The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Merlin scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Merlin scanning electron microscope is a high-performance imaging tool designed for a wide range of applications. It features a high-resolution electron beam, advanced imaging capabilities, and a user-friendly interface. The Merlin's core function is to provide detailed and precise imaging of samples at the nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using merlin scanning electron microscope

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were grown at 37°C with a constant agitation at 200 rpm overnight. 1 ml of cell suspension was placed into a sterile 1.5 ml tube and centrifuged for 15 min at 4,000 rpm at 15°C. Pelleted cells were washed in PBS twice. After centrifugation, collected cells were resuspended in 1% glutaraldehyde/PBS, pH 7.4, and incubated overnight at 22°C. Then cells were rinsed three times with PBS and dehydrated in ethanol at the concentrations of 30%, 40%, 50%, 70%, 80%, and 90% (for 15 min each). Next, cells were suspended in 96% ethanol and centrifuged for 20 min at 5,000 rpm. The procedure was repeated three times. The resulting cell suspension was spread over the glass coverslip surface and dried. After the drying, glass coverslips were coated with gold palladium (Quorum Q150T ES vacuum coater, UK) and imaged using MERLIN scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) in a high vacuum mode at 15 kV. Scanning electron micrographs of planktonic cells were taken at 10,000x magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extracellular Matrix Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ECM samples were washed three times with PBS and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 minutes. The samples were then dehydrated twice in gradient concentrations of ethanol (from 30% to 100%) for 10 minutes, followed by replacement of ethanol with tertiary butanol (from 50% to 100%), and finally, lyophilized using a vacuum drier. After samples were coated with gold using a JEOL JFC-110E Ion Sputter, they were observed under a Zeiss MERLIN scanning electron microscope (Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fibrin Clot Ultrastructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibrin clots, formed by adding CaCl2 (24 mM final concentration) without thrombin to platelet-free plasma, were allowed to form for 2 h at room temperature in a humid chamber. The clots were washed in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), then fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in the same buffer, dehydrated in ethanol, dried with HMDS, and sputter-coated with gold/palladium. The samples were imaged with a Merlin scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Fiber thickness was measured using ImageJ (remeasurement of the original data sets) at randomly selected areas for 100 fibers per clot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microstructural Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with a ZEISS MERLIN scanning electron microscope. Microstructural investigations were performed with a JEOL JEM-2100 and Tecnai G2 Spirit TWIN. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a Rigaku Ultima IV. The valence states of elements were measured with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5000 VersaProbe). All of the spectra were normalized to the C 1 s binding energy at 284.8 eV. Ni/M atomic ratios were measured with a VISTA-MPX ICP-OES. BET measurements were performed on a Quadrasorb SI analyzer at 77 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging Gold Nanoparticles via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunogold labeled preparations were analyzed using Zeiss Merlin scanning electron microscope in a low voltage regime. Acceleration voltage of 0.4 kV was used for the imaging of gold nanoparticles; other parameters were the same as for the surface topography analysis. In the case of 0.4 kV acceleration voltage, the voltage signal of secondary electrons contains more SE2 electrons excited by back-scatter compared to the of secondary electron voltage signal with the 0.2 kV acceleration voltage43 . These SE2 electrons produce material contrast used to distinguish gold nanoparticles when using detector of secondary electrons (In-lens SE) for viewing and imaging sample topography. In-column detection of back-scattered electrons (EsB) was used to validate presence of colloidal gold particles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Membrane Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Merlin scanning electron microscope (Carl ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) was used for imaging of membrane samples at voltages between 3 kV up to 50 kV. The samples were sputter coated with 2.0 nm of a platinum layer to avoid charging. Cross-sections were prepared by dipping the membranes into iso-propanol, freezing in liquid nitrogen and subsequent cracking. The average pore size distribution and the average porosity were determined by analysing SEM-images using the software IMS (Imagic Bildverarbeitung AG, Glattbrugg, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

3D Reconstruction of Neuroblast Chains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Observation with SBF-SEM and analyses of acquired data were performed as described previously with slight modifications (53 (link), 54 (link)). SBF-SEM of the neuroblast chains was performed using a Merlin scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a 3View in-chamber ultramicrotome system (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Sequential images were processed using FIJI. Segmentation of the cell membrane was performed using Microscopy Image Browser (55 (link)). 3D reconstruction was performed using Amira software (Visualization Sciences Group). For details, see the Supplementary Materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scanning Electron Microscope Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were imaged under vacuum in a Zeiss Merlin scanning electron microscope (SEM) with an accelerating potential of 0.8 kV and a current of 15 pA. Working distance was 4.1 mm and magnification was 15,000x.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chitosan-coated Polypropylene Fabric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron
microscopy allowed fiber morphology observation using a MERLIN scanning
electron microscope (from Carl Zeiss Company) equipped with an InLens
detector at low accelerating voltage (2 kV). Prior to analysis, samples
were sputter-coated with a 3.5 nm layer of the Pt/Pd alloy in a Cressington
208 HR sputter coater. SEM combined with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)
microanalysis systems (SDD X-Max), supplied by Oxford Instruments
Company, was used to demonstrate the presence of nitrogen from chitosan
coating onto the PP fabric.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Disassembled SSB Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging and mapping data were collected on a MERLIN scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss) at an acceleration voltage of 30 kV and probe current of 20 nA. The SSB cells were disassembled in an Ar-filled glovebox and the pellets mounted onto a sample holder using conductive Cu tape to reduce the carbon signal for energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping. Sample transfer under inert conditions to the microscope was done using a customized holder.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!