The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using poroshell hph c18

1

Quantification of Micropollutants in Wastewater

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification and quantification of CECs spiked to MWWTP effluent were performed using an ultra high-pressure liquid chromatographer (UHPLC; Shimadzu) system connected to a QTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Impact II). Samples were filtered in 0.22-μm PVDF membranes prior to injection. The UV detector of the UHPLC was set at 240 nm. A C18 column (Agilent PoroshellHPH-C18 4.6 × 150 mm, 2.7 μM) was used with the following mobile phases: (A) methanol acidified with 0.1% formic acid and (B) water acidified with 0.1% formic acid at 0.25 mL min−1. Sixty percent of A was used until up to 8 min, the rate of A increased to 90% until 10 min, and the run proceeded in this condition until 20 min. Retention times were 6.4 min for CBZ (LOD, 0.58 μg L−1; LOQ, 1.94 μg L−1), 6.8 min for CAF (LOD, 1.33 μg L−1; LOQ, 2.92 μg L−1), and 15 min for LP (LOD, 0.71 μg L−1; LOQ, 2.38 μg L−1). The QTOF mass spectrometer was operated at positive ionization under the following conditions during all runs: capillary 4500 V, nebulizer 0.4 bar, drying gas 5 L min−1, and gas temperature 180 °C which enabled the detection of nearly 99% removal for all target compounds by monitoring the following ions: 195, 192, and 423 m/z as shown in Fig. S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Amino Acid Profiling of Eri Silkworm Pupae and Soybean Meal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amino acid composition was analysed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following the standard method of AOAC [12 ,13 ]. The ground, freeze dried eri silkworm pupae and dehulled soybean meal were hydrolysed with 6 N HCl for 16 to 18 h at 110°C. HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1290 Infinity II (UHPLC, Böblingen, Germany) with the following features: sample injection, multisample (G7167B); pump, flexible pump (G7104A); column: Agilent Poroshell HPH-C18 with guard column (40°C to maintain temperature for amino acids); detector: diode array detector (DAD; G7116B). Mobile phase A was borate buffer pH 8.2 (filtered through a 0.45 μm regenerated cellulose membrane) and mobile phase B was acetonitrile: methanol:water (45:45:10 v/v/v, all HPLC grade). For injection, 100 mL of mobile phase A was mixed with 0.4 mL of concentrated H3PO4. The flow rate was 200 μL/min. Prior to injection, amino acids were derivatised with y-phthalaldehyde and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate for primary amino acids and proline, respectively. Amino acid standard solutions was purchased from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Amino Acids HPLC-DAD Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amino acids were quantified through a HPLC-DAD method. A 1260 Infinity II LC System (Agilent, USA, 2018) was set up for the analysis. The calibration curve was made up using an amino acid mixed solution (Merck, Germany) in a concentration range between 0.078 mM and 1.25 mM. The column was an Agilent Poroshell HPH C18 (100 x 4.6 mm, 2.7 μm) coupled with a guard column (AdvanceBio Oligo 4.6 x 5 mm, 2.7 μm) and it was kept at 40°C. Mobile phases were: A - 10 mM Na2HPO4 pH=8.2 and B - Acetonitrile:Methanol:Water 45:45:10. The elution program was the following (%B): 0-0.35 min 2%, 13.4 min 57%, 13.5 min 100%, 15.7 min 100%, 15.8 min 2%, 18 min end. Flow rate was constant at 1.5 ml/min. All solvents were HPLC grade, whereas the buffer, solutions and samples were pre-filtered with a 0.22 μm filter. OPA (o-Phthaldialdehyde reagent, Merck, Germany) was chosen as derivatizing agent acting as a fluorophore. Injection volume was 10 μl. The signal used to visualize the fluorescence was set at 338 nm bandwidth 10 nm with a reference wavelength of 390 nm bandwidth 20 nm. All data were displayed and analyzed on Agilent ChemStation software. Data are expressed as g of amino acids per 100 g of extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spectrophotometric and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultraviolet−visible spectra were documented on a Nanodrop 2000C spectrophotometer (Thermo, MA, USA). Absorbance was measured on a Multiskan Spectrum (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). Polystyrene 96-well plates (KE-96−8) were acquired from Yijiamei (Xiamen, China). The LC-MS/MS experiment was performed on a AB QTRAP4500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA), and POROSHELL HPH-C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 4 µm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to separate compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Amino Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) type 1260 Infinity II HPLC consisting of a degasser, column oven (40 °C), autosampler (5 °C), and a DAD detector equipped with an Agilent Poroshell HPH-C18, 3 × 100 mm, 2.7 µm column with a guard column (HPH-C18, 3 × 5 mm; 2.7 µm), were used. Derivatization vials: borate buffer, OPA, FMOC, and injection diluent. On-line derivatization (autosampler) procedure: valve to bypass, needle wash for 10 s, wait 0.3 min, draw 2.5 µL borate buffer, draw 1 µL sample, needle wash 5 s, mix 3.5 µL in air 5 times, wait 0.2 min, draw 0.5 µL OPA, mix 4 µL in air 10 times, draw 0.4 µL FMOC, mix 4.4 µL in air 10 times, draw 32 µL from injection dilution sol., mix 20 µL in air eight times, needle wash 10 s, inject, wait 0.4 min, valve bypass. Gradient (only mobile phase B given): 0 min 2%, 0.45 min 2%, 13.5 min 57%, 13.6 min 100%, 17.6 min 100%, 18 min 2%, 23 min 2%. Mobile phase flow: 0.62 mL/min. A four-point calibration (including origin) using the two IS was drawn with R2 > 0.999 for each amino acid. Wavelengths: 338 nm for OPA derivatives (10 nm bw. 390 nm ref. and 20 nm ref. bw.) and 262 nm for FMOC derivatives (16 nm bw. 324 nm ref. and 8 nm ref. bw.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Amino Acid Extraction and Phenylalanine Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the phenylalanine content, the amino acid extraction was performed as described by Palma et al. (2015) [33 (link)] with some modifications. The lyophilized sample was homogenized in 1.5 mL of cold extraction medium (ethanol/choloroform/HCl 0.1 N) (12/5/1; v/v/v) and then supplemented with 75 µL of internal standard (norvaline 500 ppm). The extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C and 3500× g, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and then trichloromethane and HCl 0.1 N were added. The upper phase was derivatized with O-phthalaldehyde (OPA). Phenylalanine was analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1260 Infinity) with an Agilent Poroshell HPH-C18, 4.6 × 150 mm column and a fluorometer using excitation and emission wavelengths of 340 and 450 nm. Phenylalanine was eluted at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min−1, with an elution gradient composed by sodium phosphate 10 mM pH = 7.8 (A) and acetonitrile/methanol/water (45/45/10, v/v/v) (B). The gradient profile, expressed as (t [min]; %A), was: (0; 98%), (0.35; 98%), (16.5; 57%), (17; 0%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Takuan-Zuke Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of TPC in takuan-zuke was performed by fluorescence derivatization method using 4-(N,N-dimethylaminosulfonyl)-7-hydrazino-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (DBD-H) [13 (link)]. The lyophilized sample (10–50 mg) was added to 250 µL of 0.1% DBD-H in acetonitrile, 250 µL of 0.2 mM anisaldehyde in acetonitrile, and 500 µL of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in 60% (v/v) acetonitrile. The reaction mixture was shaken and incubated at 25 °C for 60 min. To 200 µL of the supernatant after centrifugation, 50 µL of 500 mM McIlvaine buffer (pH 5) and 50 mg of NaCl were added and shaken. The acetonitrile phase was considered the sample for HPLC.
Analytical HPLC was performed with an Agilent 1200–1260 system with a Poroshell HPH-C18 (100 × 3.0 mm ø, 2.7 μm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The flow rate was set at 0.85 mL/min and the column temperature was set to 40 °C. Elution was achieved using a gradient of two eluents: H2O as eluent A and acetonitrile as eluent B. The gradient program was: 25% B rising to 73% B at 5.5 min, further increasing to 100% B at 5.6 min, and remaining at 100% B to 5.99 min. Finally, the separation column was equilibrated using 25% B from 5.99 to 8.0 min. Fluorescence was detected with excitation at 450 nm and emission at 565 nm. Anisaldehyde was used as an internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Glyburide in Antidiabetic Tea

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation was as follows: a further 24 samples from the same antidiabetic health-care tea powders (2.10) were weighed by 1.000 g into a 15 mL centrifuge tube, randomly divided into 6 parts, five parts were spiked with 40, 80, 120, 160 and 320 ng glyburide (10 μg/ mL, prepared in methanol) respectively and the last part was kept as a negative sample (true negative). All the samples were vortex for 3 min and placed in the oven at 37℃ overnight to dry. The rest of the analysis steps follow the previous description (2.10). CG-LFIA and LC-MS/MS were employed to analyze all the samples in triplicates.
The confirmation test was performed on LC-MS/MS (AB QTRAP4500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer). Agilent Poroshell HPH-C18 (2.1×150 mm, 4μm) was used to resolve the analytes. The column temperature was set to 40°C. Mobile phase A was aqueous solution containing 0.1% formic acid, and B is a 100% acetonitrile. All mobile phases were sonicated for 5 minutes before use. The gradient elution was : 0∼7 min, 20%∼90% B; 7∼8 min, 90% B; 8∼10 min, 10% B. The mobile phase flow rate was set at 300 μL/min and the injection volume of the sample was 10 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanoparticle Characterization and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XYZ 3060 Dispensing Platform (BioDot, Inc., USA), strip cutter ZQ 2000 (kinbio Tech. Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), Nano Drop 2000C ultra-violet spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), FEI/Talos L120C TEM microscope (Thermo Scientific, USA), Evolution™ 300 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), Lynx 4000 centrifuge (Thermo Scientific, USA), DEM-3 automatic plate washer (Top Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) , AB QTRAP4500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, USA), POROSHELL HPH-C18
(2.1×150 mm, 4μm, Agilent, USA), Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Panalytical, UK) and PowerPac Universal (Bio-Rad, USA) were used in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!