The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using spd m20a diode

1

Spectrophotometric Analysis of Fatty Acid Hydroperoxide Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UV spectra of the reaction mixtures were scanned during the incubations of CYP440A18 with fatty acid hydroperoxides with Varian Cary 50 spectrophotometer. Alternatively, the UV spectra of products were recorded online during the HPLC separations using an SPD-M20A diode array detector (Shimadzu, Japan). Products (Me esters or Me/TMS derivatives) were analyzed by GC–MS as described previously [21 (link)]. GC–MS analyses were performed using a Shimadzu QP5050A mass spectrometer connected to a Shimadzu GC-17A gas chromatograph equipped with an MDN-5S (5% phenyl 95% methylpolysiloxane) fused capillary column (length, 30 m; ID 0.25 mm; film thickness, 0.25 µm). Helium at a flow rate of 30 cm/s was used as the carrier gas. Injections were made in the split mode using an initial column temperature of 120 °C, injector temperature 230 °C. The column temperature was raised at 10 °C/min until it reached 240 °C. Electron impact ionization (70 eV) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromatographic Profiling of M. sylvestris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatographic analysis of M. sylvestris samples was performed by an HPLC system equipped with SPD-M20A diode array detector (DAD, Shimadzu, Japan). The separation was achieved on a Kinetex C18 (2.6 µm × 2.1 mm × 10 mm) column at RT. For the detection of phenols and flavonoids, the mobile phase was composed of dH2O (solvent A) and isopropanol (solvent B). The gradient elution was set as follows: t0min (A 85%, B 15%); t20min (A 65%, B 35%); t55min (A 10%, B 90%); t68min (A 85%, B 15%); t70min (end run). The flow rate was fixed at 0.95 mL/min, while the injection volume was of 10 µL. The detection was carried out by monitoring the eluate at 280 nm. The plant metabolites were identified and quantified by direct comparison with different concentrations of relative pure standards (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), based on retention time, absorbance spectrum, and chromatographic peak area. The amount of each detected molecule was expressed as nanograms per milligram of fresh material weight (ng/mg FMW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC/DAD Analysis of Brazilian Green Propolis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brazilian green propolis (EPP-AF®) extract and gel were evaluated using an HPLC/DAD system (Shimadzu apparatus equipped with a CBM-20 A controller, a LC-20AT quaternary pump, an SPD-M 20 A diode-array detector, and Shimadzu LC solution software, version 1.21 SP1) coupled to a Shimadzu Shim-Pack CLC-ODS column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm particle diameter, 100 Å pore diameter). The mobile phase consisted of methanol (HPLC grade) and a water-formic acid solution (0.1% v/v), pH 2.7 (A). The method consisted of a linear gradient of 20%–95% methanol over a period of 77 min at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Detection was set at 275 nm, in accordance with a previously published protocol (Berretta et al., 2012 (link)). Samples were diluted in 5 mL of methanol in 10 mL volumetric flasks, subjected to sonication for 10 min and filled to volume with Milli-Q water. All samples were filtered through a 0.45 µm filter before analysis. The chemical references used were caffeic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, L: SLBZ6416), p-coumaric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, L: 091M119V), 3,5 dicaffeoylquinic acid (Phytolab, L. 3215), 4,5–dicaffeoylquinic acid (Phytolab, L. 9943), galangin (Sigma-Aldrich: BCCG2648), artepillin C (Phytolab, L: 111674647), as well as aromadendrin-4′-O-methyl ether, drupanin and baccharin previously isolated by De Sousa et al. (2007) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ACE Inhibition Assay by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ACE inhibition rate was determined using HPLC. A Shimadzu LC‐2010A HT system (Shimadzu) equipped with VP‐ODS C18 column and SPD‐M20A diode array detector with detection wavelength of 283 nm was used. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and water (3:7, v/v,) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min and a column temperature of 30°C. Sample solution, ACE, and HHL were prepared using BBS (0.1mol/L, pH 8.3) containing 0.3 mol/L KCl as a solvent. Sample solution (40 μl) was transferred to a test tube, and 20 μl of ACE and 100 μl of HHL (5 mol/L) were added. The mixture was incubated for 1 hr at 37°C, and HCl (1 mol/L) was used to stop the reaction. The treated sample solution (10 μl) was filtered through a 0.45 μm microporous membrane and then injected into the HPLC to determine the amount of Hip. The ACE scavenging capacity was determined as follows. Inhibition(%)=A0-A1/A1×100% where A0 is the peak area of Hip in the blank group and A1 is the peak area of Hip of the sample. Peak areas were determined by the software that came with the instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification and Characterization of Me Esters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The products (Me esters) were separated using RP-HPLC on a Macherey–Nagel Nucleosil 5 ODS column (250 × 4 mm, 5 μm) using the solvent mixture methanol/water (linear gradient from 60:40 to 96:4, by volume) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The peaks of the products were collected and purified using NP-HPLC, as described in the previous section. All HPLC analyses were performed with a Shimadzu LC-20AB solvent delivery pump with UV spectral monitoring (190–370 nm) using a Shimadzu SPD-M20A diode array detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Separate products were collected after NP-HPLC separation, redissolved in [2H6]benzene, and then, the NMR spectra were recorded. For additional qualitative information, the products (Me/TMS) were re-analyzed using GC-MS after hydrogenation over PtO2 or after sequential NaBH4 reduction, hydrogenation, methylation, and trimethylsilylation.
Product 1 collected after the NP-HPLC purification was dissolved in [2H6]benzene and subjected to the NMR spectral records. Then, product 1 was reduced with NaBH4 to compound 2, which was finally purified using NP-HPLC, as described in the previous section. Then, product 2 was dissolved in [2H6]benzene, and its NMR spectra were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Carotenoid Analysis in Sea Buckthorn

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual carotenoid content was determined using RP-HPLC, which was performed using a Shimadzu LC-20AT with an SPD-M20A diode array detector (DAD) (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), as described by Ghendov-Mosanu et al. [10 (link)]. Comparison of the UV–Vis spectra and the retention times of the sample peaks with those of the standard solutions and spectral data reported in the literature allowed for the identification of carotenoids from sea buckthorn samples (Table 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!