The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using gentamicin

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility was determined on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) by the disk diffusion method and interpreted according to the EUCAST [47 ]. The following antimicrobial agents were tested: oxacillin, cefoxitin, gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France) and penicillin G (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The inducible resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) was detected by disk diffusion method with clindamycin (2 μg) and erythromycin (15 μg) disks positioned 15–26 mm apart [47 ]. MIC for vancomycin was determined by E-tests, in line with the manufacturer’s instructions (AB Biodisc, Solna, Sweden).
Resistance to methicillin was first identified using cefoxitin (30 µg) and oxacillin (1 µg) disks, and then confirmed by the detection of PBP2a protein (OXOID ™ PBP2 ’Latex Agglutination Test Kit, Basingstoke, UK).
Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as a resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fungal and Bacterial Culture Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the mycology department, direct examination of each sample was performed by Calcofluor-White, May–Grunwald–Giemsa and Gomori–Grocott staining. Culture was performed on 2 Sabouraud media supplemented with gentamicin and chloramphenicol (Biorad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) incubated at 25 and 37 °C, respectively, for three weeks, one ChromAgar media (Becton Dickinson, Grenoble, France) incubated at 37 °C for 10 days and one Brain–Heart Infusion (BHI) broth incubated at 30 °C for 3 weeks. Concurrently, extra material available was stored at −80 °C before further molecular studies. When concomitantly sent to the bacteriology department (n = 21), cultures were performed on Columbia Blood agar with and without colistin and nalidixic acid, Chocolate agar PolyViteX, Drigalsky agar and Schaedler broth (bioMérieux, Lyon, France) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and in presence of 5% CO2. Agar plates and Schaedler broth were incubated at 35 °C for 48 h and 14 days, respectively. Bacterial culture was missing for 24 samples because the samples had only been sent to the mycology department.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Plaque Formation Assay for L. monocytogenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ability of L. monocytogenes Scott A to form lysis plaques on cell lines HT29 and HT29-MTX was assessed using the PFA as previously described by Roche et al. (2001 (link)). Briefly, cell monolayers were grown until they reached 90% confluence in DMEM supplemented with antibiotics and then without antibiotics for another 24 h. The overnight L. monocytogenes cultures, grown in BHI broth, were appropriately diluted in DMEM without antibiotics. The 96-wells were inoculated with 2 to 8 log CFU L. monocytogenes per well in triplicate and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in a humidified incubator and treated with 100 μg ml−1 gentamicin (Sigma, France). After 1.5 h of incubation, cell monolayers were overlaid with an agarose gel containing 0.48% indubiose (Bio-Rad Laboratories, France) in DMEM supplemented with 10 μg ml−1 of gentamicin. The number of plaques was counted with a microscope after 48 h of incubation at 37°C in a humidified incubator. Each experiment was repeated three times from independent cultures for each strain and the results were expressed as the number of plaques obtained for 7 or 8 log L. monocytogenes loaded per well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of the all isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Becton–Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The disk diffusion assay was run with 15 antibiotics: bacitracin (10 U), enrofloxacin (5 μg) (OXOID), streptomycin (10 μg), spiramycin (100 μg), sulfadiazine (25 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg) (BD), doxycycline (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), neomycin (30 μg), penicillin (10 U), tetracycline (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25 μg/23.75 μg, respectively), and vancomycin (30 µg and 5 µg) (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA). S. aureus strain ATCC 25923 and Enterococcus faecalis strain ATCC 29212 were used as controls in the susceptibility test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility to 13 antibiotics was determined by the disc diffusion method and using the ADAGIO™ Automated System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) as described. The antibiotics tested included ampicillin (10 µg), penicillin (6 µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (20 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), vancomycin (5 µg), teicoplanin (30 µg), streptomycin (300 µg), gentamicin (120 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), quinupristin-dalfopristin (15 µg), linezolid (30 µg) and tigecycline (15 µg) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA)]. Susceptibility to aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, quinolones and β-lactam antibiotics was also determined by an E-test (M.I.C. Evaluator™, OXOID, Basingstoke, UK). The methods and the interpretation of the results followed the CLSI guidelines [32 ]. Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were used as control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation of E. coli was performed as follows: liquid aspirates were diluted approximately ×106 fold with sterile PBS (phosphate saline buffer). Approximately 0.05 ml volume of feces were placed into 0.5 ml of sterile PBS, vortexed to homogeneity, an aliquot was diluted approximately ×106 fold. Biopsy samples were vortexed in 0.2 ml of sterile PBS. For all samples, 0.1 ml of the resulting liquid was spread onto the Luria-Bertani agar plates. After overnight incubation on 37 °C, isolated colonies were identified with the Matrix Assisted Laser Desorbtion/Ionization (MALDI) Biotyper software (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) using the Microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). For DNA extraction, all E. coli strains were grown in the Luria-Bertani broth at 37 °C with shaking (200 RPM) overnight and collected by centrifugation. Samples and corresponding E. coli isolates are listed in Table 1.
The testing of susceptibility to ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (all from Bio-Rad, USA) was performed by the disc-diffusion method using the Mueller-Hinton agar plates. The E. coli strain ATCC 25922 was used as a control. Current CLSI and EUCAST criteria were used for interpretation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Antibiotic Resistance in CTX-R E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibilities of CTX-R E. coli and their transconjugants were determined by disk diffusion method according to CLSI protocols (19 ). The following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin (10 μg), amoxicillin (20 μg) plus clavulanic acid (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim (5 μg), and sulfonamides (300 μg) (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France if available or Oxoid, Dardilly, France). The susceptibility breakpoints for all antimicrobials were those recommended by CLSI (20 ).
ESBL production was detected by double-disk synergy test on Mueller-Hinton agar between clavulanic acid and ceftazidime, cefotaxime, or cefepime (20 , 21 (link)). AmpC beta-lactamases detection was based on the inhibitory effect of cloxacillin on AmpC production observed on plates supplemented with 200 mg/L cloxacillin. The control strains used were E. coli ATCC 25922, K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, and K. pneumoniae CMY-2 from Pr R. Bonnet, France.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Antibiotic Susceptibility with EUCAST Standards

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was determined on Müller–Hinton agar by standard disc diffusion method as recommended by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST; www.eucast.org). Seventeen antibiotics were tested, including ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, aztreonam, amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem and colistin (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The MIC for imipenem was determined using the Etest method (bioMérieux, La Balmes les Grottes, France) and the result was interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae (susceptible if MIC ≤ 2 mg/L)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on all isolates recovered from the two selective media using the disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar plates (Neogen, Lansing, Michigan) for ticarcillin (75 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20–10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (10 μg), temocillin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftazidime/avibactam (10–4 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (1.25–23.75 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (15 μg), and tobramycin (10 μg) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Algés, Portugal), following EUCAST recommendations and breakpoint tables. Susceptibility to fosfomycin was evaluated by the disk diffusion method (50 μg) on MH agar plates supplemented with 25 μg/mL glucose-6-phosphate, according to EUCAST guidelines [24 ]. Strain E. coli ATCC 25922 was used for quality control. Multidrug resistance was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was performed by the disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France) according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie) [9 ]. The following antibiotic discs (drug concentration in μg) were tested: amoxicillin (25 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (15 μg) and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), all from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France).
ESBL phenotypes were detected by double-disk synergy according to the method described by Jarlier et al. [10 (link)]. Disks of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone were placed 20 mm from an amoxicillin/clavulanate disk. Enhancement of the inhibition zone of the third-generation cephalosporin toward the amoxicillin/clavulanate disk indicated the possible presence of an ESBL. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!