The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using bioanalyzer 2100 nano chip

1

MicroRNA Expression Profiling via TaqMan Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MicroRNA (miRNA) expression was determined in triplicates using the TaqMan Low Density Array method (DNAVision, Gosselies, Belgium). Fluorescence data (Bioanalyzer 2100 Nano chip; Agilent Technologies) were normalised by means of two endogenous controls (RNU44 and RNU48). Results were expressed as fold change (2−(mean(ΔCT(VAC+VPA))–mean(ΔCT(VAC)), where CT is the cycle threshold). The Benjamini and Hochberg method was used for multiple testing corrections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Fungal Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All qPCR data shown is based on four biological samples each tested using three technical replicates. Cells were grown in liquid VSuTB for specified times at 30 °C with or without Cm. For RNA isolation, mycelium was harvested by vacuum filtration and 100 mg was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Kit from Qiagen following the manufacturer’s instructions for fungi (Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita, CA, USA). RNA integrity was determined using a BioAnalyzer 2100 nano chip (Agilent Technologies, Mississauga, ON, Canada) following the supplier’s instructions. cDNA was reverse transcribed from RNA (1 μg/reaction) using superscript III (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacture’s directions. qPCR (StepOnePlus, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) used the synthesized cDNA and PowerSYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with 5 ng of cDNA template and a primer concentration of 200 nM in a total sample volume of 10 μL in a 96-well reaction plate. Samples were normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), a glycolysis enzyme [52 (link)], using the ΔΔCT method [53 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Purification and Quality Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was purified using the RNAqueous®-Micro kit (AM1931, Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The manufacturer’s instructions were followed, except that wash steps 2 and 3 were modified to include rolling of the tubes and incubation with the wash buffer for 1 min, and the ethanol added for precipitation was increased to 1.25× lysis buffer volume to include small RNAs. The RNA was eluted in 2 × 10 µl RNAqueous Elution Buffer. In the layer samples for miRNA microarray analysis, four of the tissue samples were extracted using the mirVana kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The RNA was eluted in 2 × 50 µl mirVana Elution Buffer. We used the Norgen Total RNA purification kit (Norgen Biotek, Canada) to purify RNA from whole medial entorhinal tissue.
RNA yield was determined using the NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer or the Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and the quality was assessed with the Agilent BioAnalyzer 2100 Nano chip. Only samples with a RIN value of 8.5 or above were included for further analysis. Isolated RNA samples were stored at −80 °C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying P. aeruginosa in Wound Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scabs from wounds infected with PAO1 from two mice were surgically excised at 28 d and the duplicate specimens were processed independently. Each scab was collected and stored in 1 ml of RNALater (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) at −20°C. Two separate 72 hour colony biofilms, prepared as those used for wound inoculation, were collected in the same manner. RNA was extracted using an Aurum Total RNA Fatty and Fibrous Tissue Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). RNA quality was verified on a Bioanalyzer 2100 Nanochip (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Total RNA was quantified on the Nanodrop 1000 (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). P. aeruginosa specific rRNA from the total RNA was analyzed by RT-qPCR of the 16S rRNA. Primer sequences and concentrations for P. aeruginosa 16S rRNA were described previously (19 (link)). RT-qPCR was performed using the one-step QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and the Rotorgene 6000 instrument (Corbett Research, San Francisco, CA). RNA extracted from a colony biofilm was used to construct a standard curve over five orders of magnitude. Controls lacking reverse transcriptase indicated that the RNA was free from interfering levels of DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Analysis of Transgenic Zebrafish Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 6 pools of approximately 30 livers dissected from 7 dpf Tg(fapb10a:foxn3,EGFP)z106 and non-transgenic siblings using a DirectZol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research). Isolated RNA was run on a Bioanalyzer 2100 Nano Chip (Agilent) to confirm RNA quantity and quality. Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Sample Prep Kit was used to prepare the library. Samples were barcoded as Transgenic versus wild-type and single-end 50-bp reads were generated on a Hiseq 2000 machine. Analysis was performed as described previously (Hill et al., 2013 (link)). Reads were aligned to the genome using NovoAlign version 3.02.07 and a custom index created using the Zv9 genome build, including unassigned scaffolds, and annotated splice junctions generated by the MakeTranscriptome command in the USeq package (version 8.7.0). Splice junction reads were then converted to genomic coordinates using the SamTranscriptomeParser command in USeq and assigned to genes using the Rsubread package for the R programming language (Liao et al., 2013 (link)) and the Ensembl RNA annotation. Differential gene expression analysis was performed on the resulting count table using DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!