUCAST standards, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for colistin was determined by the broth microdilution method [46 ]. MDR profiles were determined according to standard criteria [26 (link)]. ESBL detection was performed using the double-disk synergy test (DDST) [45 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing with E-Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because the disk diffusion method allows to analysis of the impact of a single concentration of an antibiotic/disk, in this experiment E-test strips with exponentially decreasing antibiotic gradient were applied. In this investigation line, the antibiotics were selected whose application, coupled with exposure to RMF, caused the largest and the smallest differences in the zones of growth inhibition in the disc diffusion method (compared to unexposed controls). The E-tests containing cefoxitin, amoxicillin, imipenem, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ceftazidime and cefepime were obtained from Liofilchem (Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy), whereas the E-test containing meropenem was purchased from BioMérieux (Craponne, France).
Similarly, as in the case of the disc diffusion method, the optimal RMF frequency and exposure time, as well as unexposed controls were used. The analyses were performed on M-H agar in accordance with the E-test manufacturer’s recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method (15 (link)). The following antimicrobial agents were used with their respective concentrations, obtained from Liofilchem Company, Italy: Amoxicillin (25 μg), Amoxicillin-clavulanate (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefriaxone (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), nitrofurantoin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and chloramphenicol (30 μg). CLSI standard was used to compare the results (16 ).
Non-susceptibility to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more antimicrobial categories was defined as multi-drug resistance (MDR) isolates, while non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories was defined as pan-drug resistance (PDR) isolates (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling by Disk Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the isolates were carried out using the disk diffusion method [61 ]. Firstly, from an overnight pure culture, three to five colonies were suspended in 5 mL of normal saline (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). The suspension was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland (approximately 1–2 × 108 CFU/mL) using a CrystalSpec nephlometer (BD Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The antibiotic disks included ampicillin (AMP 10 mg), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP 110 mg), cefepime (FEP 30 mg), cefotaxime (CTX 30 mg), cefoxitin (FOX 30 mg), ceftazidime (CAZ 30 mg), imipenem (IPM 10 mg), meropenem (MEM 10 mg), amikacin (AK 30 mg), gentamicin (CN 10 mg), and ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 mg) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy and BioMérieux, Voie Romaine, Craponne, France). The susceptibility assay was carried out according to the CLSI standards [62 (link)], placed on the nutrient agar plates (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK), and inoculated using sterile forceps. The plates were then incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C. E. coli (ATCC 25922) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used as susceptible control strains. The readings were taken after 18–24 h, and the interpretive categories and zone diameter breakpoints are listed in Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of MRSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of the MRSA isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA, CONDA, Spain), according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The disk diffusion assay was done with 14 antibiotics: bacitracin (10 U), enrofloxacin (5 μg) (OXOID), streptomycin (10 μg), spiramycin (100 μg), sulfadiazine (25 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg) (BD), doxycycline (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), neomycin (30 μg), penicillin (10 U), tetracycline (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25 μg/23.75 μg, respectively) (BIO-RAD). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for cefoxitin and vancomycin was determined by using MIC Test Strip (Liofilchem) on inoculated Mueller Hinton agar plates and the results were interpreted according EUCAST breakpoints. S. aureus strain ATCC 25923 and Enterococcus faecalis strain ATCC 29212 were used as controls in the susceptibility test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae via PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A direct PCR was performed in the KEMRI-NUITM laboratory to confirm the presence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The direct PCR was done using the mighty amp reagents and the simpliprep machine. Specifically designed primers, forward-CGGCAGCATTCAATTTGTTAAAGC and reverse-CGCCATTTTTGTA, which were to yield a PCR product of 162 base pairs each, were used [14 ]. The thermal cycle conditions for the simpliprep machine were: 94°C, 60 sec (denaturation), 59°C, 60 secs (annealing), 72°C, 26 sec/max 429bp (1 min. kbp), (elongation), 72°C, 10 minutes (extended elongation). When the reaction was over, the samples were loaded on gel electrophoresis, stained, and viewed under ultraviolet light (UV).
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by disk diffusion using 13 antimicrobials from Liofilchem Company (Ciprofloxacin (CIP,30μg), Ceftriaxone (CRO,30μg), Cefepime (FEP,25μg), Cefotaxime (CTX,30μg), Cefuroxime (CXM,30μg), Cefazolin (KZ,30μg), Ceftazidime (CAZ,30μg), Cefoxitin (FOX,30μg), Tetracycline (TE,30μg), Ampicillin (AMP,10μg), Amikacin (AK,30μg), Gentamycin (CN,30μg) and Amoxillin (AUG,30μg).The antimicrobial discs were inoculated onto a culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and incubated for 24–48 hours. The zone of inhibition was measured and interpreted using the CLSI 2016 guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) method was used for the detection of antimicrobial resistance patterns. Nine separate antimicrobial susceptibility discs, including imipenem, doripenem, amikacin, ceftazidime, aztreonam, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin, and cefepime (MAST, UK) were used. Plates were incubated for 18–24 hours in ambient air at 35ºC±2 and the diameters of zones of inhibition around the antimicrobial discs recorded to the nearest whole millimeter using a graduated ruler. Results were reported as “sensitive,” “intermediate,” or “resistant” based on the cut-off values recommended by CLSI 2018.16
MIC test was performed for all the P. aeruginosa isolates based on the standard CLSI guidelines 2018 using E.test (Liofilchem, Italy) and broth microdilution method for the following antimicrobials: amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, cefoxitin, and colistin. For all phenotypic tests, P. aeruginosa ATCC 15,442 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 were used as a positive control, and P. aeruginosa PAO-1 was used as a negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!