The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanodrop spectrophotometer

Manufactured by EQT
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, France

The Nanodrop spectrophotometer is a lab equipment designed to measure the concentration and purity of nucleic acid or protein samples. It uses a small sample volume to determine the absorbance at multiple wavelengths, allowing for accurate quantification of the samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using nanodrop spectrophotometer

1

Quantifying RNA Expression in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from HeLa cells lysed in RLT buffer using the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN, Crawley, UK). The RNA was quantified with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Labtech, Ringmer, UK), and reverse transcription of 1 µg mRNA was performed using the Quantitect Reverse Transcription Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN). Primers were designed using the NCBI primer design tool for NR1H2, NR1H3 and the reference gene ribosome-like protein 19 (RPL19; Supplementary Table 2). Quantitative PCR was performed in 25 µl reaction volumes comprising 12.5 µl QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN), 0.25 µL forward primer, 0.25 µl reverse primer, 10.5 µl nuclease-free water, and 1.5 μl cDNA on white low-profile 96-well plates (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Thermal cycling parameters were a cycle of 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s, using the CFX Connect Real-time thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Gene expression analysis was performed according to the MIQE guidelines (36 (link)). Standard curves were generated from serial dilutions of mRNA extracted from untreated HeLa cells. Gene expression was analyzed in triplicate using the appropriate standard curve quantification cycle, and mRNA expression normalized to RPL19.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying miRNA expression from muscle samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
miRNAs were extracted from muscle samples of right and left Biceps femoris of each animal. The mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and microRNAs were finally eluted with 100 μL of water and quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Labtech, Wilmington Delaware, USA). Reverse Transcription reactions were carried out on 5 ng of miRNAs using the TaqMan miRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and miRNA-specific stem loop primers for miR-1, miR-133a, miR-206, miR-222, and miR-486 (Applied Biosystems miRNA assays). Real-time PCR reactions were performed at least in duplicate with miRNA-specific primers and Taqman® probes on the CFX96 PCR System (BioRad). Data were normalized using U6 snRNA (RNU6B) as an internal control and differential expression was calculated using the 2-∆∆Ct method. For each miRNA, statistical differences between two groups were analysed by a Mann–Whitney test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serum miRNA Quantification in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum samples were pooled together for each mouse group (n = 10). RNA extraction was performed with the mirVanaTM PARISTM kit (Thermo Fisher). RNA was eluted in 50 μL RNase-free water, concentrated in 10 μL after NaOAc precipitation, and quantified by using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ND8000 Labtech, Wilmington, DE, USA). Quantification of miRNAs was performed using Exiqon miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA PCR. Total RNA (20 ng) was converted into poly(A) primed universal cDNA, and microRNAs were quantified in duplicate for each sample with miRNA-specific LNA primers on the LightCycler480 (Roche) following the manufacturer’s guidelines (miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-1, miR-206, and miR-378). Quantification cycle (Cq) values were calculated with the LightCycler 480 SW 1.5.1 using the 2nd derivative max method. qRT-PCR results, expressed as raw Cq, were normalized to the miRNAs identified as the most stable, miR-16, miR-142-3p, and miR-223. The relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR for GZM-B Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) and quantified by a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Labtech). Specifically, 5x106 cells were pelleted, washed with cold PBS, and resuspended in 1 mL Trizol. Cells were then incubated with 1-bromo-3-chloropropane (Sigma), washed first with Isopropyl alcohol and then with 75% Ethanol, and then resuspended in Nuclease Free-water (Invitrogen). After quantification, 2000 ng of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using the SuperScript II First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To evaluate the expression levels of GZM-B and GAPDH (internal control), quantitative real time PCR (QRT-PCR) was performed using SYBR GREEN PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystem), after optimization of the primer conditions as in our prior studies 8 (link). Primers used for quantitative RT-PCR are listed in the Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying VEGF Expression in MG-63 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted 24 hours after transfection with the RNeasy plus minikit (Qiagen) following manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were evaluated with a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Labtech). cDNA synthesis was carried out with Superscript Vilo kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gene expression was quantified by quantitative PCR. Each 25 µL reaction contained 12.5 µl SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 250 nM of each primer, and 1ul cDNA. All reactions were carried out in triplicate on an AB7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Initial activation was at 95 °C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds and 60 °C for 60 seconds. The 2-ΔΔCt method was used for the relative quantification of gene expression in MG-63VEGF165 cells compared to MG-63GFP cells, and data were normalized to β-actin expression. Primer sequences used were VEGF forward CACACAGGATGGCTTGAAGA, VEGF reverse AGGGCAGAATCATCACGAAG, β-actin forward GGCATCCTCACCCTGAAGTA and β-actin reverse AGGTGTGGTGCCAGATTTTC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from samples in Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of RNA was determined by optical densities at 230 nm, 260 nm and 280 nm using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Labtech, Uckfield, UK), and cDNA produced from 500ng RNA using Superscript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen) following manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Serum and Muscle miRNA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A specific miRNA extraction was performed for serum samples (around 100 μL) using the mirVanaTM PARISTM kit (ThermoFisher). RNA was first eluted in 50 μl RNase-free water and concentrated after NaOAc precipitation. The RNA pellet was finally resuspended in 10 μl RNase free water. For muscle samples, total RNA extraction was performed from frozen sections corresponding to approximately 1 mm thick of muscle transverse sections from Gastrocnemius Anterior (Ga) by the Trizol method (Invitrogen). RNA was eluted in 20 μl RNase-free water and treated with Free DNA kit (Ambion) to remove residual DNA. Total RNA extracted for each sample was quantified by using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ND8000 Labtech, Wilmington Delaware).
Quantification of miRNAs was performed using Exiqon miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT microRNA PCR. Total RNA (20 ng) was converted into poly-A primed universal cDNA and microRNAs were quantified in duplicate for each sample with miRNA-specific LNA primers on the LightCycler480 (Roche) following manufacturer’s guidelines. Quantification cycle (Cq) values were calculated with the LightCycler® 480 SW 1.5.1 using 2nd Derivative Max method. RT-qPCR results, expressed as raw Cq were normalized to the miRNAs identified as the most stable, miR-16 for individual assays in serum, and miR-93 in muscle samples. The relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying B12-mediated CD320 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA in Hep G2 cells and mice liver tissues of different concentration of B12 were isolated using Qiazol (Qiagen, Manchester, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RNA quantification, quality and integrity (260/230 and 260/280 ratios and concentrations) were carried out using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Labtech, Heathfield, UK). Total RNA (300 ng) was reverse transcribed to cDNA using reverse M-MLV transcriptase (ThermoScientific, Loughborough, UK). Gene expression of CD320 in the Hep G2 cell line (CD320: cat no Hs00213164_m1; TCN2: cat no Hs00165902_m1; Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Horsham, UK) and mice liver tissues (CD320: forward primer—GGTCCAAGTCTCCGGCTCTA-, reverse primer–AGCACATGACTCAATCCTACAGT; TCN2: forward primer—CTTTGCTGGATCTTCCTTGG, reverse primer—TCCTGGGGTTTGTAGTCAGC; Merck Life Science UK Ltd, Dorset, UK) were determined by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR Thermal Cycler, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Horsham, UK). The housekeeping genes, 18s rRNA in the HepG2 cell line (cat no 4319413E; Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Horsham, UK) and L19 in mice liver tissues (forward primer—GGAAAAAGAAGGTCTGGTTGGA, reverse primer—TGATCTGCTGACGGGAGTTG; Merck Life Science UK Ltd, Dorset, UK) were used to determine relative gene expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Brain Tumor Mutation Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using the QIAampDNA mini‐kit® (Qiagen Inc., Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Tissues were disrupted in lysis buffer. After removing the paraffin, the DNA was purified via sequential centrifugation through membrane spin columns. The purity and quantity of DNA were assessed by measuring the absorbance ratio at 260/280 nm with a NanoDrop® Spectrophotometer (LabTech, Palaiseau, France). A brain tumor gene mutation panel was developed using the MassARRAY iPlex technology and MassARRAY online design tools (Agena Bioscience), and included IDH1 mutations, IDH2 mutations, H3F3A mutations (codon 27–34), HIST1H3B mutations (codon 27) FGFR1 mutations, TERT mutations, and BRAF mutations (V600E). The MassARRAY iPlex procedure involves a three‐step process consisting of the initial polymerase chain reaction (PCR), inactivation of unincorporated nucleotides by shrimp alkaline phosphatase, and a single‐base primer extension. Afterwards, the products are nano‐dispensed onto a matrix‐loaded silicon chip (SpectroChipII, Ageno Bioscience). Finally, the mutations are detected by matrix‐assisted laser desorption‐ionization–time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry. Data analysis was performed using MassARRAY Typer Analyzer software 4.0.4.20 (Ageno Bioscience), which facilitates the visualization of data patterns as well as the raw spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini or micro kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Santa Clara, CA, USA), quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Labtech, Wilmington, DE, USA) after DNase treatment (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and converted to cDNA by reverse transcription as described previously [64 (link)]. Oligonucleotide primers used for semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of gene expression were designed using Oligo Primer Analysis Software v.7 (Molecular Biology Insights Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, USA) and are listed in Additional file 4: Table S2. Data were normalized to mRNA levels of the housekeeping gene RPS18 and were calculated using the 2–∆Ct method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!