The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using cd235a pe cy7

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface marker expression analysis was conducted by flow cytometry using either a FACSCalibur (for 3-color panels, Becton Dickinson, East Rutherford, NJ) or a BD FACSCanto flow cytometer (for 6-color panels) after fluorescent antibody labeling. All antibodies were provided by BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA) as follows: CD31-APC Cy7 (clone WM59), CD31-FITC (WM59), CD34-PErCP Cy5.5 (clone 8G12), CD34-PE (clone 563), CD34-FITC (clone 581), CD38-APC (Clone HIT2), CD43-APC (clone 1G10), CD45-APC (Clone HI30), CD45-APC Cy7 (Clone 2D1), CD45RA-APC H7 (Clone HI100), CD49f-PE (Clone GoH3), CD73-APC (clone M-A712), CD90-PE Cy7 (Clone 5E10), CD144-FITC (Clone 55-7H1), CD235a-PE Cy7 (clone GA-R2), CD235a-PE (clone GA-R2), and DLL4-PE (Clone MHD4-46). Sorting experiments were performed using a BD FACSAria II instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synovial Cell Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synovium was digested in a solution of 3 mg/mL collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich Japan, Tokyo, Japan) at 37 °C. After 3 h, the digested cells were filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Kremsmunster, Austria). The cells from six donors were harvested using a cell-dissociation buffer. Cells were suspended in HBSS at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL and stained for 30 min on ice with the antibodies. For cell isolation, cells were stained with CD31-PE-Cy7 (BD), CD45-PE-Cy7 (BD), CD235a-PE-Cy7 (BD), CD55-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec), CD90-PE (BD) and CD271-APC (Miltenyi Biotec) were used at day 0. Flow cytometric isolation of cell surface antigens were performed by a double-laser Aria 2 system (BD). For cell surface analysis, cells were stained with CD31-FITC (BD), CD45-FITC (BD), CD44-APC-H7 (BD), CD73-BV421 (BD), CD90-PE (BD), CD105-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD), CD55-PE (BD), CD271-APC (Miltenyi Biotec), CD140b-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD) and CD146-FITC (BD) at passage 3. Flow cytometric analysis of cell surface antigens was performed by a triple-laser FACS Verse system (BD). These data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). Flow cytometric analyses were also performed for expanded cells at passage 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Erythroid Differentiation of CD34+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A three-step protocol35 (link) was adapted to generate mature RBCs from mock- and LV-transduced CD34+ cells. From days 0 to 6, cells were grown in a basal erythroid medium supplemented with the following recombinant human cytokines: 100 ng/mL SCF (Peprotech, London, UK), 5 ng/mL IL3 (Peprotech, London, UK), and 3 IU/mL of erythropoietin (EPO) Eprex (Janssen-Cilag, Issy-Les-Moulineaux, France) and hydrocortisone (Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) at 10−6 M. From days 6 to 9, cells were cultured onto a layer of murine stromal MS-5 cells in basal erythroid medium supplemented only with 3 IU/mL EPO Eprex. Finally, from days 9 to 20, cells were continued to be cultured on a layer of MS-5 cells in basal erythroid medium but without cytokines. Erythroid differentiation was monitored by May Grunwald-Giemsa staining, flow cytometry analysis of the erythroid surface markers CD36 (CD36-V450, BD Horizon, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CD71 (CD71-FITC, BD PharMingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and glyophorin A (GYPA) (CD235a-PECY7, BD PharMingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). We used the nuclear dye DRAQ5 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) to evaluate the proportion of enucleated RBCs. Flow cytometry analyses were performed using the Gallios analyzer and Kaluza software (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!