The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fastprep 24 automated homogenizer

Manufactured by MP Biomedicals

The FastPrep-24 is an automated homogenizer designed for rapid and efficient sample preparation. It utilizes a linear motion to agitate samples, enabling the disruption and homogenization of various biological materials, such as tissues, cells, and microorganisms.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using fastprep 24 automated homogenizer

1

Spore Formation Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAs from WT/EV, sleC mutant/EV, spo0A mutant/EV, spoVAC*/EV, spoVAC*/spoVAC, dpaAB mutant/EV, and dpaAB mutant/dpaAB strains grown for 18 h on 70:30 sporulation medium containing thiamphenicol (5 μg/ml) were extracted for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses of the spoVAC, spoVAD, spoVAE, dpaA, and dpaB transcripts. The RNA was extracted using a FastRNA Pro Blue kit (MP Biomedical) and a FastPrep-24 automated homogenizer (MP Biomedical). Contaminating genomic DNA was depleted using three successive DNase treatments, and mRNA enrichment was done using an Ambion MicrobExpress bacterial mRNA enrichment kit (Invitrogen), and samples were reverse transcribed as previously described (40 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptional Regulation of Bacillus Sporulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from WT, spo0A, sigF, spoIIQ, sigE, spoIIIA, spoIIIAH, and sigGstrains grown for 17 hrs on 70:30 sporulation media was extracted for qRT-PCR analyses of spoIIIAA transcript. RNA from WT, spo0A, sigF, spoIIQ, sigE, spoIIIA, and sigGstrains grown for 25 hr on 70:30 sporulation media was extracted for qRT-PCR analyses of spoVT, CD1430, and spoVAD transcripts. RNA from WT/EV, spo0A/EV, spoIIIAA/EV, spoIIIA/spoIIIA operon, and spoIIIA/spoIIIAK167A operon complementation strains grown for 17 hr on 70:30 sporulation media was extracted for qRT-PCR analyses of spoIIIAA transcript. RNA was extracted using a FastRNA Pro Blue Kit (MP Biomedical) and a FastPrep-24 automated homogenizer (MP Biomedical). Contaminating genomic DNA was depleted using three successive DNase treatments and mRNA enrichment was done using an Ambion MICROBExpress Bacterial mRNA Enrichment Kit (Invitrogen). Samples were tested for genomic DNA contamination using quantitative PCR for rpoB. Enriched RNA was reverse transcribed using Super Script First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) with random hexamer primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and Sequencing of C. difficile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA for RNA-Seq was extracted from WT, sigE, sigK and spoIIIDC. difficile after 18 hours of growth on 70:30 sporulation media as previously described (Fimlaid et al ., 2013 (link)). Briefly, RNA was extracted using a FastRNA Pro Blue Kit (MP Biomedical) and a FastPrep-24 automated homogenizer (MP Biomedical). Contaminating genomic DNA was depleted using three successive DNase treatments, and samples were tested for genomic DNA contamination using quantitative PCR for 16S rRNA and the sleC gene. DNase-treated RNA (5 µg) was mRNA enriched using a Ribo-Zero Magnetic Kit (Epicentre), and the quality of total RNA was validated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer.
RNA isolated for qRT-PCR was processed identically except that mRNA enrichment was done using an Ambion MICROBExpress Bacterial mRNA Enrichment Kit (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription of enriched RNA was done using the SuperScript® First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) with random hexamer primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tracking SIINFEKL Peptide Trafficking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six to eight week old mice were injected intradermally in each forearm with 30 μl (60 μl total) of 1 mM soluble SIINFEKL (10% TAMRA-labeled) or SLS-T (10% TAMRA-labeled). Mice were split into three end point groups: 4, 24, or 72 h (N = 4, 50% female, 50% male). For each group, mice were fluorescently imaged (IVIS Spectrum CT) under anesthesia, and then sacrificed at the indicated time point. Two additional mice were injected with 30 μl saline in each forearm (60 μl total) and sacrificed at 4 h to serve as controls. After sacrifice, axillary and brachial lymph nodes and spleens were harvested, imaged in IVIS Spectrum CT, and then placed into vials with 1.4 mm acid washed zirconium grinding beads (VWR). Lymph nodes were pooled into the same vial with 200 μl PBS, and spleens were placed in vial with 500 μl PBS. Organs were homogenized for 1 min in a FastPrep-24 Automated Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals) 0.150 μl of homogenate in PBS from each mouse's pooled lymph nodes or spleens were added to a 96-well-plate and analyzed for fluorescence using 557/583 nm excitation and emission reading on a plate reader (BioTek Synergy H4 Microplate Reader).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tissue Distribution Quantification of Fluorescent Tracer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At prescribed times post injection (p.i.), the tumor-draining and non-tumor-draining axillary and brachial lymph nodes, tumor or skin at the injection site, along with the spleen, lungs, liver, and kidneys were harvested and homogenized in D-PBS using 1.4 mm acid washed zirconium grinding beads (OPS Diagnostics LLC, Lebanon, NJ) with a FastPrep-24 Automated Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA). Tissue homogenate fluorescence was measured using a Synergy H4 BioTek plate reader and fluorescent tracer standard curves were made in individual tissue homogenates. Prism 6 (GraphPad, LaJolla, CA) was used to calculate exposure (as area under the curve from 1-72 hr post injection, AUC) from either the measured % injected or concentration of tracer in each tissue as well as the fluorescent tracer half-life of residence within the site of injection using one-phase decay least-squares regression. Error propagation analysis was used to calculate the standard error of AUC measurements. Concentrations are presented as the percent of tracer injection amount per tissue volume calculated from the respective tissue's weight and assuming a density of water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!