The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

D max iiia diffractometer

Manufactured by Rigaku
Sourced in Japan

The D/max-IIIA diffractometer is a laboratory instrument designed for X-ray diffraction analysis. Its core function is to measure and analyze the diffraction patterns of materials when exposed to X-rays, providing information about the crystal structure and composition of the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using d max iiia diffractometer

1

Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were acquired on Nova NanoSEM 450 (10 kV). TEM images were examined by Tecnai G2-F20 (200 kV). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer model PHI 5600 XPS system; all peaks were standardized to C 1s line at 284.6 eV correction. Powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) was performed on a Rigaku D/max-IIIA diffractometer (Cu Kα, λ = 1.54056 Å) at room temperature. Electrochemical experiments were conducted on a CHI 760E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai CH Instruments Co., China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Synthesized Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structures of as-synthesized materials were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu Kα, λ = 1.54056 Å) with a Rigaku D/max-IIIA diffractometer at 293 K. The morphology and microstructure of the materials were characterized using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Quanta 200 FEG), and their detailed microstructure was further evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Model JEM-2011, JEOL, Japan) with a Rontec EDX system. XPS spectra were obtained using a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250. All of the XPS spectra were calibrated with the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV as the binding energy reference. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were obtained using a Bruker A300 spectrometer (microwave frequency = 9.74 GHz; modulation amplitude = 2 G; modulation frequency = 50 KHz; time constant = 10 ms; conversion time = 25 ms). The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were collected using KBr as the reference sample on a Spectrum Two FTIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA). The TG spectra were measured using a Labsys evo TG-DTA/DSC (Setram, Lyon, France). The Raman spectra were obtained using a Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, London, UK). N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were performed on an A Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer (Micromeritics, Georgia, USA) at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of LDH-AO Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The absorbance values of equilibrium solutions were measured using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (T6 New Century) at wavelength of 490 nm.
Powder XRD analyses were performed on a Rigaku D/max-IIIa diffractometer with a Ni-filtered CuKa radiation at 30 kV and 20 mA. Orientated samples were scanned from 3° to 70° at 8°/min with a scan step of 0.02°/step.
Scanning electron micrography (SEM) was recorded using a JEOL-IT300 Scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
Photoluminescence emission (PL) spectra were acquired on a fluorescence spectrophotometer (HITACHI, F4600) over the range of 500−700 nm with a photomultiplier tube operated at 800 V. A 150 W xenon lamp was used as the excitation source, at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm. The scan speed was set at 240 nm/min.
Molecular simulation was carried out under the module “Forcite” of Materials Studio 6.0 software to study the configuration of AO in the surface of LDH. The unit cell (R-3)41 (link) parameters were set at a = b = 3.046 Å, c = 22.78 Å, a = 90°, γ = 90°, and b = 120°42 (link). A series of 2 × 2 × 1 supercells were built. Three cycles were reiterated with each cycle made of 106 steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Relative Crystallinity of Lyophilized Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD patterns of lyophilized samples were measured using a D/Max-IIIA diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The tests were conducted under the conditions of 40 kV, 20 mA and the Cu Kα radiation wavelength of 0.1542 nm. The range of the diffraction angle was from 5° to 40° with a step-scan of 0.01°. The relative crystallinity (RC) was calculated using the following equation: RC(%)=AcAc+Aa×100%
where Ac represents the crystalline area, and Aa represents the amorphous area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thermal and Magnetic Properties Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification. Elemental (C, H, and N) analysis was conducted on an Elementar Micro cube elemental analyzer. Thermal analysis was performed in N2 at a heating rate of 5 °C/min using Labsys Evo TG-DTG/DSC. IR spectra with KBr pellet were recorded on PE Spectrum Two FT/IR spectrometer (400–4000 cm−1). PXRD measurements were recorded on a Rigaku D/max-IIIA diffractometer. Magnetic susceptibility was measured with a MPMS SQUID-XL magnetometer equipped with 5 T magnet within the temperature range of 2–300 K. Diamagnetic corrections were estimated using Pascal’s constants. AC susceptibility was measured and data were collected at increasing temperatures from 2 K to 10 K within frequencies ranging from 1 Hz to 1000 Hz and a drive frequency of 2.5 Oe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of B-Si Alloy Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase of the B–Si alloy after preparation was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD). A D/MAX-IIIA diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Cu Kα (λ = 1.54 Å) radiation was employed for this analysis. The scanning angle (2θ) was tested from 5° to 80°with step of 0.02°. A scanning electron microscope (QUANTA FEG 450, FEI, USA) was introduced to analyze the microstructures of different samples. Each bulk density was tested via Archimedes’ method to calculate the relative densities of different samples. The bending strengths of different samples after the experiment were evaluated through a three-point bending mode by using a computer-controlled electronic universal testing machine (QJ211S-10KN, produced by Shanghai Qingji Testing Instruments CO., LT, Shanghai, China). The span for the testing was 30 mm and the test-machine crosshead displacement rate was set at 0.5 mm/min, and at least five specimens were measured for each group of samples. The HVT-1000 micro hardness tester was employed to measure the Vickers hardness of the samples. The surfaces of the samples were polished before the test, the load was set at 9.8 N and held for 10 s; reported values were averaged from at least five measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!