The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

59 protocols using zen blue edition software

1

GISH Analysis of Monococcum Metaphase Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GISH analysis of mitotic metaphase chromosomes was performed according to a previously described fluorescence in situ hybridization protocol with minor modifications[33 (link),44 (link)]. Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of a T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides accession, KU-3620. Genomic DNA of KU-3620 was labeled using Biotin-Nick Translation Mix (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), incubated at 16°C for 24 h, and then digested with the restriction enzyme HaeIII at 37°C for 5 h. The biotin-labeled DNA was used as a probe. After chromosomes were incubated in 2× SSC (saline-sodium citrate) buffer including 70% (v/v) formamide at 80°C for 2 min for denaturation, they were hybridized with the biotin-labeled probe. The biotin-labeled probe was visualized using streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 555 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Chromosomes were counterstained with 0.1 μg/ml 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). GISH signals and DAPI-stained chromosomes were captured using a fluorescence microscope (Axioskop2, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were pseudo-colored and processed using ZEN software blue edition (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TTC Staining for Infarct Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were euthanized and decapitated 24 h after the MCAO operation. Brains were dissected and cut into 2 mm coronal sections. Brain sections were incubated in 2% TTC (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in PBS for 10 min at 37 °C. After washing by 1 × PBS, the brain sections were fixed in 4% PFA for 2 h. The images of stained sections were captured under a stereo-microscope (Stemi 2000-C, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (AxioCam ERc 5s, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). The ischemic area was determined by measuring the regions that were not stained by TTC using ZEN software (Blue Edition, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of proliferating and differentiated cells was performed on 5 random fields of view (FOVs) on each of the two stained coverslips, making a total of 10 FOVs per condition. FOVs were determined in the DAPI channel. The images were acquired at ×200 magnification, capturing an average of 120 cells per FOV, using a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 microscope and Zeiss ZEN software (blue edition). BrdU+, β-III-tubulin+, GFAP+ and DAPI+ cells were counted using Adobe Photoshop®. The proportion of proliferating or differentiated cells per experiment was determined by quantifying the number of BrdU+ cells or β-III-tubulin+ and GFAP+ cells relative to the total number of cells (DAPI+ cells), with one data point referring to the average value of 10 FOVs. A total of ~1200 cells per condition were analysed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cytospin, May-Grünwald, and Giemsa Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were cytospun on microscopic slides using a StatSpin Cytofuge 2 (1000 rpm, 2 min) and left to dry overnight. Slides were stained with May-Grünwald stain (50% working solution, 5 min) and, subsequently, Giemsa stain (10% working solution, 20 min). Morphology was examined using AxioVert 200 microscope and images were photographed using Axiocam MRc 5 camera and ZEN software, blue edition (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of proliferating and differentiated cells was performed on 5 random fields of view (FOVs) on each of the two stained coverslips, making a total of 10 FOVs per condition. FOVs were determined in the DAPI channel. The images were acquired at ×200 magnification, capturing an average of 120 cells per FOV, using a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 microscope and Zeiss ZEN software (blue edition). BrdU+, β-III-tubulin+, GFAP+ and DAPI+ cells were counted using Adobe Photoshop®. The proportion of proliferating or differentiated cells per experiment was determined by quantifying the number of BrdU+ cells or β-III-tubulin+ and GFAP+ cells relative to the total number of cells (DAPI+ cells), with one data point referring to the average value of 10 FOVs. A total of ~1200 cells per condition were analysed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optic Nerve Axon Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-μm-thick cross-sections of the optic nerve embedded in epoxy resin were used for imaging-based axon quantification in a masked fashion similar to our previous studies [25 (link)]. Images of the toluidine blue-stained sections were collected as non-overlapping tile images using Zeiss AxioObserver.Z1 microscope for wide-field fluorescence microscopy (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) and the Zen software (Blue Edition; Carl Zeiss) to allow axon counts representing the entire surface area of cross-sections as previously described [25 (link)]. Axon counting was performed by a researcher masked for the experimental group. After image acquisition, nerve outlines were manually traced on mosaics of images. Image processing determined the size and shape parameters to exclude intervening glia, myelin debris, and highly degenerated axons. The axon loss was determined by the ratio of axon counts in ocular hypertensive eye to normotensive fellow eye.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescence Imaging of Skin Microemulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A CLSM study of whole skin and sectioned tissue was performed with an inverted Zeiss LSM 800 with Airyscan (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) using a 10× objective lens. To visualize the fluorescence localizations of the rhodamine B base-loaded NBD-PE probed microemulsions on the skin surface, treated skin was placed onto a 22 mm × 50 mm coverslip (MENZEL-GLÄSER®, Braunschweig, Germany) using a small volume of PBS as an immersion medium by orienting the epidermis toward the objective lens (EC Plan Neofluar 10×), which was equipped with four diode lasers. Green fluorescence (dye name AF488) was detected at excitation and emission wavelengths of 493 and 517 nm, respectively. Red fluorescence (dye name AF568) was detected at excitation and emission wavelengths of 577 and 603 nm, respectively. The sectioned tissue was observed using the same objective lens, for which the blue fluorescence from DAPI staining was detected at excitation and emission wavelengths of 353 and 465 nm, respectively. The fluorescence intensities of the image were analyzed by Zen software (Blue edition, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Epifluorescence and Confocal Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epifluorescent images were collected by a fully automated slide scanner (AxioScan.Z1, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with an LED Light Source (Colibri 7, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The appropriate excitation and emission filters (excitation/emission wavelengths in nm) were set as: 353/465 (DAPI), 488/509 (green), 548/561 (red), and 650/673 (infrared). A Plan-Apochromat 10 ×/0.45 objective for pre-focusing and a Plan-Apochromat 20 ×/0.8 objective for fine focus image acquisition was used. Offline image stitching (8 μm stacks, variance projection) for overviews of brain slices and further analysis was performed using ZEN software (Blue Edition, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Confocal images were taken using a laser-scanning microscope (LSM-710, Zeiss) as previously described [23 (link)]. Figures presented in this work were modified with Zen 1 software (Black Edition, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytological Staining Protocol for Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were cytospun on microscopic slides (1000 rpm, 2 min) using StatSpin Cytofuge 2 (BeckmanCoulter, Marseille, France) and left to dry overnight. Slides were stained with May-Grünwald stain (50% working solution, 5 min) and, subsequently, Giemsa stain (10% working solution, 20 min). Morphology was examined using AxioVert 200 microscope and images were obtained using AxioCam MRc 5 camera and ZEN software, blue edition (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualizing GFP-tagged PDE5 Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild type cells grown in YPD medium to late exponential phase were transformed with GFP-tagged PDE5 constructs and selected on YPD plated supplemented with 100 μg/mL G418. Transformed cells were stained with 100 nM MitoTracker (CMTMRos MitoTracker Orange, #M7510 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions, to visualize mitochondrial compartment. Nuclei were stained with 2.5 μg/mL DAPI (Thermo Fisher). Cells from three independent experiments were visualized using a Zeiss LSM 800 System using the 488 (EGFP) and 576 nm (MitoTracker; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) laser lines with corresponding band-path filters. Image recording was optimized using the Zeiss Zen Software Blue edition (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Images were acquired with a 20× PanFluor Objective (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) and imported into ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), background was subtracted, and 16 fields (10 cells/field) for each condition were used to determine Pearson’s correlation coefficient (p) expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated using the ANOVA one-way test with Holm–Sidak’s post hoc comparison. ** p = 0.007 (PDE5A2 vs. PDE5A1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!