The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ti inverted microscope

Manufactured by Nikon
Sourced in Japan, United States, Germany

The Ti inverted microscope is a high-performance microscope designed for advanced scientific and research applications. It features a sturdy, inverted design that provides a stable platform for observing samples. The Ti inverted microscope is equipped with a range of sophisticated optics and illumination systems that enable clear, detailed imaging of specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

116 protocols using ti inverted microscope

1

CFBE Monolayers Infected with RSV and P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CFBE-wt cells were seeded at a high density and grown as a confluent monolayer on glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific) for 7 days prior to use (23 (link)), at which point the cells form tight junctions that are capable of excluding bacterial transit to the bottom of the monolayer. For coinfection assays, cells were infected with RSV constitutively expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) diluted in MEM to an MOI of 1 for 6 h. Cells were returned to growth medium for 18 h prior to inoculation with P. aeruginosa. Bacteria were inoculated at an MOI of 25. Bacteria were allowed to attach for 2 h before unattached bacteria were removed by perfusion with MEM supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine at 20 ml/h (23 (link)). After 2 h of biofilm development, 10 random z-stacks were collected from each chamber using a Nikon Ti-inverted microscope to obtain “pretreatment” images. MEM supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine containing vehicle or 10 µM WLBU2 was then perfused through the chamber. After 1 h of treatment, 10 random z-stacks were collected from each chamber using a Nikon Ti-inverted microscope to obtain “posttreatment” images. Biofilm biomass was quantified using Nikon Elements software (5 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Huh-7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One day prior to study, Huh-7 cells ± CD81 and/or CD19 were seeded into standard 24-well plates at 1.2 × 104 cells/well. The cells were then fixed (in situ) in 2% formaldehyde, blocked, and stained, as described for flow cytometry, with the inclusion of a 10-min 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole counterstain at the end of the procedure. The samples were imaged on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope, through a 40× extra-long working distance objective, using a C2 confocal scan head with 405- and 635-nm laser illumination (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). Multiple Z-stacks were acquired for each sample. The data were processed for display using FIJI/ImageJ (82 (link), 83 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence Imaging of Circulating Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence imaging was done on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope (Swanson Biotechnology Center Microscopy Core Facility). All imaging of CTCs was performed at 40× magnification. Images were taken on a Photometrics CoolSnap HQ camera. The diameter of each cell was found by taking the maximum Feret’s diameter of the fluorescence EpCAM signal after background subtraction using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualization of Lymph Node Stromal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of LN stromal cells by confocal microscopy, LNs were isolated on day 7 after transplantation and frozen in OCT (Cellpath). Sections (8 μm) were cut on a cryostat, dried, and fixed with acetone (–20°C). Primary antibodies were CD31-FITC (clone MEC13.3, BD Biosciences) and gp38-biotin (eBio8.1.1, eBioscience). Secondary antibodies were anti-FITC Alexa 488 (Life Technologies) and Streptavidin eFluor 570 (eBioscience). Sections were stained with DAPI and mounted with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Life Technologies). All images were captured on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope using a C2 confocal scan head (Nikon Instruments). Images were acquired with a 40× (Plan Apochromat N.A. 0.095 W.D. 0.21 mm) objective. Image analysis was done using the software ImageJ (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Viral Binding and Entry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study virus binding and entry by detection of viral DNA, HFFs were infected at 4°C for 1 h to allow virus binding. The cells were washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then either lysed immediately for analysis by qPCR for genomes (using UL138 primers as noted below) or temperature shifted to 37°C to promote viral entry. Fifteen minutes postentry, DNA was harvested from the cells and analyzed by qPCR. To assess virus binding by direct visualization of virus particles, HFFs were first labeled with 1 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Tocris) for 10 min at 37°C. The cells were then washed in ice-cold PBS and infected at 4°C at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 with TB40/E-UL32-GFP HCMV for 1 h. The cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and live cells were visualized directly by confocal imaging using a 60× objective on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope with a C2 confocal scan head (Nikon). Z-stacks were acquired at high zoom to create representative images, while z-stacks of multiple low-zoom fields were acquired to allow quantification. ImageJ was used to process images for display.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence and SEM Imaging of hMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hMSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma Aldrich) for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton-X (Sigma Aldrich) for 15 min, and blocked with 10% goat serum (Sigma Aldrich) for >2 hours, all at room temperature. hMSCs were then incubated with Alexa488-phallodin (1:40 v/v in PBS, Life Technologies) for 10 minutes followed by counterstaining with Hoechst (Sigma Aldrich, 2 μg/ml) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Imaging was performed with either a Nikon Ti inverted microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA) or a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were processed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
For SEM, hMSCs were fixed and then dehydrated with a series of graded ethanol washes (25%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% × 3; 10 minutes each) before being stored in a desiccator overnight. Samples were then sputter coated with gold (Cressington Scientific, Watford, United Kingdom) and imaged under SEM (Hitachi S-4200, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 1–10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent Protein Imaging of Mitochondria and ER

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 35-mm glass-bottomed tissue culture dishes (MatTek Corp.) prior to infection with an adenoviral vector expressing either the mitochondrially targeted (mFAP), or ER targeted (ER-FAP) fluorogen activating protein44 . At 48 hrs following transfection, cells were pre-stained with 10 μM liperfluo (green) for 30 min before cells were treated with 100 nM RSL3. Before imaging, cells were also loaded with 5 nM malachite green to reveal the mFAP transgene (thereby defining the mitochondria or ER compartments45 . All images were acquired using a Nikon Ti inverted microscope (Nikon Inc.) equipped with a 60X 1.49NA oil optic, SpectraX diode based light source (Lumencor), Chroma Technology Inc. filer sets, and an ORCA-Flash4.0 V2 digital cMOS camera (Hamamatsu photonic K.K.). Images were acquired and analyzed using NIS-Elements software (Nikon Inc.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Bacterial Clustering Contrast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown as described above using the following inducer concentrations: 0.3 μM NaSal for CheA::mYFP/CheW; 13 μM IPTG for Tar-YFP; and 50 μM IPTG for mYFP-CheR. Cells were placed on a 1% agarose pad and covered with a coverslip. Fluorescence images were obtained at 30°C using a Nikon Ti inverted microscope equipped with a 100× Plan-Fluor objective (1.3 NA), a xenon lamp (Sutter Instruments), and a camera (Andor Technology). Images were then analyzed to extract clustering contrast values by computing the ratio of peak intensity (highest) to body intensity (mean of cell without the poles) in each cell after subtraction of the background fluorescence intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

FRAP Analysis of Filopodia Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FRAP experiment was performed on a motorized Nikon Ti inverted microscope equipped with the Perfect Focus System (Nikon, Japan) using a Plan Apo 60x/1.4 oil immersion objective lens, 491 nm laser (iLas2 FRAP-3D; Roper Scientific, France), CSU-22 spinning disk confocal scanning head (Yokogawa Electric Corp., Japan), and an Evolve EM-CCD camera (Photometrics, USA). Transiently transfected (using Lipofectamine 2000) Hela cells expressing GFP-IRSp53 and GFP-I-BAR (IRSp53 mutant) cultures were prepared in 35 mm glass bottom Willco dishes(WillCo Wells, The Netherlands) and maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified environment using an on-stage incubator (Chamlide, Live Cell Instruments, S. Korea). Time-lapse image acquisitions were controlled using MetaMorph software (150 ms exposure, EM-gain 300) and FRAP setting was controlled through the iLas2 control window. The bleaching was carried out on filopodia with a rectangular region using 100% laser power and imaged with 15% laser power. Five pre-bleach images at 0.5 s interval was recorded before FRAP bleaching. The FRAP recovery was recorded for another 90 frames at every 0.5 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

STAT3 Decoy Oligonucleotide Impacts HUVEC Motility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5×105 HUVECs were plated in a 10 cm dish and transfected with either the STAT3 mutant control oligonucleotide or the FAM-tagged STAT3 decoy oligonucleotide. Twenty four hours after transfection, 5×104 HUVECs were plated on top of Matrigel in a 0.17 mm clear Delta T Dish (BioptechsInc, Butler, PA). The cells were placed in 37°C for 15 minutes to allow adherence and were subsequently imaged on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope with perfect focus using phase contrast at 10×. Images were captured every 10 minutes for 24 hours in 8 unique fields with a Roper Scientific Cascade 1K camera using MetaMorph 7.73 software. Cell tracking was performed with the track objects application in Metamorph to obtain mean distance traveled, mean velocity and distance from origin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!