The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

53 protocols using prisma mri scanner

1

High-resolution Multiband fMRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI data were collected on a 3.0 Tesla Siemens Prisma MRI Scanner using a 64-channel head coil. For each subject, a multi-slice echo-planar (EPI) sequence was used to acquire functional data: 595 volumes; repetition time (TR) = 720 ms; multiband acceleration factor = 8; matrix size = 104 x 104; field of view (FOV) = 208 × 208 mm; in-plane resolution = 2 × 2 mm; slice thickness = 2 mm, no gap; 72 slices; bandwidth = 2,290 Hz per pixel; echo time (TE) = 37 ms. Visual and auditory stimuli were presented via magnetic resonance compatible goggles and headphones (Optoacoustics LTD, Or Yehuda, Israel). Subjects wore earplugs and headphones to lessen scanner noise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Analytical Characterization of Gadolinium Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained via a Nexus 670 model FTIR spectrophotometer (Thermo Nicolet, USA) at 400-4000 cm-1 at room temperature using KBr pellets. 10 mg samples were heated from room temperature to 800 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C/min in nitrogen. Zeta potential measurements were conducted using a ZetaPALS instrument (Brooken Haven, USA). Nicomp 380 ZLS Zeta potential/Particle sizer (PSS Nicomp, USA) was used for DLS analysis. The concentration of Gd was measured using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES 730-ES, Varian). FEI Magellan 400 microscope was used to obtain the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images. X’Pert PRO MPDPANalytical (Netherlands) X-ray diffractometer with Cu target (40 kV, 40 mA) was used to obtain the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns while JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (Japan) was used to obtain the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. The sample suspension was dropped on a 200 mesh copper grid deposited by carbon, and dried in air. VSM measurements were done by VSM 7400 model (Lakeshore Cryotronics Inc., OH, USA). A 3 T MRI scanner (Siemens Prisma MRI Scanner using head coil) was used for all phantoms, in vitro, and in vivo MR imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Resting-state fMRI acquisition and preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic resonance imaging data was collected on a 3.0 Tesla Siemens Trio MRI Scanner that was upgraded to a 3.0 Tesla Prisma MRI Scanner (Siemens, Munich, Germany) after the acquisition of imaging data from the first 10 subjects. Data were obtained from subjects in one session that occurred on or prior to the day of stool sample collection (mean=1.6d; SD=3.6d). Each imaging session included a resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) sequence (Trio Scanner: repetition time 2.25sec, 161 volumes; Prisma Scanner: repetition time 0.77sec, 425 volumes) and a T1-weighted (MP-RAGE) anatomical scan. Preprocessing of rs-fMRI data was conducted with the AFNI (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni/) and FSL (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/) software packages and included motion correction (AFNI), spatial smoothing (6-mm full-width half-maximum Gaussian kernel; FSL), temporal band-pass filtering (0.005–0.1 Hz; AFNI), linear and quadratic detrending (AFNI), and removal of nuisance signals by regression on six motion parameters (roll, pitch, yaw, and translation in three dimensions) and signal time courses for white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions-of-interest (ROIs) determined on an individual basis using an automated segmentation algorithm (FSL). We did not use global signal regression52 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Brain MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An MRI examination was applied using a 3T Siemens Prisma MRI scanner equipped with a standard 20-channel head coil. The detailed scanning protocol was described in previous studies [29 (link),36 (link)] and comprised the following pulse sequences: a sagittal 3D T1 magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence; a contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted turbo inversion recovery magnitude dark-fluid sequence; a T2-weighted TIRM dark-fluid scan, as well as a fluid attenuation inversion recovery sequence. In addition, RS-fMRI was implemented using echo planar imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal MRI Protocol for Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the present study, an MRI data set previously obtained and published [23 (link)] was used for the analyses. The detailed scanning protocol is therefore described in detail elsewhere [3 (link),10 (link),23 (link)] and comprised the following pulse sequences: a sagittal 3D T1 magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence; a contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) dark-fluid sequence; a T2-weighted TIRM dark-fluid scan; a fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR); as well as an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence, including 300 whole-brain functional volumes. Scanning was applied using a 3T Siemens Prisma MRI scanner equipped with a standard 20-channel head coil. (For a more detailed description please see Supplement S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neuroimaging protocol for structural and diffusion MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to behavioral testing, participants underwent a structural imaging protocol at the University of California, Irvine Facility for Imaging and Brain Research (interval range 8 – 29 days, except for two individuals up to 81 days). Imaging data were acquired using a 3T Siemens Prisma MRI scanner fitted with a 32-channel head coil.
A single high-resolution T1-weighted image (magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence, MP-RAGE) was acquired with the following parameters: echo time (TE) / repetition time (TR) = 2.72 / 2400 ms, field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256 × 192 mm, matrix size = 320 x 320 x 240, voxel size = 0.8 mm3, Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA) acceleration factor = 2, 208 axial slices, and scan time = 6:28.
A single diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo, echo planar imaging image was acquired with the following parameters: TE / TR = 102 / 3500 ms, FOV = 212 × 182 mm2, matrix size = 128 × 110, voxel size = 1.7 mm3, multiband factor = 4, 64 slices with no gap, and scan time = 16:12. Bipolar diffusion-weighting gradients were applied in 64 directions with b values of 1500 s/mm2 and 3000 s/mm2 with 3 b = 0 images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Neuroanatomical Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients’ MRI scans were obtained parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line using 3.0-T MRI scanners. Of the 145 patients, 57 were scanned using an Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands), 35 using a TrioTim scanner (Magnetom Trio, Tim System, Siemens), 36 using a Skyra scanner (Siemens), and 17 using a Prisma MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). All MRI scans were obtained using T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. T1-weighted (T1W) scans were obtained with the following parameters: repetition time, 1900 ms; echo time, 2.6 ms; field-of-view, 220 mm; matrix size, 256 × 256; slice thickness, 1 mm; 176 coronal slices without a gap; voxels, 0.86 × 0.86 × 1 mm3; flip angle, 16°; and number of excitations, 1. The FLAIR scans were obtained with following parameters: repetition time, 9000 ms; field-of-view, 220 mm; matrix size, 384 × 278; slice thickness, 4 mm; and 31 coronal slices without a gap.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Functional Neuroimaging of Bipedal Foot Movements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty healthy controls (12 males and 8 females, average age 26 years old, range 21–37) with no history of neurological injury or disease, or a history of musculoskeletal pathology were recruited from the local community with digital advertisements and word‐of‐mouth advertising. Each participant signed a consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical University of South Carolina. After the opportunity to ask questions, the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory was administered to determine dominant handedness as handedness and foot preference are related in most individuals (Barut, Ozer, SevİNc, Gumus, & Yunten, 2007). In addition, standard MRI safety screening was performed for each participant. Participant's feet were then calibrated to the device and strapped into place across the dorsum (top of the foot) to ensure secure placement. A lower extremity alternating bipedal dorsiflexion/plantarflexion task (described below) was completed within the 3 T Siemens PRISMA MRI scanner. The study consisted of two fMRI visits separated by approximately 2–6 months—which is consistent with longitudinal assessment time points of clinical trials with individuals undergoing gait rehabilitation training.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Brain Imaging in Mental Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects lay horizontally in the MR scanner and their arms rested beside their trunk. To reduce head motion, foam pads were placed around the participants’ head and we explicitly instructed participants to avoid head motion.
For 43 patients and 32 healthy controls, the MRI scans were acquired on a 3 T Prisma MRI scanner (Siemens, Germany). The MRI sequences acquired included the following: one T1-weighted MPRAGE scan (8 min 22 s covering 176 sagittal slices, 1 mm thick, TR = 5000 ms, TE = 2.98 ms, flip angle 1 = 4°, flip angle 2 = 5°, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm), and one rs-fMRI sequence using a multi-band echoplanar 2D (10 min and 11 s covering 600 volumes of 72 slices; 2.5 mm thick, TR = 1000 ms, TE = 37 ms, flip angle = 30°, voxel size = 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm FOV = 230 × 230 mm, GRAPPA = 1, multiband acceleration factor = 8).
For 46 patients and 44 healthy controls, the MRI scans were acquired on a 3 T TrioTim MRI scanner (Siemens, Germany). The MRI sequences acquired included the following: T1-weighted MDEFT scan (13 min 43 s covering 176 sagittal slices, 1 mm thick, TR = 7.92 ms, TE = 2.48 ms, flip angle = 16°, voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm), and one rs-fMRI sequence using a single-band echoplanar 2D (8 min and 40 s covering 256 volumes of 38 slices; TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 90°, voxel size = 3.6 × 3.6 × 3.0 mm, FOV = 230 × 230 mm, GRAPPA = 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiband fMRI Protocol for Cue-Induced Craving

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3-T Siemens AG (Erlangen, Germany) Prisma MRI scanner with a 32-channel head coil at the Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center at UCLA. Multiband echoplanar imaging (EPI) (Xu et al., 2013 (link)) was used to acquire functional T2*-weighted images during performance of the cue-induced craving task [multiband acceleration factor, 8; slice thickness, 2 mm; 72 slices; repetition time (TR), 0.8 s; echo time (TE), 37 ms; flip angle, 52°; field of view (FOV), 208 mm]. For registration purposes, a T2-weighted matched-bandwidth high-resolution anatomical scan (same slice prescription as EPI with TR, 5000 ms; TE, 60 ms) and a T1 magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) high resolution scan [slice thickness, 0.8 mm; 208 slices per slab; TR, 2400 s; TE, 2.24 ms; flip angle, 8°; matrix, 256 × 256; FOV, 256 mm; sagittal orientation] were acquired for each participant. The orientation for matched bandwidth and EPI scans was oblique axial in order to maximize full brain coverage and to optimize signal from ventral prefrontal regions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!