The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Image lab version 6

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

Image Lab version 6.0 is a software application developed by Bio-Rad for the analysis and quantification of images obtained from various gel electrophoresis and Western blotting techniques. The software provides tools for image capture, processing, and analysis to support researchers in their data analysis workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

48 protocols using image lab version 6

1

Quantifying Protein Expression in Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient PBMCs were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with cOmplete™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and PhosSTOP (Roche) on ice. Protein concentration was determined using DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and samples prepared in 1x NuPage loading buffer (Invitrogen™) with 1x NuPage Sample Reducing Agent (Invitrogen™). Samples were run on NuPage Bis-Tris 4-12% (Invitrogen™) and NuPage Tris-Acetate 3–8% (Invitrogen™) gels and transferred using iBlot dry transfer system (Invitrogen™). Membranes were blocked 1h at RT using 5% bovine serum albumin or milk in PBSt 0.1% Tween-20 and primary antibody incubated over-night at 4°C, ENO1 (Abcam, #ab155102), ENO3 (Abcam, #ab126259), HIF-1α (BdBioscience, #610959), Akt (Abcam, #ab2771), Akt(S473) (Abcam, #ab81283), mTOR (Abcam, #ab32028), mTOR(S2448) (Abcam, #ab109268), S6K1 (Abcam, #ab32529), S6K1(T389 + T412) (Abcam, #ab60948), 4EBP1 (Abcam, #ab32024), 4EBP1(T37) (Abcam, #ab75767), or β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, #A5441). The secondary antibody (Dako, Aglient) was incubated 1h at RT prior detection using Amersham ECL/ECL select (GE Healthcare). Relative protein quantification was analysed using ImageLab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories), results analysed using Mann-Whitney U-test or unpaired t-test and visualized using Prism 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software) (significance level, p<0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Reverse Transcription and Real-Time PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNase treated RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Maxima Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher CAT# EP0741) with random hexamers unless otherwise noted. cDNA was then diluted 1:5 in ddH2O prior to qPCR. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen CAT# 4309155). Real time PCR was performed using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad CAT#1855195). All data was analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX software. End point PCR was performed using Taq polymerase at optimized cycle number, and products were run on 1%–2.5% Agarose gels with EtBr prior to imaging. Quantification of band intensity was performed using Image Lab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad). PCR Primer sequences can be found in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring ATM Kinase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ATM kinase activity was measured by monitoring phosphorylation of the MBP-p53102 peptide substrate. Gels were stained using InstantBlue stain, and after destaining in water, gels were visualized using a ChemiDoc MP imaging system. Phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated substrate band intensities from Phos-tag gels were quantified using Bio-Rad Laboratories Image Lab version 6.0.1. Initial rates were calculated by measuring the ratio of phosphorylated substrate to nonphosphorylated substrate and then calculating the amount of substrate phosphorylation at four different time points in the linear range and adjusting for the enzyme concentration. Kinetic parameters kcat and KM were calculated using Prism 9 assuming Michaelis-Menten kinetics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Edc3-mCherry and Dhh1-GFP Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For performing western analysis to estimate Edc3-mCherry, Dhh1-GFP levels in wild-type and Δsbp1 under unstressed, stressed, and recovery conditions, an aliquot of cells were collected by centrifuging at 3234 g for 1 min at room temperature for each condition while doing microscopy experiments. Cells were then lysed in 100 µl lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton-X100, 1 mM β-Mercaptoethanol, 1× cOmplete mini-EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, catalog no. 04693132001) and lysed by vortexing at 4 °C in bead-beater with glass beads. Unbroken cells and debris were removed by centrifugation at 2800 g for 5 min at 4 °C, followed by a 1-min spin at 15,800 g to remove any protein aggregates. 100 µg of total protein was loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels. Western analysis was performed using anti-mCherry antibody (Abcam, cat. ab167453), anti-GFP (Santa Cruz, catalog no. sc-9996; 1:1000 dilution), and anti-PGK1 (Abcam, catalog no. ab113687; dilution 1:1000). Western data analysis was done using Biorad ImageLab version 6.0.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Reverse Transcription and Real-Time PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNase treated RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Maxima Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher CAT# EP0741) with random hexamers unless otherwise noted. cDNA was then diluted 1:5 in ddH2O prior to qPCR. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen CAT# 4309155). Real time PCR was performed using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad CAT#1855195). All data was analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX software. End point PCR was performed using Taq polymerase at optimized cycle number, and products were run on 1%–2.5% Agarose gels with EtBr prior to imaging. Quantification of band intensity was performed using Image Lab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad). PCR Primer sequences can be found in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LPS Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LOS was extracted using the hot aqueous-phenol extraction as described by Davis and Goldberg (Davis & Goldberg, 2012 ), with the exception that LOS was extracted from mid-log phase cultures as described above. Twelve μl of each LOS extraction were loaded on Tricine SDS-PAGE (16%) for analysis (Lesse et al., 1990 (link)). Gels were stained using Pro-Q Emerald 300 lipopolysaccharide gel stain (Invitrogen). Gels were imaged with ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging system (Bio-Rad) and bands were quantified by densitometry using Image Lab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mitochondrial OXPHOS regulation in HIV latency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U1 and U937 cells (seeding density: 10 × 106 cells/well) were either left untreated for 48 h or treated with DON (12.5 µM for 48 h), prostratin (untreated for 24 h followed by 6 µM prostratin for 24 h), or DON + Prostratin (12.5 µM DON for 48 h and 6 µM prostratin for last 24 h). At 48 h, activation of HIV was measured by intracellular staining of HIV-1 core antigen-FITC, KC57 as mentioned earlier. Cells were harvested, washed in PBS, and centrifuged. Cell pellets were processed for mitochondrial extraction using Mitochondria Isolation Kit for Cultured cell (Thermo Scientific) using a reagent-based method as per manufacturers guidelines, followed by measuring OXPHOS protein levels using the total OXPHOS Human WB antibody cocktail (Abcam) with mitochondrial loading control VDAC using the antibody VDAC clone B-6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Relative protein quantification was performed using ImageLab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc), results analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test or unpaired t-test and visualized using GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 (significance p < 0.05). All laboratory experiments were performed in three independent replicates. Analysis was performed using unpaired t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test and visualized using GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 (significance p < 0.05). Uncropped and unedited blot images are included as Fig. S10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyse protein levels, cells were harvested in SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) lysis buffer and sonicated. Protein concentrations were determined using the Compat-Able Protein Assay Preparation Reagent Set (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #23215, Vienna, Austria) and the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #23227, Vienna, Austria) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. 20 µg of total protein per sample was separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto PVDF membranes, which were probed with anti-PPARγ (#23215, Cell Signaling), anti-FABP4 (#10004944, Cayman) or anti-DPP4 antibodies (#ab28340, Abcam). Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (#W4011, Promega) and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (#W4021, Promega) served as secondary antibodies. Signals were detected using a chemoluminescence detection system, and membranes were stained with Ponceau S for normalization to total protein. Densitometric analysis was done using ImageJ 1.51n (NIH, USA) and Image Lab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amounts of liver extracts containing 50 µg of proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to PVDF membranes (GE10600023 Amersham™ Hybond®® P Western blotting membranes, PVDF; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), as previously described [33 (link)]. Membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies (diluted 1:1000, according to producer instruction), listed in Supplementary Table S1, diluted in TBS containing 2% nonfat dry milk and 0.05% Tween, followed by incubation with appropriated horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (7074S, Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody, 7076S Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Denver, MA, USA) diluted in TBS containing 2% nonfat dry milk and 0.05% Tween (antibody dilution 1:5000 or 1:10,000). Chemiluminescence images of protein bands were detected using the Clarity Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad) and the ChemiDoc™ Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and quantified by densitometric image analysis software (Image Lab Version 6.0.1; Bio-Rad). Results were normalized to the densitometric values of internal loading controls, including GAPDH bands for total and cytosolic extracts, and histone H3 bands for nuclear extracts, and then expressed as fold of standard-diet-fed mice values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of OXPHOS Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM NaF, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, and 0.2% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Samples were prepared as described previously67 (link). Equal amounts of protein (15 μg) were separated in duplicate on an Any-kD TGX polyacrylamide gel (BioRad). Protein was transferred to a PVDF membrane (TransBlot Turbo, BioRad) and blocked for 24 hours at 4 °C in 5% blotting-grade blocker (BioRad). Blots were incubated in primary OXPHOS antibody (1:1000, 110413, Abcam) and then HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:5000, 31430, Invitrogen), each for 2 hours at room temperature. Bands of interest were compared against positive control (Rat Heart Mitochondria, Abcam) and all targets were probed on the same membrane, but required different exposure times using signal accumulation mode (ChemiDoc, BioRad). Volume intensity analysis of matched exposure duration for each target was completed using Image Lab Version 6.0.1 (BioRad). Total protein volume intensity obtained by UV activated Stain-Free imaging was used for data normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!