The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Shim pack vp ods

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Shim-pack VP-ODS is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. It features a spherical, porous silica-based stationary phase with octadecylsilane (ODS) bonding, providing effective reversed-phase chromatographic separation. The column is suitable for a variety of applications, including the analysis of pharmaceuticals, environmental samples, and food products.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using shim pack vp ods

1

Assay of Tubulin-Microtubule Binding Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tubulin was prepared from calf brain and assembled and cross-linked into microtubules as previously described [39 (link)]. The microtubule binding assay was conducted as previously described, with slight modifications [40 (link)]. Hispidin and paclitaxel were separately incubated with the cross-linked microtubules in glycerol assembly buffer (3.4 M glycerol, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 1 mM EGTA, 6 mM MgCl2, and pH 6.5) with 0.1 mM GTP for 30 min at 25°C. The samples were then centrifuged at 90,000 × g for 15 min at 25°C using a Beckman Optima TLX ultracentrifuge. The supernatant was collected, and the pellet was resuspended in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Both the pellet and supernatant were extracted three times with an excess volume of dichloromethane, dried under vacuum, and dissolved in methanol. The amount of hispidin or paclitaxel that was bound to the pelleted polymers or present in the supernatant was determined by HPLC using a C-18 column (Shim-pack VP-ODS, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 mm bead size) with 70% methanol in water (v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Lycopene in THPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, a whole package of THPS 200 g was transferred into a beaker. After mixed for 2 minutes at 3000 r/min by a blender, 2.000 g THPS was weighed in a 250 mL flask and wrapped with aluminum foil to prevent exposure to light. The procedure of extraction and HPLC detection was in accordance with previous study [6 (link)]. 50 mL of solvent (50 : 25 : 25 hexane/acetone/ethanol containing 2.5% pyrogallic acid) was added with nitrogen protection. After shaken for 10 min, 10 mL of distilled water was added for a further shaking. The hexane phase was filtered through a 0.2 μm nylon filter. One injection volume of filtrate 10 μL was injected into a liquid chromatography equipped with diode array detector (LC-Prominence-20AT and SPD-M20A, Shimadzu Co., Japan). An analytical column C18 (Shim–pack VP-ODS 15 cm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 µm) was employed and kept at 30°C. An isocratic elution of mobile phase with 50 : 50 methanol/acetonitrile was delivered at a flow rate 1 mL/min. Lycopene was detected at 472 nm, and its calibration curves (R2 = 0.984) had previously been established by the standard lycopene. The limit of detection was 2.6 × 10−6µg/mL, the recovery rate was 92%, and coefficient of variation was 3.44%. The peaks and areas were calculated with LC solution software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrochemical and Chromatographic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All voltammetric analyses were performed using Ivium® CompactStat potentiostat (Ivium, the Netherlands) and Iviumsoft® software, version 2.699. In order to assemble the electrochemical cell, a labmade Ag|AgCl (3 mol·L−1 KCl) was used as reference electrode, a platinum wire (LabSolution®, Brazil) was used as counter electrode, and the graphite/epoxy composite electrode, bare or modified, was used as working electrode.
HPLC measurements were executed on a Shimadzu® equipment (Prominence®, software LC solutions 1.0.0.1, Japan). A C18 column (Shim-pack VP-ODS, 250 × 4.6 mm, Japan) was employed with methanol/water (1 : 1) (0.600 mL/min) as the mobile phase.
All the atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were performed with a FlexAFM instruments (Nanosurf®, Switzerland) and controlled by Nanosurf Easyscan 2 software. The probe used was EZ2-Flex AFM (100 µm) and cantilever model PPP-nclr. The figures were assembled using Gwyddion® software (Czech Republic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare extract for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, the dried HRs (200 mg) were homogenized in 6 mL methanol 80% (HPLC grade), bath-sonicated (25-30ºC for 20 min), and centrifuged (3500 rpm, 15 min) for three times. The supernatant was collected and filtered using 0.22 µm membrane. The HPLC standards of phenolic compounds (purity >98%) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC analysis of nine Manufacturing Company) as described in our previous study (Amani et al., 2020) (link). Analysis of reverse phase liquid chromatographic was done using analytical column of octadecylsilane (Shim-pack VP-ODS 25 cm long × 4.6 mm diameter, particle size 5 μm, Japan). The separation of each compound was performed based on the gradient ratio of acetonitrile to acetic acid (v/v) for 35 min. The obtained data was processed using Chemstation software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Phenobarbital Levels via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC was chosen to detect the concentration of PB. The first step was to configure the standard solution. PB standards were accurately weighed and dissolved in methanol to obtain a 500 μg/mL PB stock solution. A certain volume of the PB stock solution was precisely measured in a volumetric flask and diluted with methanol to obtain a series of standard solutions with different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 10, 20, and 30 μg/mL). Then, 50 μL of ultrapure water and 50 µL of the PB solution from the series were mixed to obtain a series of samples with concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.25, 5, 10, and 15 μg/mL. Then, 300 µL of methanol were added to the sample, and the sample was analyzed after sufficient mixing. The ordinate represents the peak area of PB (A), and the abscissa represents the concentration of PB (ρ, μg/mL). The standard curve was drawn, and the minimum detection limit was calculated. Finally, the sample was processed and tested. Fifty microlitres of ultrapure water, 50 µL of sample and 300 µL of methanol were mixed and injected for determination.
Chromatography conditions: The column type was Shim-pack VP-ODs (4.6 × 150 L, SHIMADZU), and methanol-water (95:5, V/V) was used as the mobile phase. The injection volume was 20 μL, and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Chromatographic information was acquired at a wavelength of 242 nm at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Active Compounds in ALE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ALE was dissolved in 80% methanol and centrifuged for 5 min at 3,000 rpm. The supernatant was used as the analytical sample for the determination. The components of ALE were determined with the Prominence LC-20A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The HPLC system was equipped with a CMA-20A communications bus module, LC 20AD liquid chromatograph, SPD-M20A diode array detector, SIL-20AC autosampler, DGU-20A3 degasser, and CTO-20AC column oven. HPLC analysis was conducted using a Shim-pack VP-ODS (3 × 75 mm, 2.2 μm, Shimadzu, Japan) The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.15 ml/min. The chromatogram was monitored at 330 nm. The injection volume was 10 μL. The column temperature was maintained at 30°C. The mobile phase, consisting of 100% acetonitrile (A) and water containing 0.1% formic acid (B), was run with the gradient programs shown in Table 1. The LC/MS-IT-TOF was run with the gradient programs shown in Table 1. The LC/MS-IT-TOF was operated with a nebulizer gas flow rate of 1.5 ml/min, detector voltage of 1.53 kV, and probe voltage of 450 kV. The mass range (m/z) was 100–1500 amu.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Rhamnolipid Biosurfactants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rhamnolipid samples containing ethyl acetate were evaporated. Phenacyl esters of rhamnolipids were obtained as described before by Schenk et al. (1995) . HPLC analysis was performed in a Shimadzu HPLC instrument coupled with a UV detector system. For calibration mono and di-rhamnolipid standard solutions (0.25; 0.50; 0.75; 1.0 g/L) were used. A reverse phase column (Shim-pack VP-ODS, Shimadzu − 150 mm × 0.46 mm, 5 μm silica gel) was used at 30 °C. The retention time for Rha-Rha-C10C10 was 25.2 ± 0.1 min and for Rha-C10C10 was 26.1± 0.1 min. The protocol for rhamnolipid separation and quantification was done as described by Müller et al. (2010) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Serotonin Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serotonin and 5-HIAA (5 mg) were dissolved in 100 mL of eluting solution (50 ml MilliQ water, 0.43 ml HClO4 70% [0.2 N], 10 mg EDTA, 9.5 mg sodium metabissulfite) and frozen at −20°C, to later be used as a standard.
The HPLC system consisted of a delivery pump (LC20-AT, Shimadzu), a 20 µL sample injector (Rheodyne), a degasser (DGA-20A5), and an analytical column (Shimadzu Shim-Pack VP-ODS, 250×4.6 mm internal diameter). The integrating recorder was a Shimadzu CBM-20A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). An electrochemical detector (Model L-ECD-6A) with glassy carbon was be used at a voltage setting of +0.83 V, with a sensitivity set at 8 nA full deflection. The mobile phase consisted of a solution of 70 mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.9), 0.2 mM EDTA, 5% methanol and 20% sodium metabissulfite as a conservative. The column temperature was set at 17°C, and the isocratic flow rate was 1.8 ml/min. 0.5 mL of extracellular fluid (ECF) were extracted by quickly removing one brain from the skull and incubating it in 2 mL of 50 mM TBS, pH 7.4, containing 90 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM glutathione for 30 min at 4°C (7). This fluid was then mixed with 0.5 mL of eluting solution, filtered through a 0.22 µm syringe filter, and then injected into the HPLC system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Quantification of PTA, BHET, and MHET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PTA, BHET, and MHET released in the fermented broth were obtained using liquid–liquid extraction (adapted from Kim and Lee [44 (link)]) (Figure 3). The chromatographic separations were performed on a Shimadzu equipped with an octadecylsilane (C18) column Shim-pack VP-ODS (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm) coupled to a pre-column of the same material (Shimadzu, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a manual injector and using the following mobile phases: Solvent A: 0.5% (v/v) formic acid:acetonitrile, HPLC grade 90:10, and Solvent B: 0.5% (v/v) formic acid:acetonitrile, HPLC grade 60:40. These mobile phases were followed by an elution gradient, according to Table S1 (supplementary material), in a flow of 0.5 mL·min−1. The analytes were detected at a wavelength of 254 nm. Benzoic acid (retention time = 23.4 min) was used as an internal standard. The method was the following: linearity from 0.15 ppm to 300.0 ppm for PTA, BHET, and MHET, with a correlation coefficient of 0.999 for the three analytes (6 calibration solutions n = 3); precision determined by the relative standard deviation (variation coefficient) between 1.1% and 31.1%. The latter was the lowest concentration of the curve. The chromatogram in Figure 4 shows the separation efficiency of the methodology used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenolic Profiling of Grape Pomace

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenolic analysis of total grape pomace (skins, seeds and stalks) was performed with a methanol solution with 10 mg mL−1 crude extract that was solubilized with ultrasound, filtered through a 0.45 µm nylon filter and injected into the loop (20 µL) at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1 at ambient temperature [16 (link)]. The polyphenols were separated in a C18 reversed-phase column, Shim-pack VP-ODS (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 µm particle size) with a system controller CBM-20A (Shimadzu Co., Kioto, Japan) connected to binary pumps LC-20AD (Shimadzu®) that had a UV/VIS SPD-20A detector (Shimadzu®), CTO-20A (Shimadzu®) and self-injector SIL 20AC (Shimadzu®). The solvent system used to elute the compounds was: A—0.1% acetic acid water solution, and B—methanol. The following gradient conditions were used: 0–10 min (95% A/5% B); 10–60 min (50% A/50% B); 60–80 min (30% A/70% B); and 80–90 min (95% A/5% B). A chromatographic profile of the extracts was obtained at a wavelength of 254 nm. The identification of the compounds in grape pomace was performed in an AmaZon ETD (Bruker Co., Billerica, MA, USA) instrument with positive ion mode mass spectrometry using 27 psi and a capillary voltage of 4500 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!