The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ventana automated immunostainer

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

The Ventana automated immunostainer is a laboratory equipment designed for the automated preparation and staining of tissue samples for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. It performs the automated steps of deparaffinization, rehydration, antigen retrieval, primary antibody incubation, and detection, enabling efficient and consistent IHC staining of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using ventana automated immunostainer

1

ALK Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ALK IHC was carried out on 3-μm thick tissue using a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, the slides were deparaffinized using EZ Prep (Ventana Medical Systems) at 75°C for 4 minutes and heat pretreatment at 100°C for 20 minutes. The antibody for ALK (mouse monoclonal, clone 5A4, Novocastra, Newcastle, United Kingdom) was diluted to 1:30 and incubated at 42°C for 2 hours. Signals were detected with an iView detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems) based on a streptavidin-biotin method. Mayer's hematoxylin was used for counterstaining for 2 minutes at room temperature. ALK expression was semiquantitatively assessed based on the intensity of staining and the proportion of stained cells and scored by two independent pathologists (IG Do and KM Kim). An IHC score was assigned as 0 (no staining), 1+ (faint cytoplasmic staining in ≤10% of tumor cells), 2+ (moderate, smooth cytoplasmic staining), and 3+ (intense, granular cytoplasmic staining). IHC scores of 2+ or 3+ were regarded as ALK IHC positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining for IDO (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), CD68 (Dako, Carpinteria, California, USA), CD163 (Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), CD4 (Novocastra), CD8 (Dako), and FOXP3 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was performed on the TMA blocks following a standard protocol using a Ventana Automated Immunostainer (Ventana, Benchmark, Tuscan, AZ USA). After deparaffinization, heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (CC1 protocol, Ventana). Reactivity was detected using the Ultra-View detection kit (Ventana).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Apoptosis Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed according to the method previously described [58 (link)]. Briefly, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at a thickness of 4 µm, and tissues were then stained with anti-Bax (1:3000 dilution), anti-Bcl-xL (1:150 dilution) and anti-active caspase-3 antibody (1:100 dilution) using a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s stated protocol. Quantification of immunoreactivity was assessed using ImageJ Fiji software, version 1.2 [59 (link),60 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of ROS1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC for ROS1 was performed on 4 μm-thick FFPE tissues, using rabbit primary monoclonal ROS1 antibody D4D6 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) with a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (S1 file). IHC staining scores for ROS1 were assessed as follows: score 3+ for strong, granular cytoplasmic staining diffusely and homogenously in most tumor cells (Fig 2A); score 2+ for moderate, smooth cytoplasmic staining in most tumor cells with occasional strong staining (Fig 2B); score 1+ for faint, focal cytoplasmic staining less than the score 2+ criteria (Fig 2C); and score 0 for the complete absence of staining (Fig 2D). IHC scoring was performed by three pathologists unaware of the FISH results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Examination of Placenta and Umbilical Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The placenta and umbilical cord samples were submitted for histological examination in neutral-buffered 10% formalin. They were dehydrated according to the standard techniques, embedded in paraffin, cut to 5-mm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with the labeled streptavidin–biotin peroxidase detection system using the Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical systems, Tucson, AZ). The following antibodies were tested: CD31 (dilution 1:50), CD34 (dilution 1:50), cytokeratins (AE1/AE3 clone; dilution 1:50); all from Dako, Glostrup, Denmark. Endothelial cells of the umbilical vessels and amnion epithelium of the umbilical cord were used as internal controls for pan-cytokeratin and CD31 antibody respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ALK-positive NSCLC Adenocarcinoma Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients with NSCLC, adenocarcinoma histology, whose tumors were found to be positive for EML4-ALK fusion gene using IHC, were considered for this study. Permission was obtained from the Ethics Committee before the start of the study. Clinical characteristics and treatment details were collected from the patient's medical records. ALK gene rearrangement was detected by IHC using a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Illkirch Graffenstaden, France). IHC was assayed on 4 μm neutral buffered formalin fixed; paraffin-embedded tumor tissues using a primary rabbit monoclonal ALK antibody (mAb) clone D5F3 obtained from Ventana USA. IHC staining was performed using a Ventana benchmark XT immunostainer. The slides were dried at 60°C for 1 h, deparaffinized using EZ Prep at 75°C for 4 min, and incubated with the primary mAb at a dilution of 1:50 for 1 h at 37°C. Detection was performed using a multimer technology system with the UltraView Universal DAB detection kit.
The primary endpoint of this study was PR. The width of the resultant confidence intervals (CIs) for parameters to be estimated was constructed with a significance level of 0.05, i.e., a 95% CI. OS and PFS were analyzed with the use of Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and estimates were provided with 95% CIs. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 8.02 (SAS Institute Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Staining of Mannose Phosphate Isomerase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out in the Anatomic and Molecular Pathology (AMP) Core Lab, Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis with IRB approval. IHC was performed by a standard protocol on Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). Antigen retrieval for anti-Mannose phosphate isomerase antibody (rabbit monoclonal, clone EPR10234, AbCam) was performed with CC2 buffer (Cell Conditioning 2; citrate-based buffer pH 6.0, Ventana Medical System) for 68 min at 95 degrees. Sections incubated with primary antibodies for 40 min at 37 degrees. Biotin-free multimer technology system, based on direct linkers between peroxidase and secondary antibodies (ultraView Universal DAB Detection Kit, Ventana Medical System) was used as detection kit. The PMI staining was validated by Z.Z. and Z.A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HIF-1α, CA IX, and GLUT1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surgical specimens were immediately transferred from the operating room to the laboratory, fixed in 10 % formaldehyde for four days, and embedded in paraffin. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 4 um and stained with antibody against HIF-1α (ab2185, 1:50, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) (ab15086, 1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) (ab652, 1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) using a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Signals were detected using a DAB Map detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems) based on the labeled streptavidin-biotin method. The frequency of nuclear staining was evaluated without knowledge of clinical or pathologic status. Five fields (x200) were analyzed to determine the frequency of HIF-1α stained nuclei. At least 500 tumor cells in the five fields were counted. HIF-1α staining was evaluated using a semiquantitative grading system based on the number of tumor cells with completely dark stained nuclei within the tumor tissue (0: none, 1: less than 10 % positivity, 2: 10 % or greater positivity). Occasional cytoplasmic staining was ignored because active HIF-1α is located only in the nucleus [14 (link)]. Stained slides were graded independently by a single pathologist (HS Shim).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Lymph Node

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All pathologic slides of lymph node were reviewed by an experienced pathologist to confirm pN0. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was sectioned at a thickness of 4 µm. The tissues were then stained with CK clone AE1/AE3 (1:200 dilution), Epithelial antigen clone BerEp4 (1:100 dilution), and p53 clone DO-7 (1:5,000 dilution) using a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s stated protocol. The quantification of immunoreactivity was assessed using ImageJ Fiji software, version1.2. The immunohistological slides were meticulously reviewed by an experience pathologist with expertise in the field. The pathologist maintained a blinded approach throughout the review process, ensuring they were unaware of any relevant clinical information about the patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated IHC for Ki-67 Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed with a Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA). Tissue sections 4 μm thick were cut, dried, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and heated following a standard protocol. Primary Ki-67 antibody (MIB-1, DAKO, Denmark) was used at 1:200 dilution with the DAB detection system (Ventana) protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!