The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

May grunwald giemsa staining

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

May-Grunwald/Giemsa staining is a laboratory technique used for the staining of blood smears and other cytological preparations. It is a differential stain that allows for the visualization and identification of various cell types, such as red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets, based on their distinct staining patterns.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using may grunwald giemsa staining

1

May-Grunwald/Giemsa Staining of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were subjected to cytospin and colored with May-Grunwald/Giemsa staining (Sigma). Pictures were taken with a CFW-1308C color digital camera (Scion Corporation) on a Leica DM 4000 B microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cord blood (CB) was obtained after informed consent from healthy full-term placentas according to institutional guidelines. Human CD34+ cells were purified from CB by positive selection using the midi-MACS immunomagnetic separation system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladabach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of CD34+ cells was assessed by flow cytometry using a monoclonal PE-conjugated anti-CD34 antibody and was routinely over 95 % (range comprised between 92–98 %). Purified human hematopoietic progenitor cells were grown in serum-free medium containing BSA (10 mg/ml), pure human transferrin (1 mg/ml), human low-density lipoproteins (40 μg/ml), insulin (10 μg/ml), sodium pyruvate (10–4 M), l-glutamine (2 × 10−3 M), rare inorganic elements (Sn, Ni, Va, Mo, and Mn) supplemented with iron sulfate (4 × 10−8 M), and nucleosides (10 μg/ml each). HPCs were induced into specific granulopoietic differentiation with IL-3 (1 unit/ml), granulocyte/monocyte CSF (0.1 ng/ml), and saturating amounts of G-CSF (500 units/ml). The differentiation stage of unilineage cultures was evaluated by MayGrunwald–Giemsa staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and cytologic analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Erythroid Differentiation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Erythroid differentiation was performed by flow cytometry using anti-Ter119 and anti-CD71 antibodies (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) as described previously (Zhang et al., 2018 (link)) on FACS LSR II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was used to exclude the dead cells. Data were analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Erythroid differentiation was also analyzed by cell morphology on cytospin slides stained with May-Grunwald/Giemsa staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Cell proliferation was determination by counting nucleated cells daily using crystal violet stain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification of Murine Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cells were purified from wild-type C57BL/6 mice, between 7 and 12 weeks of age, except Pre and Pro B cells, which were collected from 5- to 7-week-old mice. Bone marrow was collected from femurs and tibiae, and in some instances, hips. Lymph node cells were collected from the inguinal, axillary, brachial, mesenteric, and superficial cervical lymph nodes. Peritoneal cells were isolated by peritoneal lavage. Peripheral blood was collected from the retro-orbital plexus into Microtainer tubes containing EDTA (BD Biosciences). All procedures involving animals were approved by The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Animal Ethics Committee. Cells were purified according to the combination of monoclonal antibodies outlined in Tables S2 and S3 and then isolated on a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Except for extremely rare populations, a portion of the sample was resorted to confirm the final purity of the sample. In some experiments, sorted cell populations were transferred onto slides using a cytospin centrifuge and subsequently stained with May-Grunwald/Giemsa staining (Sigma-Aldrich) for morphological examination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Erythroid Differentiation of Infected Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infected cells were cultured in expansion medium at an initial cell density of 05 × 106 cells/ml for three days as previously described (Zhang et al, 2019 (link)), and collected daily for analyses. Proliferation of infected cells, which were GFP+, was determination by counting the nucleated cells with crystal violet stain using haemocytometers and then multiplying the percentage of GFP+ cells from flow cytometry analysis. Erythroid differentiation was performed as previously described (Zhang et al, 2018 (link), 2019 (link)). Briefly, cells were labelled with anti-CD71 and anti-Ter119 antibodies (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used to exclude dead cells. Infected GFP+ live cells were gated for erythroid differentiation analysis by flow cytometry using FACS LSR II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analysed with FlowJo (Tree Star, OR, USA). Erythroid differentiation was also analysed by cell morphology on cytospin slides stained with May-Grunwald/Giemsa staining (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!