The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistics software for windows version 21

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics software for Windows, Version 21.0, is a data analysis software that provides advanced statistical capabilities for professionals and researchers. It offers a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and visualization. The software is designed to help users gain insights from their data, make informed decisions, and communicate findings effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using spss statistics software for windows version 21

1

Cardiac Function Assessment in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as percentages for categorical data and mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables.
Comparison between groups (group 1: patients with left ventricle dysfunction; group 2: patients with normal left ventricle function after PVBD) was carried out by Student’s t-test for continuous normally distributed variables and the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables.
A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS Statistics for Windows software, version 21.0 (released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Retinal Function Changes in PRP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The mean value of a-wave and b-wave amplitude, as well as latency, were calculated and compared between the first and second PRP session, the first and third PRP sessions, and the second and third PRP sessions using paired t-test. In addition, the mean changes in the amplitude and latency of the three different laser sessions were compared with the pre-treatment and 6 weeks post-treatment sessions using the paired t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of USIG and MSIG Questionnaires

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used nonparametric statistical tests to compare the results of our USIG and MSIG questionnaires. Continuous and ordinal variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H-tests. To analyze categorical data, we used a chi-square test while correlations between variables were measured using a Spearman’s rho. Independent proportions z tests were used to compare proportions. Descriptive statistics include the total number and median (interquartile range [IQR]), where appropriate. A 2-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For all our data analysis, we used IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, version 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of Clinical Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical data. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test. Factors that were significant in univariate survival analysis were entered into the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to determine the independent predictors associated with survival. The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), was used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Psychological Well-being Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, Version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of the psychological well-being score. The Chi-square Test was used to analyze differences in categorical variables between girls and boys and between children with low and normal psychological well-being.
However, the Fisher's Exact Test was used when the numbers of children in some cells were small.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cardiac Geometry and Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± SD for normally distributed variables and/or as the median ± IQR for non-normally distributed variables. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS Statistics for Windows software, version 21.0 (released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Comparison between groups of patients was carried out by t tests for normally distributed continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U test for nonnormally distributed continuous variables, while the χ 2 test was used to compare categorical variables. When necessary, comparison between groups was performed using analysis of covariance to reduce the effect of confounding variables (age, heart rate, and blood pressure when appropriate). Correlation between variables was evaluated through linear regression analysis (for continuous variables) and logistic regression in the presence of dichotomous variables (e.g., presence/absence of LV geometric abnormality). To account for significant confounders, multiple regression analysis was performed when appropriate, with model tolerance > 0.70. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lung ultrasound vs. auscultation comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each subpleural consolidation had the cranio-caudal (CC) diameter measured by ultrasound, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the sizes of subpleural consolidations for auscultatory positive and auscultatory negative findings were compared. In hemithoraces with two or more subpleural consolidations, the largest was used for calculation of CI. McNemar's test was performed using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows software, version 21.0 (Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with calculation of the P-value between the two diagnostic modalities (LUS and auscultation). A P-value below 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fatty Acid Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean±s.d. A logarithmic transformation was performed for skewed variables. To assess differences between baseline and follow-up measurements, the paired samples t-test was used. To adjust the results of analyses of 23 individual FA levels in KOBS and DPS for multiple comparisons, Bonferroni correction was used and thus P-value <0.002 was considered statistically significant. Linear regression analysis, with weight loss and serum fasting insulin as independent variables, was used to estimate their effect on serum FA composition. For the analyses of subcutaneous adipose tissue mRNA expression in KOBS, the expression levels for each gene per sample in the custom gene panel were normalized based on the total number of aligned reads of the corresponding sample and the results are shown as percentage of total transcript reads. A nominal P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical significance for changes in FAs between the two study groups was calculated with independent samples t-test. There was homogeneity of variances for all FAs in independent samples t-test, as assessed by Levene's test, except for n-3 FAs (P=0.0002). The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, Version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), was used for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Assessing Renal Impairment and Polypharmacy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), was used to enter and analyze data. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and frequency and percentages were used to describe categorical variables. We computed the prevalence of renal impairment and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In univariate analysis, we used the Chi-square test to determine the association between renal impairment and polypharmacy. To identify factors associated with renal impairment, we utilized a multivariable Poisson regression model with robust variance, and the findings were reported as adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) with a 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). We chose this model because odds ratios obtained in cross-sectional studies using logistic regression may overestimate prevalence ratio when the outcome is prevalent [27 (link)]. The model included variables found to be relevant in the literature and those determined to be significant by univariate analysis. All P-values were two-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Weight Measurement Analysis Using SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics for Windows Software, version 21 (IBM Software, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the maximum, minimum, mean, and standard deviation values. The normality of the data was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Comparison of two and more than two groups was performed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by post hoc Tukey’s test. Repeated measurement analysis was also carried out for weight measurement analysis. All the p values of less than 0.05 were considered statically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!