The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata versions

Manufactured by StataCorp

STATA is a statistical software package used for data analysis, visualization, and modeling. STATA versions offer a range of features and capabilities to meet the needs of researchers, analysts, and professionals across various fields. The core function of STATA is to provide a comprehensive set of tools for data management, statistical analysis, and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using stata versions

1

Meta-analysis of CCND1 G870A and Cervical Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The strength of the association between CCND1 G870A polymorphism and cervical cancer was evaluated by ORs with 95% CI, comprised with allele contrast (A vs. G), codominant model (GA vs. GG, AA vs. GG), dominant model (GA + AA vs. GG), and recessive model (AA vs. GG + GA). The HWE of the control group was assessed, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant disequilibrium. Stratified analyses were used to evaluate ethnicity, study design, and genotyping type technique. Heterogeneity was explored with the use of a chi-squared test, and the quantity of heterogeneity was measured by the I2 statistic. I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% represent low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. The OR of each model was estimated by using the fixed-effects model (Mantel–Haenszel method) when I2 ≤ 50%; otherwise, the random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess potential covariates that can predict intertribal heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed on the basis of modified Egger’s bias test and Begg’s funnel plot. Statistical analysis was performed by using STATA versions 11.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Two-sided P value (P < 0.05) was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Assessing Social Media Use and Help-Seeking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We first examined missingness of data; all survey items had less than 2% missing data. We used mean imputation for missing responses to GHSQ items that were part of informal or formal help-seeking. We summarized key variables using descriptive statistics. We analyzed sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants who were Facebook users and nonusers using 2-sample t tests and Pearson Chi-square tests. To compare help-seeking intentions from different GHSQ source categories, we used multilevel mixed-effects linear regressions. We performed subgroup analyses to determine whether the pattern of help-seeking intentions differed when the sample was restricted to various groups of participants, including frequent Facebook users (defined as visiting at least daily), active Facebook users (defined as sharing, posting, or commenting on Facebook at least daily), and users of social media platforms other than Facebook. Analyses were performed using Stata versions 14.2 and 15.0 (StataCorp LLC), and 2-sided statistical significance was defined as P<.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!