The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using clone rpa t8

1

Flow Cytometry Analysis of LAG3 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a subset of patients (n = 63), freshly isolated cells were lysed using the Immunoprep Reagent System (Beckman Coulter) and stained with CD45-FITC/CD56-PE/CD19-ECD/CD3-PC5 and CD45-FITC/CD4-PE/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 antibody mixes (all Tetrachrome, Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany), according to manufacturer´s instructions. Flow-cytometry analysis was carried out and analyzed using NAVIOS cytometer and analysis software (Beckman Coulter).
In a small patient subpopulation, from which pretreatment PBMCs were available (n = 6, patient characteristics in Supplementary Table 1), expression of membrane bound LAG3 was quantified in T lymphocytes, key players of antitumoral response. For this instance, priorly isolated and cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed and stained for flow cytometry analysis using fluorescently labeled mAbs directed towards CD3, CD4, CD8 and LAG3, in order to quantify LAG3 positive Helper T lymphocytes (HTLs) (CD3 + CD4 + CD8-LAG3 + ) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) (CD3 + CD4-CD8 + LAG3 + ) (CD3: Clone UCHT1, Fluorophor APC-R700 ; CD4: Clone SK3, Fluorophor BUV737 ; CD8: Clone RPA-T8, Fluorophor BV786; LAG3: Clone T47-530, Fluorophor Alexa 647; all originating from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). A LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for cytometry analysis and FlowJo 10.6 software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA) for data analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive T-Cell Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells harvested from overnight stimulation cultures were incubated with live/dead aqua V510 for 15 min on ice. The cells were then surface stained for 30 min on ice using anti-CD3-FITC (BioLegend, clone UCHT1, 1:200, Cat# 300406), anti-CD4-APC-H7 (BD Pharmingen™, clone RPA-T4, 1:200, Cat# 560158), and anti-CD8-PerCPCy5.5 (BD Biosciences, clone RPA-T8, 1:200, Cat# 560662) antibodies. After fixation and permeabilization with Cytofix and Perm (BD Biosciences, Cat# 554714) on ice for 15 min, intracellular staining was performed on ice for 30 min using anti-TFNα-PE-Cy7 (BD, clone MAb11, 1:200, Cat # 557647) and anti-IFNγ-APC (BD Pharmingen™, clone B27, 1:200, Cat# 554702) antibodies. After the final wash step, the cells were resuspended in 200 µL of FACS buffer. Samples were acquired using an FACSAria III instrument (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analysed using the FlowJo software (Treestar, San Carlos, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

T Cell PD-1 Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were stained and erythrocytes were lysed by researchers who were blinded to the clinical data. According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, monoclonal antibodies and their isotype controls were used: BV421-labeled anti-PD-1 (5 μl, clone EH12.1; BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA), APC-H7 labeled anti-CD3 (5 μl, clone SK7; BD Bioscience), FITC-labeled anti-CD4 (5 μl, clone OKT4; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), FITC-labeled anti-CD8 (20μl, clone RPA-T8; BD Bioscience) per 100μl of whole blood. Samples were measured on the Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and analyzed by Gallios Software Version 1.0 (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Lymphocytes were gated by forward scatter and side scatter, and T cells subsets were further distinguished by CD3+ and CD4+ staining, or CD3+ and CD8+ staining. At least 3,000 CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells were analyzed from each sample. Results are expressed as percentage of PD-1+CD4+ and PD-1+CD8+ T cells (Fig 1)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a FACS flow cytometer Celesta (BD Biosciences). The antihuman antibodies, including CD45 (Clone HI30, BioLegend, Cat# 982316), CD3 (Clone OKT3, BioLegend, Cat#317318), CD4 (Clone OKT4, BD Biosciences, Cat#566804), CD8 (Clone RPA-T8, BD Biosciences, Cat#565165), and IL1R2 (Clone MNC2, BD Biosciences, Cat#552401), and the antimouse antibodies including CD45 (Clone 30-F11, BioLegend, Cat#103134), CD3 (Clone 17A2, BioLegend, Cat#100204), TCRβ (Clone H57-597, BioLegend, Cat#109205), CD4 (Clone GK1.5, BioLegend, Cat#100414), CD8 (Clone 53–6.7, BD Biosciences, Cat#563068), FoxP3 (Clone MF-14, BioLegend, Cat#126419), PD-1 (Clone 29F.1A12, BioLegend, Cat#135224), CD366 (Clone 5D12, BD Biosciences, Cat#566346), CD121a (Clone 35F5, BD Biosciences, Cat#563629), CD121b (Clone 4E2, BD Biosciences, Cat#554450), CD31 (Clone MEC13.3, BioLegend, Cat#102507), CD140b (Clone APB5, BioLegend, Cat#136008), and I-A/I-E (M5/114.15.2, BioLegend, Cat#107614) were used in the present multicolor staining. The intracellular transcription factors and cytokines staining, cells were stimulated with leukocyte activation cocktail (Catalog: 423304, BioLegend) for 6 hours and then followed the standard staining protocol described in our previous report.38 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Placental CD8+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining was performed on placenta tissues using mouse anti-human CD8 (1:100 dilution, Clone RPA-T8, BD#557084, BD Biosciences, San Jose, California) antibody or mouse IgG (Abcam#98952, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) isotype controls per previously described protocol.75 (link) Briefly, slides were prepared from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded specimens of placental tissue. Dewaxing protocol was performed and 10% normal goat serum was used for blocking. Staining was performed using BOND automated IHC Stainer (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Immunohistochemical cell staining was quantified using computer-assisted morpholology (Image Pro, Miami, Florida). The total number of CD8 positive cells was determined from representative 5 high-powered fields on each specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An aliquot of the T cell-enriched samples from each donor was stained with anti-human CD3 (cat No. 300426, clone UCHT1, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 minutes at room temperature to validate the isolation of T cells. The aliquots were also stained with anti-human CD3 (cat No. 300426, clone UCHT1, BioLegend), anti-human CD8 (cat No. 560662, clone RPA-T8, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and anti-human CD45RO (cat No. 562299, clone UCHL1, BD Biosciences). The cells were then treated with fixation/permeabilization concentrate (cat No. 00-5123-43, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) to fix and permeabilize cells for 1 h at 4°C, and intracellular staining was conducted according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The cells were stained with anti-human interferon γ (IFN-γ) (cat No. 56-7319-41, clone 4S.B3, Invitrogen), anti-human tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (cat No. 25-7349-41, clone MAb11, Invitrogen), and anti-human IL-2 (cat No. 500307, clone MQ1-17H12, BioLegend). Sample data were acquired using the LSR Fortessa X20 and were analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

T cell phenotyping and analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T cells were phenotyped with antibodies against surface markers CD4 (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA, Clone L200), CD8 (BD PharMingen, Clone RPA-T8), CD195 (BD PharMingen, Clone 3A9), CD62L (BD Biosciences, Clone SK11), and CD45RA (BD Biosciences, Clone UCHL-1) according to manufacturers’ recommendations. Live/dead discrimination was performed using propidium iodide staining. Stained cells were processed on a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenotypic Analysis of DC and CIK Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DC and CIK cells cultured on day 1 and day 7 were collected. After washing with PBS and centrifugation, the DC cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD14 (Clone M5E2, Cat. No. 561712, BD Pharmingen, US), CD83 (Clone HB15e, Cat. No. 560929, BD Pharmingen, US) and CD86 (Clone 2331 (FUN-1), Cat. No. 560958, BD Pharmingen, US) monoclonal antibodies and PE-labeled mouse anti-human HLA-DR monoclonal antibody (Clone G46–6, Cat. No. 560943, BD Pharmingen, US) for 20 min at room temperature. The CIK cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD3 (Clone HIT3a, Cat. No. 561802, BD Pharmingen, US) and CD4 (Clone RPA-T4, Cat. No. 561005, BD Pharmingen, US) monoclonal antibodies and PE-labeled mouse anti-human CD8 (Clone RPA-T8, Cat. No. 561949 BD Pharmingen, US) and CD56 (Clone B159, Cat. No. 561903, BD Pharmingen, US) monoclonal antibodies for 20 min at room temperature. Then the DC and CIK cells were washed with PBS twice. Flow cytometry was used to determine the phenotypes of DC and CIK cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenotyping of PD-1+ CD8+ T cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient PBMCs were isolated by apheresis as described previously (23 (link)). Briefly, 1 × 105 PBMCs were collected and stained with antibodies against PD-1 (clone EH12.1 BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD8 (clone RPA-T8, BD Biosciences), CD3 (clone UCHT1, BD Biosciences) or their isotype antibodies, and then analyzed on a Becton Dickinson FACSCanto. The percpCy5.5-labeled CD3+ T cells were identified after prior gating from single and living cell according to size and granularity; then these CD3+ T cells were analyzed by dot-plot with CD8 and PD-1. The cells of PE-Cy7high CD8+ and/or FITChigh PD-1+ were gated less than 1% as isotype control staining. The same gating strategy was applied in another PBMC samples to identify the populations of CD8 and PD-1 expressing T cells. All of the results were analyzed using FACSDiva software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive T-cell Suppression Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the suppression assay, the following antibodies were used: CD3 (Pacific Blue, clone UCHT1, BioLegend), CD8 (PE, clone RPA-T8,BDPharmingen) and CD69 (APC, clone FN50, BioLegend). The percent infection was assessed by quantifying GFP expression using the following formula:
[1(%GFP+CD4+TcellsculturedwithCD8+Tcells)/(%GFP+CD4+Tcellswithouteffectors)x100%].
The following markers were used to assess cell death, immune activation, and exhaustion: CD3 (PE, clone UCHT1, BD Pharmingen), CD8 (APC-H7, clone SK1, BD Biosciences), CD69 (APC, clone FN50, BioLegend), 7AAD (Read in PerCP/Cy5.5, BD Pharmingen), Annexin V (Read in V450, BD Biosciences) and PD1 (PerCP/Cy5.5, clone EH12.2H7, BioLegend)CD25 (FITC, clone M-A251, BD Pharmingen), HLA-DR (PE, clone L243, Biolegend) and Ki67 (APC, clone Ki67, Biolegend). Proliferation was assessed using the CellTrace cell proliferation kit from Invitrogen, and read in the FITC channel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!