The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

858 minibiox 2

Manufactured by MTS Systems
Sourced in United States

The 858 Minibiox II is a compact and versatile laboratory equipment designed for various applications. It features a high-accuracy temperature control system and can accommodate a range of sample sizes. The 858 Minibiox II is intended for use in research and testing environments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using 858 minibiox 2

1

Rat Mandibular Biomechanics Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following μCT, rats underwent biomechanical testing. The mandibles were harvested en-bloc, split between the incisors, and frozen at −20°C until testing. The posterior aspect of the mandible was placed into an open cylindrical shaped “pot” using a heated bismuth alloy (Cerrobend, Cerro Products, Bellefont, PA, USA) that, once cooled, secured the mandible in place. The potted mandibles were loaded to failure in uniaxial monotonic tension at 0.5 mm/s using a servohydraulic testing machine (858 Minibiox II; MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Crosshead displacement was recorded by using an external variable differential transducer (LVDT; Lucas Schavitts, Hampton, VA, USA), and load data were collected with a 100-lb load cell (Sensotec, Columbus, OH, USA). Data were sampled at 200 Hz on a TestStar system (TestStar IIs System version 2.4; MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Load-displacement curves were analyzed for whole bone ultimate load (UL), intrinsic stiffness (S), yield load (Y), failure load (FL), and elastic energy using custom computational code (MATLAB 7.11; Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mechanical Characterization of Mandibles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After imaging, both the anterior and posterior ends of the mandibles were potted in bismuth and loaded to failure in uniaxial monotonic tension at 0.5 mm/s using a servohydraulic testing machine (858 Minibiox II; MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Crosshead displacement was recorded by using an external variable differential transducer (LVDT; Lucas Schavitts, Hampton, VA, USA), and load data were collected with a 100-lb load cell (Sensotec, Columbus, OH, USA). Data were sampled at 200 Hz on a TestStar system (TestStar IIs System version 2.4; MTS Systems Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Load-displacement curves were analyzed for whole bone yield load (Y), failure energy (E), ultimate load (UL), failure load (FL) and elastic energy (EE) using custom computational code (MATLAB 7.11; Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Femur Mechanical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Femurs were loaded to failure in four-point bending at 0.5 mm/s in the anterior-posterior direction using a servohydraulic testing machine (858 Minibiox II; MTS Systems Corporation) with the posterior side in tension between upper and lower supports that were 2.2 mm and 6.35 mm apart, respectively. All bones were tested at room temperature and kept moist with PBS. Crosshead displacement was recorded by using an external variable differential transducer (LVDT; Lucas Schavitts), and load data were collected with a 50-lb. load cell (Sensotec) at a sampling frequency of 2048 Hz. Load-displacement curves were analyzed for whole bone stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, elastic energy, plastic energy, total energy to failure, and displacement ratio (ratio of failure displacement to yield displacement) using custom computational code (MATLAB 7.11; Mathworks Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Femur Mechanical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Femurs were loaded to failure in four-point bending at 0.5 mm/s in the anterior-posterior direction using a servohydraulic testing machine (858 Minibiox II; MTS Systems Corporation) with the posterior side in tension between upper and lower supports that were 2.2 mm and 6.35 mm apart, respectively. All bones were tested at room temperature and kept moist with PBS. Crosshead displacement was recorded by using an external variable differential transducer (LVDT; Lucas Schavitts), and load data were collected with a 50-lb. load cell (Sensotec) at a sampling frequency of 2048 Hz. Load-displacement curves were analyzed for whole bone stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, elastic energy, plastic energy, total energy to failure, and displacement ratio (ratio of failure displacement to yield displacement) using custom computational code (MATLAB 7.11; Mathworks Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mandibular Mechanical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After imaging, mandibles were potted and loaded to failure in uniaxial monotonic tension at 0.5 mm/s using a servohydraulic testing machine (858 Minibiox II; MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Crosshead displacement was recorded by using an external variable differential transducer (LVDT; Lucas Schavitts, Hampton, VA, USA), and load data were collected with a 100-lb load cell (Sensotec, Columbus, OH, USA). Data were sampled at 200 Hz on a TestStar system (TestStar IIs System version 2.4; MTS Systems Corporation). Load-displacement curves were analyzed for whole bone yield (Y), stiffness (S), ultimate load (UL) and failure load (FL) using custom computational code (MATLAB 7.11; Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Femoral Four-Point Bending Biomechanics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four-point bending was conducted as described (5 (link)). Briefly, after nanoCT scanning, femora were loaded to failure in the anterior-posterior direction at 0.5 mm/s using a servohydraulic testing machine with upper and lower supports 6.26 and 2.085 mm apart, respectively (858 Minibiox II; MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN). The posterior side was in tension. Crosshead displacement was recorded using an external variable differential transducer (LVDT; Lucas Schavitts, Hampton, VA), and load data collected with a 50-lb load cell (Sensotec, Columbus, OH) at a sampling frequency of 2,048 Hz. Load-displacement curves were analyzed for whole bone stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, elastic energy, plastic energy, total energy to failure and post-yield displacement using custom computational code (MATLAB 7.11; Mathworks, Natick, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!