The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistical software 17

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS statistical software 17.0 is a data analysis and statistical software package developed by IBM. The software provides a range of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting, catering to the needs of researchers, analysts, and data-driven decision-makers. The core function of SPSS 17.0 is to enable users to perform advanced statistical analysis, model creation, and data visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

47 protocols using spss statistical software 17

1

Statistical Analysis of Lupus Nephritis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results of all groups were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5 software (La Jolla, CA, USA) or SPSS-17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Mann–Whitney non-parametric test was used to compare LN patients with control groups. For statistical analysis between treatments, paired one-way Friedman test was used with Bonferroni post-hoc test over the ranked data. P < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biochemical Analysis of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was repeated at least three times. All values were expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS-17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means were separated using Duncan’s least significance difference test at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analysis of Chemical Components and Biological Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from the analysis of chemical components of GEJ-WE were from three different batches and expressed as mean ± SD. Data from cellular and animal studies were generated from 6 independent in vitro experiments or 6 mice per group (n = 6, where n represented the number of independent values as reported in each figure legend) and expressed as mean ± SEM. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were analysed one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was considered as p < 0.05. P value for statistical significance was not varied later in Results. For reducing unwanted sources of variation, we used ‘percentage matched control values’ to normalize the data of MTT assay, western blotting and qRT-PCR experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analysis of Experimental Variance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was repeated three times. All values were expressed as means ± SD. The data were analyzed via one-way ANOVA using SPSS-17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), followed by Duncan’s tests. A p-value of <0.05 indicated a significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least 3 replicates. SPSS 17 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVAs, with Fisher's least significant difference post-hoc tests used to determine the differences between groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Factors Associated with Positive Viral Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed using SPSS 17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All tests were two-sided and values of P <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Participants who tested positive for PN or PV were recorded as being in the PNV group. The t-test and chi-square method for testing the mean difference and equality of proportions were used to compare the personal factors or health-promoting behavior with or without PNV. To investigate the potentially determinant factors associated with PNV, the variables that were significant (P <0.05) on previous univariate analyses (t-test or chi-square test) were further introduced into a multivariable logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise selection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Correlating CEP55 Overexpression and Clinicopathological Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The χ2 test was chosen to analyze correlations between CEP55 overexpression and clinicopathological factors. Univariate analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. The log–rank test was used to calculate survival rate. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. If the P‐value was less than 0.05, differences were considered significant. Statistical data were obtained using SPSS 17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test using SPSS17 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Analysis of Biomarker Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed using SPSS 17 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons between groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance, and p < 0.05 was recognized as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 17 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data processing. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between the groups were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance followed by Least Significant Difference multiple comparison, or by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, according to the results of the homogeneity of variance test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!