The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using leo 912

1

Exosome Visualization by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The double-layer membrane structure exosomes were detected by TEM. For this, the exosome pellet was dissolved in deionized water (DW). Then, negative staining was performed using 10 μL of exosome suspension solution that was loaded on the grid and stained with 2% uranyl acetate. Finally, the samples were dried and directly put on the electron microscopy grid and visualized by a TEM microscopy (Zeiss Leo 912).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detailed Microscopy Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All confocal imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM880 (Zeiss objectives: 10x Plan apochromat 10x/0.45; 25x LD LC/Plan apochromat 25x/0.8 DIC; 63x Plan apochromat 63x/1.40) and Zeiss Zen Black software. Whole embryo bright-field or fluorescent images were done on a Zeiss AxioZoom setup and Zeiss Zen Pro Blue software. Sections were imaged on a AxioZoom or AxioImager.Z1 microscope and Zeiss Zen Pro Blue software. Fluorescence images were processed in ImageJ/Fiji (maximum intensity projections, reconstruction of tile scans, selection of indicated planes, brightness/contrast adjustment, merging of channels) (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). Brightfield images were adjusted for color balance, brightness and contrast using Adobe Photoshop. TEM imaging was done using a Zeiss Leo 912 transmission electron microscope. SEM imaging was done using a scanning electron microscope (Leo 1450 VP scanning). Electron microscopy including TEM (transmission electron microscopy) and SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images were adjusted for brightness and contrast, and pseudo-colored using Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive EV Characterization by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EV sample was fixed in 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS
at 4 °C overnight. Fixed EV were spread on carbon-coated
400-square-mesh copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA,
USA). After 20 min of incubation grids were washed with
PBS and post-fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde (w/v) in PBS for 5 min. After a series of washing steps using distilled water,
grids were incubated in a 3% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate (pH 4.5) that had been filtered through a 0.22 μm filter for 5 min. Grids were dried at room
temperature and examined with a transmission electron microscope (Leo 912;
Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
To analyze pEV and EV by electron microscopy, we have
purified these vesicles by different means, including iodixanol gradient
(Optiprep) and antibody-coupled bead isolation. In all cases the vesicles
appeared to have a similar structure and size as demonstrated in Supplement
Fig. 3C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histochemical and Ultrastructural Analysis of Skin and Lacrimal Gland

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histochemical analysis pieces (5–6 mm3) of skin and exorbital lacrimal gland from each animal (n = 8 for each experimental group) were embedded in paraffin. Serial paraffin sections (5 µm-thick) were stained with (1) 0.2% Toluidine blue in Walpole buffer at pH 4.2; (2) Alcian blue/safranin (AB/safranin) [18 (link)].
For electron microscopy, pieces of skin and exorbital lacrimal glands (3 mm3) were immersed in Karnovsky’s fixative in cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and then postfixed for 2 h in cacodylate buffer containing 1% osmium tetroxide [19 (link)]. Sections were examined using a Zeiss LEO-912 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanoparticle Uptake Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells have been seeded out in chamber slides and were incubated for 60 min and 24 h with a concentration of 1 mg/ml of each used nanoparticle. At the endpoints the cells have been washed with 0.1 M PBS buffer and fixed with yellow-fix mixture (2 % paraformaldehyde, 2 % glutaraldehyde, 0.02 % picric acid mixed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer). After this step fixation in 1 % osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer took place. Dehydration steps, involving washing in rising concentrations of alcohol, followed consecutively. The final steps of sample preparation involved embedding in EPON resin, ultra-thin-cutting (80–100 nm), staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and investigation in a LEO912 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The shape and size distribution of (functionalized) silica particles was investigated using a Nova Nano SEM 430 field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a ZEISS Leo912 transmission electron microscope (TEM) operated at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Zeta potential measurements and dynamic light scattering experiments were performed on aqueous dispersions using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments) at a wavelength of 633 nm in folded capillary zeta cells. UV-vis spectroscopy (LAMBDA 950 PerkinElmer) was used to determine the successful functionalization of nanoparticles with dye-labeled CPPs. The peptide concentration on the surface of silica particles was determined with the Roti-Nanoquant dye following the instructions provided with the product.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle Localization in PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To define the destination of the nanoparticles inside the cell, PBMCs were incubated with 1000 ng/g AgNPs for 28 days. Subsequently, the cells were fixed for 30 min on ice with 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2–7.4) with 2% glutardialdehyde and 0.02% picric acid, followed by a 20 min fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2–7.4). The samples were dehydrated and embedded in epon, an epoxy resin. Ultrathin cuts were prepared and applied to collodion coated copper grids. Examination was done using a LEO 912 transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Slow Scan Dual Speed CCD camera TRS Sharpeye (Albert Troendle Prototypentwicklung, Moorenweis, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electron Microscopy of Viral Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron microscopy was performed as previously described (Heilingloh et al., 2015 (link)). Briefly, in a first step, dialysis of H- and L-particle preparations against 20 mM HEPES was performed in a SnakeSkin pleated dialysis tube (10000-moleculare-weight cutoff, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, United States) overnight at 4°C. Afterward, particles were seeded on carbon-coated 400-square-mesh copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, United States) for 20 min at RT and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde. Finally, particles were stained with 1% uranyl acetate (diluted in 50% ethanol) for 10 min and subsequently with lead citrate for 5 min. For data analysis a transmission electron microscope (Leo 912; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Characterization of Retinal Cell Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eyes were collected and fixed in Karnovsky's fixative overnight at 4°C, washed in Ringer's saline and treated with 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M potassium-sodium phosphate buffer (PSPB) for 4 h at room temperature. Eyes were rinsed three times with PSPB and the cornea and lens were carefully removed. The remaining eyecups were cut into four equal pieces under a dissecting microscope. Eyecups were dehydrated in a graded concentration series of ethanol (50-100%) and then in propylene oxide (PO). Infiltration of eyecups was performed in PO/Spurr's resin (2:1 vol:vol, 2:2 vol:vol, then 100% resin; overnight at 4°C for each). Each eyecup quarter was embedded in Spurr's resin and polymerized in a 70°C oven overnight. Sectioning was performed using an ultramicrotome with a diamond knife, and sections were collected and placed on mesh copper grids. Sections were then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. TEM imaging was carried out using a LEO 912 (Zeiss) operating at 100 kV accelerating voltage. Sections from the peripheral retina were imaged and retinal cell types were identified by morphology, location and nuclear size (Jeon et al., 1998 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dinosaur Bone Vessel Extraction and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vessels were liberated from dinosaur femora cortical bone using EDTA, pH 8.0 (see methods in references [1 (link),2 ,6 (link)]), then either fixed in a solution of 2% paraformaldehyde: 0.01% gluteraldehyde, or left unfixed. Vessels were then rinsed and embedded in 6% agar (Sigma). Samples were rinsed, then dehydrated in ethanol series from 50% to 100%. Some material was post-fixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 hour. Samples were infiltrated with acetone, followed by 1:1 acetone:Spurrs embedding medium, then 100% Spurrs to infiltrate under vacuum overnight. Sections were cut to 60–90 nm and placed on Au 200 mesh EM grids. Some sections were post-stained in uranyl acetate:lead citrate, others were not stained. Sections were imaged using a ZEISS LEO 912 with an acceleration voltage of 100 kV, coupled to a Proscan 2048–2048 digital CCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!