The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using jem 2010hr

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline structure of the samples was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD MAC Science, MXP18, Japan). The morphology of the as-synthesized samples was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL JEM-2010HR) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2010HR). N2 adsorption isotherms were measured using an AUTOSORB-IQ (Quantachrome Instruments, USA). UV-vis absorption spectra were acquired with an UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-5800PC, Shanghai Metash Instruments Co., Ltd).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Structural and Chemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline structure of samples was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD MAC Science, MXP18, Japan). The morphology of the as-synthesized samples was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL JEM-2010HR) and transition electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-2010HR). N2 adsorption isotherms were measured using an AUTOSORB-IQ (Quantachrome Instruments, USA). Raman spectra were measured on a Renishaw Raman confocal microscopy spectrometer (model 2000, Renishaw, London, UK). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using an Al K monochromatized source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to acquire elemental information. The laser power was 40 mW, and the excitation wavelength was 514.5 nm. A tube furnace (OTF-1200X, Hefeikejing, Hefei, China) was used for the annealing. The heating rate was 5 K min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Materials Characterization by XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, and UV-Vis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement
was conducted on a PANalytical, PW3040/60 diffractometer with monochromatized
Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). The surface morphology
and crystal microstructure of the as-prepared samples were examined
using a field-emission SEM (FE-SEM, JEOL JSM-7001F) equipped with
an energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) device and TEM (JEM2010-HR).
Surface electronic states and compositions of the sample were analyzed
by XPS (ESCALab250). The UV–vis DRS of the samples were obtained
over a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Cary 300) using BaSO4 as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of BPNS and BATNS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of BPNS, BATNS were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2010HR, JEOL, Japan) operating at 120 kV. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was performed on Bruker Diension Icon microscope. The size and zeta potential of BPNS, BATNS were measured by Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90. The structures of BPNS, BATNS were determined by Raman scattering, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Axis HSi, Kratos Ltd., UK), UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometry (Lambda 950, PerkinElmer, UK), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) and Micro infrared spectrophotometry. The surface morphology and elemental distributions were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PAMAM-Endostatin Plasmid Complexation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of the PAMAM-Es plasmid mixture was performed according to the Dendritech Company guidelines. Six PAMAM dendrimers were dissolved in water at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and stored at 4°C. The human recombined endostatin plasmid was stored at −20°C. When used, the PAMAM solution and the endostatin plasmid were both rewarmed in room temperature on the bench for 20 min and mixed together at a ratio of 3.25 μg : 1 μg (PAMAM : endostation). After 20 min of coincubation, the mixture was identified by JEM-2010HR transmission electron microscopy (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
As a traditional gene vector, Lipofectamine 2000 was taken to compare with PAMAM in both in vitro and in vivo studies. The preparation of the Lipofectamine-endostatin plasmid mixture (Lipo-Es) was in accordance with the routine of our laboratory. Briefly, Lipofectamine 2000 and endostatin plasmid were rewarmed in room temperature on the bench top for 20 min and mixed together at a ratio of 3.25 μg : 1 μg and cultured for another 20 min before injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TEM images were taken by using a JEM-2010HR transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with a tungsten filament at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis spectroscopy (EDAX) were performed on an FEI Tecnai G2 F30 transmission electron microscope (at 300 kV, FEI, USA). Magnetic measurements were carried out on a magnetic property measurement system (MPMS XL-7, Quantum Design, San Diego, USA). The UV-vis absorption of different nanoparticle samples was measured with a UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3150, Shimadzu, Japan). The hydrodynamic size and surface potential of the nanoparticles were determined in aqueous phase by using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). The r2 relaxivity was determined by a linear fitting of 1/T2 as a function of the Fe concentration of the particles. The instrumental parameters were set as follows: point resolution of 156 × 156 mm2, section thickness of 2 mm, TR of 5000 ms and number of signal acquisitions of 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Supo HHS-6 electro-thermostatic water bath and the Evela N-1200A rotary evaporator were used. The freeze-drying method was operated by Biosafer Biosafer-10A and Christ Alpha 1–2 LD plus vacuum freeze-dryers. The size distribution and zeta potential were determined using a Malvern Zetasizer nano ZS analyzer. The UV used a Shimadzu UV-2600 UV-vis spectrophotometer, and the ATR-FTIR used a Perkin Elmer Spectrum two infrared analyzer. The JEOL JEM-2010HR was operated for TEM observation.
The cell cycles were performed by a Beckman CytoFLEX S flow cytometry analyzer. Cell proliferation was determined with a Multiskan FC ThermoFisher microplate reader. The quantitative RT-PCR was conducted with 7500 apparatus, Applied Biosystems (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Tumor and Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors and thigh muscles were cryopreserved and embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue‐Tek, SAKURA Finetek USA, Torrance, CA) for immunofluorescence staining. Five‐µm sections were incubated with anti‐CD31 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti‐α‐smooth muscle actin (SMA; Abcam) antibodies to detect endotheliocytes and pericytes, respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). A pericyte‐positive microvessel was defined as a CD31‐positive microvessel surrounded by at least one cell staining positive for α‐SMA.
For the ultrastructural observations, specimens were prepared as described elsewhere26 and slides were visualized under a transmission electron microscope (JEM‐2010HR, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Freeze-Fracture TEM Analysis of UB-NLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy (FF-TEM) was employed to characterize the morphology of UB-NLC [40 (link),41 (link),42 (link),43 (link),44 (link)]. For freeze-fracture (FF) measurements, droplets of the sample were dropped onto a specimen holder and frozen via a rapid plunge into liquid nitrogen. Then, samples were fractured and replicated using a freeze-etching apparatus (Balzers BAF 400D, Balzers, Liechtenstein). Platinum-carbon was deposited to shadow the replicas. Finally, the prepared samples were loaded onto copper grids and then observed by a transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM-2010HR, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrochemical Characterization of Supercapacitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) measurements were carried out using a CHI 760D potentiostat (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) in both the three-electrode system and asymmetrical two-electrode configurations. In a three-electrode system, a saturated Ag/AgCl and a platinum (Pt) wire were used as reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. For electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), the amplitude signal was 5 mV, and the frequency was scanned from the 10 kHz to 5 mHz. All the electrochemical measurements were performed in a 5 M LiCl solution at room temperature. The areal capacitance (CA) of the supercapacitor was calculated from the CV curves on the basis of the following equation: CA=S2ΔVAv
where S stands for the integral area of CV curves, v presents the scan rate, ΔV is the potential window, and A refers to the surface area of electrodes.
An X-ray diffractometer (D8 ADVANCE) (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to study the phases of the samples. The samples underwent morphological analysis by using field emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-6330F) (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (JEM2010-HR) (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!