The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using rotor gene q pcr machine

1

CXCL1 Gene Expression and Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Allprep DNA/RNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract total RNA and genomic (g) DNA. From 1 μg of total RNA, complementary (c)DNA was synthesized using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RT-PCR was performed at specific conditions using 1 μL of cDNA, specific primers (Table 1A), a Promega GoTaq® qPCR Master mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and a Qiagen Rotor-gene qPCR machine (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Expression levels of the target gene (CXCL1) were normalized to GAPDH expression as an internal control.
For bisulfite modification of the DNA, an aliquot of gDNA (2 μg) was treated with an EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). MSP was conducted using 1 μL of the bisulfite-treated DNA, primers specifically designed for methylated and unmethylated DNA sequence of the promoter region of CXCL1 genes (Table 1B), a Promega GoTaq® qPCR Master mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and a Qiagen Rotor-gene qPCR machine (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Fully methylated and fully unmethylated control DNAs were purchased from Qiagen and were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. DNA methylation levels were calculated as described previously [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Methylation Analysis of GSDMD Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the presence of CGI in the promoter region of GSDMD gene, we used a public database available via the University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) on GRCh38/hg38 assembly (Genome Reference Consortium). Fully methylated and fully unmethylated control DNAs were purchased from Qiagen. A 2 μg of genomic DNA (gDNA) was treated with EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen). MSP was conducted using 1 μL of the sodium bisulfite-treated DNA, primers specifically designed for methylated and unmethylated DNA sequence of the promoter region of GSDMD gene (Table 1), Promega GoTaq® qPCR Master mix (Promega) and Qiagen Rotor-gene qPCR machine (Qiagen) were used. DNA methylation levels were calculated as previously described.19 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying DNA Methylation in COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic (g)DNA was extracted from whole blood samples obtained from the healthy controls (n = 5) and COVID-19 patients (n = 5 for each asymptomatic and symptomatic) using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
An aliquot gDNA (2 μg) was treated with EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen). qMSP was conducted using 1 μl of the sodium bisulfite-treated DNA, primers specifically designed for methylated and unmethylated DNA sequence of the promoter region of HSPA1L and ULBP2 genes (Supplementary Table 1), Promega GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (Promega); and analyzed using Qiagen Rotor-gene qPCR machine (Qiagen). Based on the (cycle threshold) Ct values of methylated (M) primer amplification and un-methylated (U) primer amplification for a gene, a methylation level of the gene promoter was calculated as the fraction of M molecules in the total number of bisulfite-treated DNA molecules (Ct of M molecules/Ct of M molecules + Ct of U molecules) (Paschos and Allday, 2010 (link)). For each gene, methylation levels of asymptomatic COVID-19, as well as symptomatic COVID-19 were compared amongst healthy control. Fully methylated and fully unmethylated control DNAs were purchased from Qiagen and were used as positive and negative controls, respectively and to assess the behavior and specificity of the primers used in this study (Supplementary Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from tissue fragments was isolated with RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reversed transcription was performed using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers protocol (250–1000 ng RNA per reaction). After reverse transcription, samples were diluted 10 times. 5μl of the diluted sample was added to 7.5μl of KAPA mix (KAPA PROBE FAST qPCR Master) and 2.5 μl of primers/probe mix (listed in S10 Table) (150 nM of primers, 33.3 nM TaqMan probe). Samples were analyzed using the Rotor-Gene qPCR machine (Corbett research, RG-6000). For the primers used see S10 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative real-time PCR protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription was carried out using Superscript III (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was diluted 1:5 and qRT-PCR was carried out following the manufacturer's instructions from Sensi –mix Syber green Kit (Bioline) in a Corbett Research Rotor gene qPCR machine. The primers used for the amplification are listed in Table S2. Normalization was done using the ΔΔCt method for two technical replicates and three biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared using RNeasy Plus Kit (#74134 Qiagen) following manufacturer’s instructions. 1 μg RNA was reverse transcribed using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (# 205313 Qiagen) and quantitative RT-PCR was performed using QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR Kit (#208056 Qiagen) in a Rotor-Gene Q PCR machine (Qiagen). Fold change expression was determined by the comparative Ct method (ΔΔCt) normalized to 60S Ribosomal protein L19 expression. qRT-PCR data are represented as fold increase relative to non-treated cells (Control), which were assigned to 1. Primers for quantitative RT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative HBV DNA Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracellular HBV titers were measured by qPCR, as described previously [38 (link)]. Briefly, HBV genomic DNA was purified from the culture supernatant using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, Cat No. 51306). For conventional PCR analysis of HBV DNA, genomic DNA was amplified using 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix 1 (BioFACT, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, Cat No. ST301-19h) and a primer pair, HBV 1399F (5′-TGG TAC CTG CGC GGG ACG TCC TT-3′) and HBV 1632R (5′-AGC TAG CGT TCA CGG TGG TCT CC-3′). For qPCR analysis, HBV DNA was amplified using the SYBR premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan, Cat No. RR82LR) and HBV 379F (5′-GTG TCT GCG GCG TTT TAT CA-3′) and HBV 476R (5′-GAC AAA CGG GCA ACA TAC CTT-3′) using a Rotor-gene qPCR machine (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative analysis of ALDH3A1 expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared using a RNeasy Plus Kit (#74134 Qiagen, Milan, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (#205313 Qiagen), and quantitative RT-PCR (QPCR) was performed using QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR Kit (#208056 Qiagen) in a Rotor-Gene Q PCR machine (Qiagen). Fold change expression was determined by the comparative Ct method (ΔΔCt) normalized to 60 S Ribosomal protein L19 expression. qRT-PCR data are represented as fold increase relative to nontreated cells (Control), which was set to 1. Primers for quantitative QPCR are listed in Supplementary Table S6. ALDH3A1 primers were from Qiagen (PPH07009A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RT-PCR and qRT-PCR for hpd Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) of the hpd gene, total RNA was extracted from F. kingsejongi cells in the mid-exponential phase using the Hybrid-R™ RNA Purification Kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, Seoul, South Korea). A cDNA library from the total RNA sample was synthesized using the ReverTra™ Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The RT-PCR was conducted on a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The tuf gene, encoding the translation elongation factor Tu, was served as a reference gene [41 (link)]. qRT-PCR was performed on a Rotor-Gene Q PCR machine (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) with SensiFAST™ SYBR® No-ROX one-step kit (Bioline, Cincinnati, OH, USA). Quantification was carried out using the comparative Ct (2− Δ ΔCT) method [42 (link)]. The primers used for RT- and qRT-PCR were Tuf_forward (5′-ATTCCAACAACTCAGCATCAT C-3′: the tuf gene), Tuf_reverse (5′-AGTATGAAACTGCTACCCGTC-3′: the tuf gene), Hpd_forward (5′-CTC CAATCAACGAGCACCTTA-3′: the hpd gene), and Hpd_reverse (5′- TCTTTGTAGCCC GGAAGAAAC-3′: the hpd gene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were maintained in CelLytic™MT supplemented with 2 mM Na3VO4 and 1x Protease inhibitor cocktail for mammalian cells (all reagents were from Sigma Aldrich). RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) were performed on tissue samples. RNA extraction from tumor samples started with disruption and homogenization using the TissueLyser II (#85300 Qiagen). Total RNA was prepared using RNeasy Plus Kit (#74134 Qiagen) following manufacturer’s instructions. One μg RNA was reverse transcribed using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (#205313 Qiagen) and quantitative RT-PCR was performed using QuantiNovaSYBR Green PCR Kit (#208056 Qiagen) in a Rotor-Gene qPCR machine (Qiagen). Fold change expression was determined by the comparative Ct method (ΔΔCt) normalized to GAPDH expression. qRT-PCR data are represented as fold change relative to STD group, which was assigned to 1, and expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to compare groups for statistical differences (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!