The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using axs d8 focus

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Phosphorus Tailings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF, PANalytical B.V. AXIOSmAX, Netherlands) was used to analyze chemical component of phosphorus tailings. X-ray diffraction (XRD, Germany Bruker AXS D8-Focus) was employed to detect the structures of the powder samples. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips CM12, Netherlands Philips Co, Ltd) was performed to study the micromorphology of MH and MH@MOF. Ion chromatograph (IC, American Thermo Fisher ICS-2100) was used to measure the concentration of phosphates in water. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi SU-8010, Japan) was carried out to observe the microscopy of powder samples and char residues of TPU composites after combustion. CCT (Fire Testing Technology, UK) according to ISO 5660 with a heat flux of 35 kW m−2 was adopted to study the flammability of TPU composites which had a thickness of 3 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaporite Mineralogy and Ion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mineralogical composition of the evaporites was measured with a Bruker X-ray diffractometer (AXS D8-Focus, XRD). The freeze-dried samples were ground and scanned in the 2·θ-diffraction angle from 5° to 70°, with a scanning step size of 0.01°, at 40 kV and 40 mA with a Cu X-ray source (Cu Kα1,2, λ = 1.54056 Å).
Anions and low-molecular-weight organic acids were measured by ion chromatography (IC) in the water-extractable phase of the samples. For this analysis, 2 g of sample was sonicated (3 × 1 min cycles) and diluted in 10 mL of deionized water, then filtered through a 22 μm GF/F. The filtrates were collected and loaded into a Metrohm 861 Advanced compact ion chromatograph (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland) undiluted or at dilution values, depending on ion concentrations. For all the anions, the column Metrosep A supp 7−250 was used with 3.6 mM sodium carbonate (NaCO3) as eluent. The pH of the water solutions was measured with a pH meter (WTW, GmbH & Co. KG, Weilheim, Germany) after 24 h of solution stabilization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

XRD and Microscopic Analysis of Crystalline Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystals and components of the CST, PRP, CST-SAP, and CST-PRP-SAP samples were analyzed using an XRD analysis (Bruker, AXS-D8-Focus, Freilassing, Germany) and transmission reflection polarizing microscope (Laica, DM2500P, Wetzlar, Germany). The CuKα ray was used as a radiation source, and the tube pressure and tube flow were 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing LiB-AC Grout Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical bonds of the specimens were determined by AXS D8-Focus from Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany, and FTIR-8000S from Seiko, Tokyo, Japan. The microstructures of LiB-AC grout were investigated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, COXEM EM-30Plus, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). All specimens of microstructure analyzed were crushed into pieces using the stone body after the mechanical test, then stored in alcohol and dried at 60 °C for 24 h before microstructure analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of UCNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transmission electron microscope image was collected using JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope, which characterizes the particle size and morphology of UCNPs. UV-Vis absorption spectrum was tested with UV-2600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy spectra was measured with Bruker ALPHA-T FT-IR spectrometer. The Germany Bruker Axs D8-Focus powder diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) was used to record the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of UCNPs. The fluorescence spectra were characterized on an Edinburgh FLS 980 equipped with external 980 nm diode laser. Cyclic voltammograms were obtained using a three-electrode configuration, connected to electrochemical work station equipped with an electrochemical analyser (CH 660). The auxiliary electrode and working electrode were platinum sheet. In addition, Ag/AgCl was the reference electrode in supporting electrolyte.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Functionalized UiO-66 Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM FEI Nova NanoSEM450) was employed to observe the morphologies of UiO-66-NH2 and UiO-66-NH2-PC. The surface and cross-section morphologies of TFC and TFN membranes were also observed by FE-SEM. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained through a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer to characterize the chemical constitutions of UiO-66-NH2, UiO-66-NH2-PC and the prepared membranes. Water contact angles of TFC and TFN membranes were measured by an optical contact angle measuring system (KRUSS DSA-100). The crystallinities of synthesized UiO-66-NH2 and UiO-66-NH2-PC were confirmed by the X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker AXS D8 Focus). Zeta potential of the prepared membranes was tested by SurPASS electrokinetic analyzer (Anton Paar GmbH), and the roughness was measured by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM, Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Cave Water and Mineral Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH of drip waters was measured in situ with a multiparameter water quality detector (HACH, Loveland, CO, United States). Temperature, humidity, and the concentration of carbon dioxide for cave air from entrance to the innermost were detected in field. pH of solid samples was measured with a UB-7 pH meter (Denver Instrument) in the laboratory. The concentrations of dissolved major anions and cations were analyzed using an ICS-900 ion chromatograph (Thermo Fisher, USA). The mineral phases of weathered rocks and sediments were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker AXS D8-Focus, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mineralogical Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mineralogical composition of the samples was determined by the combination of XRD and Raman spectroscopy. XRD was conducted using a Bruker X-Ray diffractometer (AXS D8-Focus), scanning samples in the 2 ϴ-diffraction angle from 5° to 70°, with a scanning step size of 0.01°, at 40 kV and 40 mA with a Cu X-ray source (Cu Kα1,2, λ = 1.54056 Å). Near Infrared (NIR; from 10,000 to 4,000 cm−1) spectra were collected at 4 cm−1 resolution with a Nicolet iS50FTIR spectrometer using the diffuse reflection (DRIFTS) attachment, a DTGS-KBr detector, and a XT-KBr beamsplitter. Raman spectroscopy was performed with a Horiba JobinYvon Hri550 connected to a Charge Coupled Device (CCD) with 1024 × 256 pixels cooled to 203 K for thermal-noise reduction. Before work, the Raman spectrometer was prepared with four diffraction gratings of 600, 1200, 1800 and 2400 grooves/mm that provide a wide range of intensity signal/resolution ratio. Sample excitation was done by an intensity-modulated (0–200 mW) non-polarized Nd:YAG solid state laser with a wavelength of 532 nm. The spectrometer was connected through fiber optics to a B&W Tek microscope with a 20X objective (Microbeam S. A.), which gives a spot size of 105 µm. When using a 1200 grooves/mm diffraction grating and 198 µm aperture of slit entrance, the resolution is better than 5 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of CDS-PMo12@PVPx NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CDS-PMo12@PVPx(x = 0 ~ 1) NPs were synthesized according to the previously described approach with some modifications [25 (link)]. Detailed procedures are given in the experimental part of the SI. The morphology of the CDS-PMo12@PVPx(x = 0 ~ 1) NPs was observed with transmission electron microscopy (biology TEM, Tecnai G2 spirit Biotwin operated at 120 kV; Talos F200X G2 operated at 200 kV). The crystalline structure was recorded by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Bruker AXS D8 Focus), using Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1.54056 A). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were acquired from a Nicolet 50 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1. The UV–Vis absorption spectra were measured on UV 2600 UV–Vis spectrophotometer. The nanoparticles distribution characteristics and zeta-potential were measured using a particle size analyzer (Malvern, Nano ZS, Japan). Fluorescence measurements were performed on a Jobin Yvon Horiba Fluoromax-3 spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mineral Characterization of Precipitates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mineral phases of the precipitates were detected via X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Bruker AXS D8-Focus, Germany) using Cu-Kα radiation. The peaks of the minerals were detected from 3 to 70° (2𝜃) with a step size of 0.01° and scan speed of 10°/min. The XRD spectra were analyzed using the Jade 6.5 software. The percentages of the minerals in the precipitates were calculated by the Software of Xpowder 12. The mole percentage of Mg2+ in dolomite was calculated based on the empirical equation of Goldsmith et al. (1961) and Zhang et al. (2010) (link). XRD analysis was conducted at the School of Material and Chemical Engineering at the China University of Geoscience (Wuhan).
The morphology and elements of the precipitates were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta 450 FEG, United States) with an X-ray Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS, SDD Inca X-Max 50, Britain). Dried precipitates were adhered onto SEM stubs with double-sided conductive tapes, followed by coating with Pt for image observation. The accelerating voltages of the SEM and EDS were 15 and 20 kV, respectively. SEM analysis was done at the State Key Laboratory of Geobiology and Environmental Geology at the China University of Geoscience (Wuhan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!