Compound identification was executed by comparing theoretically calculated masses of [M–H]− and [M+Cl]− adducts with the observed m/z peak values. For the structural elucidation of the detected phytochemicals, ESI–MS/MS- and APCI–MS/MS-produced fragments of the target peaks were compared with the Human Metabolome Database (online database) [15 (link)] and literatures.
Foundation 3
The Thermo Fisher Scientific Foundation 3.1 is a versatile lab equipment designed for various applications. It features a compact and durable construction, with a focus on delivering reliable performance. The core function of this product is to provide a stable and controlled environment for various laboratory processes.
5 protocols using foundation 3
Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis
Compound identification was executed by comparing theoretically calculated masses of [M–H]− and [M+Cl]− adducts with the observed m/z peak values. For the structural elucidation of the detected phytochemicals, ESI–MS/MS- and APCI–MS/MS-produced fragments of the target peaks were compared with the Human Metabolome Database (online database) [15 (link)] and literatures.
Mass Spectrometry-Based Compound Identification
MALDI-ToF/ToF Mass Spectrometry Analyses
performed using a 5800 MALDI-ToF/ToF analyzer (AB SCIEX, Darmstadt,
Germany) equipped with a neodymium-doped yttrium lithium fluoride
(Nd:YLF) laser (345 nm), in a reflectron positive mode, with a typical
mass accuracy of 10 ppm. In MS and MS/MS modes, 1000 laser shots were
typically accumulated by a random rastering pattern, at laser pulse
rates of 400 and 1000 Hz, respectively; each shown mass spectrum was
averaged on at least five single mass spectra (1000 laser shots each).
The laser fluences were within 1.9–2.6 J/m2 depending
on the matrix employed. MS/MS experiments were performed setting a
potential difference of 1 kV between the source and the collision
cell; ambient air was used as the collision gas with a medium pressure
of 10–6 Torr. The delayed extraction time was set
at 280 ns.
DataExplorer software 4.0 (AB Sciex) was used to
control the acquisitions and to perform the initial elaboration of
data, whereas SigmaPlot 11.0 was used to graph the final mass spectra.
ChemDraw Pro 8.0.3 (CambridgeSoft Corporation, Cambridge, MA) was
employed to draw chemical structures. Isotopic pattern contribution
was generated by Xcalibur 4.0 with Foundation 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Metabolite Identification Using Mass Spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!