The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

North carolina periodontal probe

Manufactured by Hu-Friedy
Sourced in United States

The North Carolina periodontal probe is a dental instrument used to measure the depth of periodontal pockets. It features a calibrated tip that allows for precise measurements of the space between the tooth and the gum.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using north carolina periodontal probe

1

Comprehensive Oral Health Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Complete clinical oral examinations were carried out by a calibrated dentist (Kappa coefficient ≥0.85). Six clinical measurements were taken per tooth in a single visit (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, disto-lingual, lingual, and mesio-lingual), for all the teeth present, excluding the third molars (a maximum of 168 sites per person) following the method described by Haffajee.[14 (link)]
Clinical assessment included plaque accumulation (0/1; undetected/detected), gingival redness (0/1), bleeding on probing (0/1), suppuration (0/1), pocket probing depth, and clinical attachment loss.[14 (link)] The pocket depth and clinical attachment loss measurements were taken twice by the same examiner at the same visit, and the mean of the two measurements was recorded to the nearest millimeter using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL). All measurements for a given subject were performed by the same examiner at each visit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Periodontal Evaluation After Oral Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PI, GI, PD, and CAL and subgingival sampling for microbiological analysis were evaluated in the baseline by a calibrated periodontist. GI and PI were dichotomic (presence or absence of changes in gingiva color to clinical observation or the presence or absence of visible plaque evaluated with a periodontal probe). PD was assessed on days 0 after surgery and 90 days after with a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) at six sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, distolingual, lingual, and mesiolingual), except for the third molar; these sites were also used to assess CAL and BoP (present or absent). On day 7, the suture was removed, and the PI, GI, saliva sample, and subgingival plaque were realized for microbiological analysis. These analyses were repeated at 21 and 90 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Clinical Periodontal Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standardized clinical monitoring was performed 3 weeks before microbiological monitoring. The subjects were submitted to a medical/dental anamnesis, and information regarding their age, gender, and smoking status was obtained. The clinical examination was performed by trained and calibrated periodontists. Clinical measurements were taken at six sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, disto-lingual, lingual, and mesio-lingual) on all teeth, with the exception of the third molars, as previously described (Haffajee et al., 1983 (link)). The clinical parameters were measured in the following order: (i) PD (mm), (ii) CAL (mm), and (iii) BOP after 30 s (0 or 1). The full-mouth clinical measurements included BOP, PD and CAL, which were recorded using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). Clinical assessments of the interdental spaces were performed using an IAP CURAPROX© colorimetric probe (Curaden, Kriens, Switzerland) and registered the diameter of all the interproximal spaces of four pairs of teeth (premolar-molar). At the end of the examination visit, the participants were instructed to brush their teeth 3 h before the sampling visit and not to drink, eat or practice oral hygiene during this period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Periodontal Treatment Outcomes Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At baseline, one previously calibrated periodontist (95.3% intra-examiner concordance) performed a complete periodontal examination on all participants. Periodontal biometric parameters were recorded at six sites per tooth (excluding third molars) using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, IL, USA). At the same sites, the presence of plaque [34 (link)] and BoP were recorded dichotomously. The number and percentage of PDs ≥ 4 mm and PDs ≥ 6 mm, the number of teeth, full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) were also recorded.
After clinical and radiographic examination, GP patients underwent a session of supragingival scaling and received oral hygiene instructions. Subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) were performed by a single trained clinician on a quadrant-wise protocol using hand instruments (Gracey curettes, Hu-Friedy) together with a magnetostrictive device (Cavitron Select, Dentsply, York, PA, USA). NST was completed within 28 days and afterwards patients were recalled every month for supragingival prophylaxis and oral hygiene reinforcement. The periodontal parameters described above were recorded again 3 months after the completion of NST. HI did not receive any treatment but oral hygiene instructions were reinforced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Periodontal Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two calibrated examiners, one from each center (UNG and UFPR), are performing the clinical evaluations and collection of biofilm, GCF, and blood samples. The following periodontal parameters are being evaluated: visible plaque [52 (link)], gingival bleeding (0/1), BOP (0/1), SUP (0/1), PD (mm), and CAL (mm) at six sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, distolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal and mesiolingual/palatal) in all teeth, excluding third molars. PD and CAL measurements are rounded to the nearest millimeter using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Oral Health Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects were submitted to a medical/dental anamnesis, and information regarding age, gender, ethnicity/color, and smoking status was obtained. Clinical examination was performed by 2 trained and calibrated examiners (D. H. and C.M.S.B). In a group of 10 individuals who did not participate in this study, pairs of examinations were conducted in each individual with a 1-hour interval between them. Intraclass correlation coefficients for pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were calculated at the sites level. Intra- and inter-examiner coefficient s for CAL ranged between 0.90 and 0.97, and for PD, between 0.80 and 0.94. Full-mouth clinical measurements included presence/absence of visible supragingival biofilm, suppuration, bleeding on probing (BOP), PD and CAL recorded using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Clinical Oral Health Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurement of clinical parameters was performed by a calibrated clinician. Plaque index (PI) [42 (link)], gingival index (GI) [42 (link)], bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) (mm), and clinical attachment level (CAL) (mm) were measured at six sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, distolingual/distopalatinal, lingual/palatinal, and mesiolingual/mesiopalatinal) in all teeth, excluding third molars. BOP was recorded as present or absent if there were signs of bleeding within 30 s after PPD and CAL measurements. Subsequently, the PPD and CAL measurements were recorded to the nearest millimeter using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). The cementoenamel junction was detected by probing the cervical area of each tooth and was used to calculate the CAL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peri-implantitis Clinical Parameter Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During screening, clinical parameters including PPD, BOP (present = 1, absent = 0) and REC (relative to the implant abutment junction) were measured at six sites per implant with a calibrated probe (North Carolina periodontal probe, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). An IR (i.e. less than 3 months old) was used to determine the bone loss at the peri-implantitis sites. All initial and post-operative clinical measurements were carried out by a single examiner (M.C.H.) who was blinded to the study groups. A prior measurement of PPD in 20 implants with peri-implantitis (not included in the study) was repeated three times for intra-examiner calibration resulting in an intra‐agreement coefficient of κ = 0.86. Evaluation of clinical parameters was repeated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomization by the same clinician that performed the measurements during screening. Additionally a Patient’s Oral Health related Quality of Life questionnaire (OHIP-14) was completed by each patient, blood samples were taken and a CBCT was performed at these visits.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Oral Health Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One examiner performed the clinical monitoring and carried out all clinical measurements in a given subject. Visible plaque (0/1), gingival bleeding (0/1), BOP (0/1), suppuration (0/1), PD and CAL were measured at six sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, distolingual, lingual and mesiolingual) in all teeth, excluding third molars. PD and CAL measurements were recorded to the nearest millimeter using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Periodontal Clinical Evaluation and Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two calibrated examiners (B.R.V. and L.S.), one from each center (UNG and USP-SP), perform the clinical evaluations and sample collection. The following parameters are evaluated during clinical examination: visible plaque [20 (link)], gingival bleeding (0/1), BOP (0/1), suppuration (0/1), PD (mm) and CAL (mm) at six sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, distolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal and mesiolingual/palatal) in all teeth, excluding third molars. PD and CAL measurements are rounded to the nearest millimeter using a North Carolina periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
The two examiners were trained and calibrated prior to and during the trial, in order to achieve maximum reproducibility in the measurements. The methodology used for the inter-examiner and intra-examiner calibration was recommended by Araujo et al. [21 (link)], where the standard error of measurement for continuous periodontal clinical parameters (PD and CAL) is evaluated. For the other clinical variables, the average level of agreement between the examiners is determined and considered satisfactory when greater than 90% (Kappa test).
Clinical measurements and microbiological assessment are performed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post-therapy. Immunological assessment is conducted at baseline and 12 months post-therapy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!