The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Foundation 3

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Thermo Fisher Scientific Foundation 3.1 is a versatile lab equipment designed for various applications. It features a compact and durable construction, with a focus on delivering reliable performance. The core function of this product is to provide a stable and controlled environment for various laboratory processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using foundation 3

1

Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Obtained mass spectrometry data were handled using Xcalibur 3.1 with Foundation 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) value of 100 was considered to detect m/z peaks, and exported peak lists were further processed using Microsoft Excel. Elemental formulas for the detected m/z peaks were assigned within typical conditions of CcHhNnOo, counting c unlimited, h unlimited, and 0 ≤ n ≤ 10, and 0 ≤ o ≤ 50 using MIDAS Formula Calculator. ChemDraw Professional 15.0 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to draw the structures of the identified compounds. A Venn diagram for the overlapped peaks was generated by FunRich 3.1.3 [74 (link)].
Compound identification was executed by comparing theoretically calculated masses of [M–H] and [M+Cl] adducts with the observed m/z peak values. For the structural elucidation of the detected phytochemicals, ESI–MS/MS- and APCI–MS/MS-produced fragments of the target peaks were compared with the Human Metabolome Database (online database) [15 (link)] and literatures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mass Spectrometry-Based Compound Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectral data obtained from the orbitrap MS were processed using Xcalibur 3.1 with Foundation 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Compounds were tentatively identified by matching their exact (calculated) masses of protonated (M + H) adducts with measured m/z values and PSI-MS/MS fragmentation patterns from the in-house MS/MS database, and online databases such as the Human Metabolome Database [15 (link)] and METLIN [16 (link)], and the literature. The compound structures were drawn using ChemDraw Professional 15.0 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

MALDI-ToF/ToF Mass Spectrometry Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were
performed using a 5800 MALDI-ToF/ToF analyzer (AB SCIEX, Darmstadt,
Germany) equipped with a neodymium-doped yttrium lithium fluoride
(Nd:YLF) laser (345 nm), in a reflectron positive mode, with a typical
mass accuracy of 10 ppm. In MS and MS/MS modes, 1000 laser shots were
typically accumulated by a random rastering pattern, at laser pulse
rates of 400 and 1000 Hz, respectively; each shown mass spectrum was
averaged on at least five single mass spectra (1000 laser shots each).
The laser fluences were within 1.9–2.6 J/m2 depending
on the matrix employed. MS/MS experiments were performed setting a
potential difference of 1 kV between the source and the collision
cell; ambient air was used as the collision gas with a medium pressure
of 10–6 Torr. The delayed extraction time was set
at 280 ns.
DataExplorer software 4.0 (AB Sciex) was used to
control the acquisitions and to perform the initial elaboration of
data, whereas SigmaPlot 11.0 was used to graph the final mass spectra.
ChemDraw Pro 8.0.3 (CambridgeSoft Corporation, Cambridge, MA) was
employed to draw chemical structures. Isotopic pattern contribution
was generated by Xcalibur 4.0 with Foundation 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolite Identification Using Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrum data acquired from the orbitrap mass spectrometer were organized using Xcalibur 3.1 along with foundation 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Rockford, IL, USA). The m/z peaks were tentatively identified by matching their exact (theoretical) masses of deprotonated (M-H) adducts with measured m/z values and ESI-MS/MS fragmentation patterns from an in-house MS/MS database, and online databases such as FooDB (https://foodb.ca/, accessed date 2 April 2021) and METLIN database (https://metlin.scripps.edu/landing_page.php?pgcontent=mainPage, accessed date 2 April 2021). Compound structures were drawn using ChemDraw Professional 15.0 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mass spectral data was analyzed with Xcalibur 3.1 with Foundation 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The detected m/z peaks were identified by comparing the exact masses of monoisotopic (negative mode) masses and ESI-MS/MS breakage patterns from an online database and as in-house MS/MS database. The online databases included FooDB [31 (link)], METLIN [32 (link)], and CFM-ID 4.0 [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!