The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aquillion one

Manufactured by Toshiba
Sourced in Japan

The Aquillion ONE is a computed tomography (CT) imaging system manufactured by Toshiba. It is designed to capture high-quality, three-dimensional images of the body's internal structures. The system uses advanced X-ray technology to generate detailed scans, allowing medical professionals to diagnose and monitor a wide range of health conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using aquillion one

1

Coronary Artery Disease Assessment Using CCTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CCTA scans were performed using a 320 slice volume CT scanner (Aquillion One, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) with prospective electrocardiographic (ECG) gating. The images were analysed on a dedicated workstation (Vitrea Advanced Workstation, Vital Images, USA) by an experienced cardiologist. Luminal diameter stenosis was evaluated in each segment using the 18segment Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) model [13] (link). Coronary lesions were quantified for stenosis by visual assessment; and severity was classified as no stenosis: 0% diameter reduction; mild stenosis: 1% to 29% diameter reduction; moderate stenosis: 30% to 49% diameter reduction; and severe stenosis: 50% to 100% diameter reduction. Severe stenosis and nonevaluable segments with a diameter exceeding 2 mm were defined as obstructive CAD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

64-MDCT Lung Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent 64-MDCT scanning (Aquillion ONE; Toshiba Medical, Tokyo, Japan) while at full inspiration. No contrast medium was used. MDCT scan parameters were collimation of 0.5 mm; 120 kV; 200 mA (automatic exposure control system); gantry rotation time of 0.5 seconds; and beam pitch of 0.83. All images were reconstructed using standard reconstruction algorithms with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm and a reconstruction interval of 0.5 mm. The voxel size was 0.63×0.63×0.5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Radiological Assessment of Renal Abnormalities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A dedicated radiological review of pertinent computed tomographic (CT) images (Brilliant-16 detectors-Philips, Best, The Netherlands, and Aquillion One-Toshiba, Japan) and ultrasonography (US) studies (Logic P6 and E9, GE Healthcare-Milwaukee-USA) was performed by two dedicated radiologists. All patients had, at least, an abdomen and pelvis CT sequence without intravenous administration of contrast media at hospital admission. If available, sequences after intravenous contrast media were analyzed together. In some cases, CT examinations were performed after the US, and these images were also assessed. The parameters observed were degree of renal dilation (hydronephrosis), presence or absence of urolithiasis, urothelial enhancement, perirenal inflammatory changes (heterogeneous attenuation, fat strandings, and enhancement), and presence of the bear paw sign.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Imaging Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multislice NCCT, preoperative multiphase CTA-SI, and follow-up NCCT of at least 24 h to assess the final infarct size were performed in our center with (1) A 320-detector Toshiba (Aquillion One Toshiba Medical Systems Co., Tokyo, Japan), (2) A 64-detector Toshiba (Aquillion CX Toshiba Medical Systems Co., Tokyo, Japan), and (3) A 64-detector Philips (IQon Philips Healthcare, USA).
Continuous axial sections parallel to the orbitomeatal line of NCCT were obtained from the base of the skull to vertex. Coverage of CTA varied from skull base to vertex, C7 to vertex, and aortic arch to vertex. The contrast was injected at a flow rate of 4–5 cc/s with a total volume of 70–90 cc. The patients from other hospitals that indicated for endovascular thrombectomy performed multislice NCCT with single-phase CTA before referring to our center.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Coronary CTA for Stenosis Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients in the Dan-NICAD trial underwent coronary CTA scans on a 320-slice volume CT scanner (Aquillion One, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) according to clinical guidelines.
CT imaging analysis included an Agatston calcium score and evaluation of CAD including luminal diameter stenosis estimation in each segment of the coronary tree using an 18-segment model. Coronary lesions were evaluated blinded to patient history. Stenosis severity was classified in all segments with a reference vessel diameter >2 mm. Severe stenosis was defined as 50–100% diameter reduction (70% to 100% area reduction). Segments with suspected severe stenosis and non-evaluable segments with a reference vessel diameter >2 mm were defined as having obstructive CAD by coronary CTA and referred to ICA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Coronary Artery Calcification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were scanned using 320-detector row computed tomography (Aquillion ONE; Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). A nonenhanced prospective electrocardiogram was performed to measure the CAC score with the following parameters: rotation time, 275 ms; slice collimation, 0.5 mm; slice thickness, 3.0 mm; tube voltage, 100 kV; and automatic tube current modulation (SURE Exposure 3D standard; Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan). Images were analyzed in a core workstation by using dedicated software (TeraRecon V. 4.4.11.82.3430.Beta; TeraRecon, Foster City, CA). The CAC score was measured using the Agatston method.[29 (link),30 (link)]The total CAC score was the sum of all individual calcified lesions identified within the area of the coronary arteries. CAC scores >100 U indicated CAC.[22 (link),31 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized CT Scanning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT studies were performed using a 64-detector row CT scanner (LightSpeed VCT or Discovery CT750 HD; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA: number of cases = 6 and 15, respectively) or a 64-, 80-, or 320-detector row CT scanner (Aquillion64, Aquillion Prime, and Aquillion ONE, respectively; Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., Tochigi, Japan: number of cases = 48, 2, and 11, respectively). Although CT was performed with various protocols, the scanning parameters of unenhanced CT were constant, as follows: voltage, 120 kVp; tube current controlled by automatic exposure control technique; matrix, 512 × 512; field of view, 350–450 mm; and slice thickness, 5 mm. Iterative reconstruction methods were not used in the present study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimizing CT Dosage through Phantom Scanning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT scanning was performed on a 320-detector-row CT scanner (Aquillion ONE; Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The protocol consisted of acquisition of a CT volume data covering the entire phantom with eight different tube current values, i.e., 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 250, and 290 mAs for all three phantom models. The detailed CT parameters were as follows: tube energy 120 kVp; collimation 80 × 0.5 mm; rotation time 0.5 seconds; and pitch 0.75. The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and the dose length product (DLP) were recorded for each mAs. An automatic tube current modulation software (SureExposure 3D, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan) was not used as it can produce minor changes in the tube current-time product settings in each scan. Instead, eight fixed-tube, current-time product settings were used as they can deliver exactly the same image noise as predicted. Other benefits of the use of a fixed tube current technique could include better comparability and reproducibility with CT scanners from other manufacturers. The phantom was positioned within the isocenter of the CT scanner with its cross-section perpendicular to the scanner's z-axis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CT Image Acquisition Protocol for TCIA and CCF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CT images for the TCIA cohort were acquired (10 (link)) from one of the following CT scanners: General Electric Discovery ST, General Electric Lightspeed Plus, or Toshiba Medical Systems Aquillion ONE. CT scans were acquired in helical mode with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm (General Electric) or 2 mm (Toshiba), at 120 kVp and 300 mAs tube current. Image resolution was 1 mm for all the scans. The CT images for the CCF cohort were acquired from either The General Electric Medical System or The Siemens Medical System. CT scans were acquired in helical mode with a slice thickness of 3 mm, at 120 kVp and 235 mAs tube current. Image resolution is between 0.4 and 0.5 mm for most of the patients, with an image matrix of 512 × 512.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

64-MDCT Thoracic Inlet to Diaphragm Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were scanned with a 64-MDCT scanner (Aquillion ONE, Toshiba Medical Systems; Tokyo, Japan) from the thoracic inlet to the diaphragm while at full inspiration. None received contrast medium. The scan was carried out with the following settings: 0.5-mm collimation; 120kV; auto-exposure control; gantry rotation time of 0.5 seconds; and beam pitch of 0.83. All images were reconstructed using standard reconstruction algorithms with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm and a reconstruction interval of 0.5 mm. The voxel size was 0.63×0.63×0.5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!