The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Giemsa s stain

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, India

Giemsa's stain is a laboratory reagent used in microscopy for the differential staining of cellular components. It is a mixture of methylene blue, eosin, and azure dyes that selectively binds to nucleic acids, allowing for the visualization of cell structures such as nuclei, cytoplasm, and organelles.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using giemsa s stain

1

Clonogenic Assay for Sensitization to Doxorubicin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clonogenic assay was used to confirm the effectiveness of hTERT downregulation on the sensitization of cells to DOX, as previously described [36 (link)]. Briefly, the MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded into 60 mm plates in the concentration of 200 cells per well. After overnight incubation in standard conditions, on 21st-day post-transduction, cells were exposed to 10–500 nM of DOX. After 24 h, the medium was removed, and cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then the fresh medium was added, and cells were maintained for 14 days, with media change every four days. After that time, a 10 min fixation in methanol and staining with 1:20 aliquot of Giemsa’s stain (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h were performed. The wells were washed with distilled water, air-dried, and the colonies were enumerated. The experiment was repeated three times for each cell line [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage Infection Assay for Leishmania

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were plated on 12mm round glass coverslips (Bellco, US) placed in 24 well plates (Corning, UK) at a density of 4 x 105 cells per well in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% HiFCS. The plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 hours. L. major stationary phase promastigotes were counted and dilutions of different concentrations of parasite (2 x 105 to 6 x 107) were pre-prepared in media to give initial parasite: macrophage ratios within the range of 0.5:1–15:; promastigotes were added to the macrophage cultures. The plates were placed in an incubator maintained at 34°C (temperature relevant for CL [14 (link)]) and 5% CO2 for 24 hours. Subsequently, two thirds of the glass coverslips were transferred to the media perfusion system and maintained under flow conditions at a flow speed of 360 μl/min for 72 hours in a 34°C, 5% CO2 incubator. The remaining coverslips were used for the static control, with macrophages maintained in the same culture medium without flow. The cells were methanol (Sigma, UK) fixed and stained with Giemsa’s stain (Sigma, UK). The infection rate of the macrophages was assessed visually using an oil immersion microscope (100x magnification Zeiss, UK) by counting the number of infected cells per 100 macrophages. Values for percentage infection throughout are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was evaluated using Transwell inserts (6.5 mm diameter) (Corning Costar) in 24 well plates. Pre-treated THP cells (50,000 cells/well) were added to the upper chamber of the insert. The lower chamber contained 1 mL of normal glucose (NG) or high glucose (HG) (20 mM) RPMI/1% human albumin with or without cyclophilin A as chemokine. LPS (10 µg/mL) was used as positive control throughout the experiments. The plates were incubated for 4–24 h and stained with Giemsa’s stain (Merck Chemicals). The number of cells appearing on the lower face of the filter was recorded in three random fields for each well. The chemotactic index (CI) was calculated as the number of cells migrating towards the test sample divided by the number of cells migrating towards the control medium using light microscopy. The number of cells migrating to the bottom chamber was counted by flow cytometry. The inserts were fixed with 4% para-formaldehyde (PFA) and stained with Giemsa’s stain. The cells migrating to the reverse surface of the membrane were counted by light microscopy at 20× magnification in four different random fields. After migration the cells in lower chamber were counted and analyzed directly by flow cytometry (Becton–Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Erythroid Cell Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyse cell morphology on days 7, 10, 13 and 20, 2 × 105 erythroid cells or filtered reticulocytes were cytospun onto glass slides using a Shandon Cytospin 4 Cytocentrifuge with cytofunnels and cytoclips (Thermo Scientific), air dried for 1 min and fixed in methanol for 15 min. The slides were then stained with May‐Grünwald's stain (Merck, diluted 1/2 in Sorensen buffered water) for 5 min, with Giemsa's stain (Merck, diluted 1/10 in Sorensen buffered water) for 10 min and left in Sorensen buffered water for 3 min. Air dried cytospins were imaged using a 40× lens on an Olympus CX43 microscope coupled to an Olympus SC50 camera and the cellSens Entry software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Morphology Observation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell morphology was observed on each sample 7 days after the culturing. The samples were immobilized in 99.8% methanol (Kanto Chemical Co., INC., Tokyo, Japan for 10 min, after airdried, immersed for 30 min in Giemsa’s stain (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Moreover, it was diluted to 20% with distilled water, after washed with running water, airdried. An inverted metallurgical microscope (PME3, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the cells on the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Giemsa Staining for Blood Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin peripheral blood smears were fixed in methanol, then stained with diluted (1:10) Giemsa's stain (Merck Life Science, Mumbai) for 45 min. The blood smears were washed with water and air dried. The stained blood smears were examined under the oil immersion objective (100× ) of the light microscope (Leica DM1000 LED, Germany) for the presence of parasites. A minimum of 150 fields were examined thoroughly before declaring a sample as negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Reagent Procurement for ELISA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the reagents used in the study were of analytical grade and were commercially available in India. ELISA kits were obtained from Ray Biotech (Kolkata, India). Phosphate buffer saline and antibiotic cocktail were procured from HI Media (Kolkata, India). Disposal syringes and glass slides were obtained from Dispo Van (Kolkata, India) and Riviera (Kolkata, India), respectively. Giemsa’s stain, methyl alcohol and chloroforms were purchased from Merck (Kolkata, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscopic Detection of Blood Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin peripheral blood smears were fixed in methanol and stained using 1:10 dilution (stain:water) of Giemsa's stain (Merck Life Science, Mumbai) for 45 min. Stained blood smears were examined microscopically for the presence of parasites under the oil immersion (100× magnification) objective of the light microscope (Leica, Germany). The presence of a single piroplasm was considered as a positive case, and a minimum of 5000 red blood cells (RBCs) was screened before proclaiming the sample negative for any blood parasites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!