The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using snap surface 549

1

Single-Molecule Imaging of GLP1R Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GLP1RSNAP/SNAP islets were dissociated using trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) and then plated onto 25 mm clean glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine. The next day cells were incubated with SNAP-Surface549 (New England Biolabs) in complete culture medium for 20 min at 37 °C and washed 3 × 5 min using HEPES-bicarbonate buffer, leading to labeling of ~80% of surface GLP1R required for single-molecule analysis. GLP1RSNAP/SNAP islet cells were then imaged in HEPES-bicarbonate buffer supplemented with 16.7 mM D-glucose using a custom built TIRF microscope (Cairn Research) comprising an Eclipse Ti2 (Nikon, Japan) base with EMCCD camera (iXon Ultra, Andor), 561 nm diode laser, and a 100x oil-immersion objective (NA 1.49, Nikon). Image sequences were acquired with an exposure time of 30 ms. Since laser exposure leads to non-linear photobleaching, basal and stimulated conditions were studied in separate cells to allow comparison of GLP1R trajectories over the same time course and laser exposure. Automated single-particle detection and tracking were performed with the u-track software62 (link) and the obtained trajectories were further analysed using custom algorithms in the MATLAB environment, as previously described40 (link). Sub-trajectory analysis of trapped and free portions was performed using a method based on recurrence matrix63 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SNAP-tag Protein Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNAP-tag containing proteins were labeled with SNAP-Surface-488 or SNAP-Surface-549 (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with 1 hour incubation at room temperature. Unreacted substrate was removed by Zeba spin desalting column 7K MWCO (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stable SNAP-GLP-1R Cell Line Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five million INS-1 832/3 EV or g1-2 cells were seeded into 10-cm adherent dishes. Each dish was transfected with 9 μg of the SNAP–GLP-1R plasmid (Cisbio) using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Forty-eight hours later, G418 (1 mg/ml) was added to each dish to select for SNAP–GLP-1R–positive cells. The surviving cells were allowed to proliferate. Once the 10-cm dishes reached >80% confluence, cells were labeled in suspension with SNAP-Surface 549 (New England Biolabs) for 30 min at 37°C and fluorescence-activated cell-sorted to select for SNAP–GLP-1R–expressing ones. Sorted cells were then cultured and maintained in G418 (1 mg/ml) to preserve SNAP–GLP-1R expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing GLP-1R Dynamics in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
INS-1 832/3 cells stably expressing SNAP–GLP-1R were transiently transfected with a β-arrestin 2–GFP construct. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were seeded onto glass-bottom MatTek dishes and left to adhere overnight. Cells were labeled in full medium with SNAP-Surface 549 (New England Biolabs) for 30 min at 37°C and imaged in RPMI 1640 without phenol red in a Nikon Eclipse Ti spinning disk confocal microscope with an ORCA-Flash 4.0 camera (Hamamatsu) and Metamorph software (Molecular Devices). Time-lapse images of green and red fluorescences were acquired every 15 s for an initial 5-min baseline before the addition of 100 nM exendin-4 and further imaging for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dual-receptor Cell Labeling and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on poly-d-lysine pre-coated cover slips (0.0 mm thickness) to 500,000 cells per cover slip and incubated overnight in the presence or absence of doxycycline in complete DMEM. Cells that expressed HA-CLIP-hM3RASSL receptor were labeled with 5 μm CLIP-Surface 488 while those expressing VSV-SNAP-hM2WT were labeled using 5 μm SNAP-Surface 549 (New England Biolabs) in complete DMEM for 30 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cells were washed three times with complete DMEM and once with HEPES physiological saline solution (130 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 1 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 20 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, and 10 mmd-glucose). Cover slips were imaged using an inverted Nikon TE2000-E microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY) equipped with a 40× (numerical aperture-1.3) oil-immersion Pan Fluor lens and a cooled digital Photometrics Cool Snap-HQ charge-coupled device camera (Roper Scientific, Trenton, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Liquid Droplet Aggregation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formation of microscopic aggregates was assayed for the formation of liquid droplets (Lin et al., 2015 (link)). Proteins were fluorescently labeled with SNAP-Surface 549 or SNAP-Surface 649 (NEB) at 37 °C for 30 min in dark. Puri fied bacterial proteins with 2% of the protein fluorescently labeled were diluted in 37.5 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, and 1mM DTT. Reactions were performed in 96-well glass bottom plates (MatTek) coated with 3% BSA for 15 minutes and sealed with PCR plate film (USA scientific) to minimize evaporation. Images were acquired on an LSM 510 Meta Confocal Microscope (Zeiss) or an Eclipse TE2000 epifluorescence microscope (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification and Labeling of Actin-Associated Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fission yeast fimbrin SpFim1 was purified as described [38 (link)]. Human α-actinin-4, C. elegans α-actinin, SNAP-espin-2B was expressed in bacteria E. coli BL21-Codon Plus(DE3)-RP (Stratagene) cells and purified with affinity chromatography. Actin was purified from rabbit muscle acetone powder (Pel Freez Biologicals) and labeled on Cys374 with Oregon green (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) as described [39 (link), 40 (link)]. Mouse capping protein, human fascin 1 and human profilin HPRO1 were expressed in bacteria and purified as described [41 (link)–43 (link)]. Arp2/3 complex was purified from calf thymus by WASp(VCA) affinity chromatography [44 (link)]. WASP fragment construct GST-human WASp pWA was purified by Glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography [45 (link)]. Human fascin and both Human and C. elegans α-actinin were labeled with either Cy5-Monomaleimide (GE Healthcare) or TMR-6-Maleimide (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Skeletal muscle tropomyosin was purified from rabbit muscle acetone powder (Pel Freez Biologicals) and labeled as described [46 (link)]. Proteins containing SNAP fusions were labeled with SNAP-surface-549 or SNAP-surface-647 (New England BioLabs). Proteins were incubated with the dye overnight at 4°C according to manufacturer’s protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescent Labeling of SNAP-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast whole cell extract (WCE) was prepared as previously described (Crawford et al., 2007 (link)). SNAPf-tagged proteins were labeled by incubation of the lysate for 30 min at room temperature with the fluorophore (e.g., benzylguanine-Dy549/SNAP-Surface 549, New England Biolabs) before gel filtration. A fluorophore concentration of 1.1 µM was used to label SNAPf tags.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multicolor Fluorescent Labeling of CD44

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEFS, COS-7, or CHO cells were seeded sparsely and grown for 2 d on 35-mm cell culture dishes fitted with a glass coverslip at the bottom. Cells were transfected with the different SNAP-tagged CD44 plasmids 16–18 h prior to the experiment using FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent. Labeling was done with SNAP tag-specific photo-stable fluorescent probes, SNAP Alexa 546, SNAP-surface 549 (λex/λem: 560/575 nm, purchased from New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), or JF646-SNAP ligand (λex/λem: 646/664 nm) by incubating for 10 min at 37°C using a dilution of 30 nM (for single particle experiments) and 50–100 nM (for cartography experiments) with 10% serum containing F12 medium and then washed extensively with glucose-M1 buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3; supplemented with d-glucose at 2 mg/ml) to get rid of free dyes. The dyes were chosen to ensure they are spectrally different from GFP with minimum bleed-through. Dual color labeling was done with JF549-cpSNAP ligand (λex/λem: 549/571 nm) and JF646-SNAP ligand (λex/λem: 646/664 nm) fluorophores by incubating for 10 min at 37°C with F12 serum medium at mixed concentrations of 50 and 150 nM for the respective dyes. Singly or dually labeled cells were subsequently washed and imaged at 37°C in the presence of HEPES buffer containing 2 mg/ml glucose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying GLP-1R Agonist Internalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
INS‐1‐SNAP‐GLP‐1R cells were seeded the day before the assay into glass‐bottom dishes (MatTek Life Sciences, Ashland, Massachusetts). Adherent cells were then labelled with SNAP‐Surface® 549 (New England Biolabs UK, Hitchin, UK), washed with 1× phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) and imaged in Live Cell Imaging Solution (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Massachusetts). Time‐lapse confocal imaging was performed using a spinning disk confocal microscope with a 60× oil immersion objective. After a 1‐minute baseline recording, agonist was added to cells and the imaging continued for 10 minutes. Agonist‐mediated internalization was quantified in Fiji v1.53c as loss of membrane signal over time, after normalization to baseline membrane signal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!