The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using xevo g2 mass spectrometer

1

GLP-1 Construct Deuterium Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of exchange into the indicated GLP-1 constructs, the peptides were dissolved in 25% acetonitrile/water at 50 μM and kept on ice. Deuterium labeling was initiated with an 18-fold dilution into D2O buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate pD 7.01, 100 mM NaCl) at 21°C. After 10 seconds of labeling, the reaction was quenched with the addition of an equal volume of quenching buffer (150 mM sodium phosphate pH 2.48) at 0°C. Samples were then injected onto an in-house packed POROS 20-R2 trap for peptide trapping and desalting for 3 minutes. A Waters nanoACQUITY LC was used to elute each peptide from the trap with a 15%–70% gradient of acetonitrile over 6 minutes at a flow rate of 100 μL/min. Eluant was directed into a Waters Xevo G2 mass spectrometer operated in TOF-only mode for mass analysis. Data were analyzed as described31 (link). All mass spectra were processed manually using MagTran. The relative amount of deuterium in the GLP-1 constructs was determined by subtracting the centroid mass of the undeuterated form from the deuterated form, at each condition. Deuterium levels were not corrected for back exchange and thus reported as relative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-TOFMS Analysis of Urine Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water and acetonitrile were of analytical grade or higher purity. Debrisoquine sulfate and nitrobenzoic acid were obtained from Sigma- Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and utilized as internal standards. Urine samples were processed as previously described (7 ) and analyzed with a BEH C18 Column, 130 Å, 1.7 µM, 2.1 × 50 mm on an Acquity UPLC H-Class (Waters Corporation, MA) coupled to a Xevo G2 mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, UK) (UPLC-TOFMS). The capillary voltage was set at 3.0 kV and the source temperature at 120°C. Injections consisted of 2 µl with a column temperature of 40°C and flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Mobile phase A consisted of water + 0.1% formic acid and Mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid. The gradient was as follows: 0–0.5 min consisted of 95% A; 0.5–4 min from 95% A to 80% A; 4–8 min from 80% A to 5% A; 8–9 min maintain A at 5%; 9–9.1 min from 5% to 95% A; and 9.1– 10.5 min maintain 95% A. The Xevo G2 was operated in both positive and negative electrospray ionization modes with a range of 50–1,200 m/z and mass spectrometry data was acquired in centroid mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Automated Online Pepsin Digestion and HDX-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was analyzed as previously described.(Wales et al., 2008 (link)) Briefly, the samples were digested online using a Poroszyme immobilized pepsin cartridge (2.1 mm x 30 mm, Applied Biosystems) at 15 °C for 30 s, then injected into a custom Waters nanoACQUITY UPLC HDX Manager and analyzed on a XEVO G2 mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., USA). The average amount of back-exchange using this experimental setup was 20–30%, based on analysis of highly deuterated peptide standards. Deuterium levels were not corrected for back-exchange and are therefore reported as relative.(Wales and Engen, 2006 (link)) All experiments were performed in duplicate. The error of measuring the mass of each peptide averaged ± 0.12 Da in this experimental setup (4). The HDX-MS data were processed using PLGS 3.0 and DynamX 3.0 (Waters Corp., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HDX-MS Analysis of IGF2BP1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An HDX MS experiment was performed as described
previously.37 (link) Briefly, deuterium labeling
was initiated with a 20-fold dilution into D2O buffer (50
mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl) of a pre-equilibrated (30
min) aliquot of IGF2BP1 with or without CuB stock solution. After
0.25, 1, 10, 20, 60, and 240 min of labeling, the reaction was quenched
with the addition of quenching buffer (37.5% hydrochloric acid). Samples
were then injected and online-digested using a Waters Enzymate BEH
pepsin column (2.1 × 30 mm, 5 μm). The peptides were trapped
and desalted on a VanGuard Precolumn trap (Acquity UPLC BEH C18, 1.7
μm) for 3 min, eluted from the trap using 15% acetonitrile at
a flow rate of 100 μL/min, and then separated using an Acquity
UPLC BEH C18, 1.7 μm, 1.0 × 100 mm column. All mass spectra
data were acquired using a Waters Xevo G2 mass spectrometer. Peptides
were identified using ProteinLynx Global Server (PLGS) 3.0.2. Relative
deuterium levels of all peptides were calculated by subtracting the
mass of the undeuterated control sample from that of the deuterium-labeled
sample. All mass spectra data were processed using DynamX 3.0. Deuterium
levels were not corrected for back exchange and thus are reported
as relative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Deuterium Labeling for Protein Conformational Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deuterium labeling was initiated with a 20-fold dilution in D2O buffer (100 mM phosphate, pD 7.0) of WT, L369/H373Q mutant, or I136T/L369/H373Q mutant (each 1 mg/mL). After 0.083, 0.25, 1, 10, 30, 60 and 240 min of labeling, the reaction was quenched with the addition of quenching buffer (100 mM phosphate, 4 M GdHCl, 0.5 M TCEP, pH 2.0). Samples were then injected and online digested using a Waters ENZYMATE BEH pepsin column (2.1 × 30 mm, 5 μm). The peptides were trapped and desalted on a VanGuard Pre-Column trap (ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18, 1.7 µm), eluted with 15% aqueous acetonitrile at 100 µL/min, and then separated on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 µm, 1.0 × 100 mm). All mass spectra were acquired on a Waters Xevo G2 mass spectrometer, and processed using DynamX 3.0 software. Peptides from an unlabeled protein were identified using ProteinLynx Global Server (PLGS) searches of a protein database including WT, L369/H373Q mutant, and I136T/L369/H373Q sequences. Relative deuterium levels for each peptide were calculated by subtracting the mass of the undeuterated control sample from that of the deuterium-labeled sample. Deuterium levels were not corrected for back exchange and were thus reported as relative35 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

UPLC-MS/MS for Compound Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Waters LC–MS system comprised an Acquity UPLC and a Xevo-G2 mass spectrometer (Milford, MA, USA). Sample compounds separation was performed on an Acquity UPLC BEH Shield column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm). The column temperature and the autosampler temperature were kept at 40 °C and 6 °C, respectively. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid (FA) in water was used as a mobile phase A and 0.1% FA in methanol as mobile phase B. Sample injection volume was 2 µL and the total run time of a gradient method was 6.5 min. The chromatographic method was as follows: 0.5 min—5% B, 2.0 min—40% B, 3.0 min—90% B, 4.5 min—90% B, 4.51 min—5% B. Mass spectral ionization and acquisition parameters were optimized on the Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI ion source in the positive ion mode. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing and drying gas. The ion source temperature and the desolvation temperature were maintained at 120 and 400 °C. The desolvation gas flow was set at 850 L/h and the cone gas flow was 50 L/h. The capillary voltage was set at 0.5 kV. The MassLynx software (version 4.0, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for data acquisition and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Profiling of HDL Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein composition of HDL samples was identified and quantified by the use of a Waters Xevo G2 mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation; MA, USA). In brief, the peptide samples were chromatographically separated on an M-class ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC; Waters Corporation; MA, USA) equipped with an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 Column (130 Å, 1.7 µm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm) under gradient conditions at a flow rate of 300 nL/min over 60 min at 35 °C. The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile as the organic modifier and formic acid (0.1% v/v) for molecule protonation. Peptide fragmentation was performed on a high-definition mass spectrometer (HDMS) instrument equipped with a nano-electrospray ionization (nano-ESI) and operated in the MSE mode. Parallel ion fragmentation was programmed to switch between low (4 eV) and high (15–45 eV) energies in the collision cell and data was collected from 300 to 3500 m/z utilizing glu-fibrinopeptide B as the separate data channel lock mass calibrant (m/z = 785.8426 Da; Waters Corporation; MA, USA) [39 (link)]. Data were processed with ProteinLynx GlobalServer v3.0 (Waters Corporation; MA, USA) [40 (link)] and Progenesis QI for proteomics (Nonlinear Dynamics, Waters Corporation; MA, USA). Deisotoped results were searched for protein association from the Uniprot (www.uniprot.org) human protein database [41 (link),42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Deuterium Labeling of SARS-CoV-2 Proteases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deuterium labeling was initiated with a 20-fold dilution into D2O buffer (100 mmol/L phosphate, pH 7.0) of 3CLpro protein (1 mg/mL), 3CLpro (1 mg/mL) with schaftoside (1 mmol/L), PLpro protein (1 mg/mL), or PLpro (1 mg/mL) with schaftoside (1 mmol/L). After 0.25, 0.5, and 10 min of labeling, the labeling reaction was quenched with the addition of quenching buffer (100 mmol/L phosphate, 4 mol/L GdHCl, 0.5 mol/L TCEP, pH 2.0). Samples were then injected and online digested using a Waters ENZYMATE BEH pepsin column (2.1 mm × 30 mm, 5 μm). The peptides were trapped and desalted on a VanGuard Pre-Column trap (ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18, 1.7 μm) for 3 min, eluted from the trap using 15% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 100 μL/min, and then separated using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.0 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm). All mass spectra were acquired on a Waters Xevo G2 mass spectrometer. Peptides from an unlabeled protein were identified using ProteinLynx Global Server (PLGS) searches of a protein database including 3CLpro and PLpro sequences only. Relative deuterium levels for each peptide were calculated by subtracting the mass of the undeuterated control sample from that of the deuterium-labeled sample. All mass spectra were processed using DynamX 3.0 (Waters Corporation). Deuterium levels were not corrected for back exchange and thus reported as relative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenolic Compounds Analysis in OP Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The identification of phenolic compounds of OP extract was obtained by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with electrospray ionisation (UPLC-ESI-MS) and quadrupole-time of flight detector (QTOF). The equipment was Xevo G2 mass spectrometer consisting of a hexapole, a collision cell and a time of flight analyser (QTOF) supplied by Waters (Milford, MA, USA).
The electrospray probe was used in positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI-) modes as well as sensitivity analyser mode. The mass range considered was from 10 to 1000 Da. The corona voltage was 2.5 kV for (ESI+) and 0.5 kV for (ESI-). The sampling cone voltage was optimised between 20 and 50 V. Finally, 30 V was selected for the screening because more peaks were detected. Other MS parameters were as follows: the source temperature was 150 °C, the desolvation gas temperature 450 °C and the desolvation gas flow 650 l/h. MSE mode was selected for the acquisition, and collision ramp energy from 5 to 40 V was used. Mass Lynx v.4.1 software (Waters, Milford MA, USA) was used to analyse the samples and Croma Lynx (Waters, Milford MA, USA) was used to deconvolve the spectra. Quantitative data for pulp phenolic compounds were obtained by calibration curves obtained from known standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification and Mass Analysis of Fgr-YEEI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Near-full-length Fgr-YEEI (200 pmol) was injected onto a 2 mm × 20 mm analytical guard column (Alltech) packed with POROS 20-R2 reversed-phase medium. Desalting was performed by manually flushing 1 ml of 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid over the column. The protein was eluted from the column using a Shimadzu prominence high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (LC-20AD) with a 3-min 15 to 70% acetonitrile gradient at a flow rate of 50 l/min. The eluent was directed into a Waters Xevo G2 mass spectrometer equipped with a standard electrospray source for mass analysis. Average protein mass was determined using the MassLynx v.4.1 software (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!