The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas version 11

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS version 11.0 is a software application developed by SAS Institute. It is designed to perform data analysis, statistical modeling, and business intelligence tasks. The core function of SAS version 11.0 is to provide users with a comprehensive platform for managing, analyzing, and visualizing data from various sources.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using sas version 11

1

Rootstock Evaluation for Fruit Quality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data obtained from this study were analyzed with SAS version 11.0. One‐way ANOVA was analyzed with different rootstock genotypes as the main effect and replication as a random effect in a completely randomized plot analysis to determine the differences among rootstocks in physical and chemical fruit properties. Means were separated using Duncan's multiple range test at a significance level of p < .05. Pearson correlation matrix method was used to study correlations among all rootstocks for the fruit physical and chemical properties evaluated. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to assess the interrelationships among genotypes. Moreover, rootstock means were used in multivariate analysis to generate two‐way similarity cluster diagrams based on rootstocks similarity and variation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Adjuvant UFT Therapy for Post-NAC Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As this trial was an exploratory study to evaluate the utility of continuous adjuvant UFT therapy in patients previously treated with NAC and there are currently no data from previous studies evaluating the tolerability of adjuvant UFT as a primary endpoint, we did not calculate a formal sample size using statistical data from previous comparable studies. Moreover, we considered that a number of cases were required for further exploratory analyses. Consequently, accrual of 50 patients was planned for this study. DFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 11.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). most frequent grade 3 AEs that were observed in 7% and 3% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 leucopenia and neutropenia were both observed in 3% of patients. We observed important common non-hematological toxicities of various grades, including anorexia, stomatitis, dysgeusia, rash, and skin hyperpigmentation. No grade 3 or greater non-hematological AEs or unexpected serious AEs were observed in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Radiographic Hip Osteoarthritis Prevalence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) are provided. Differences of age and BMI between men and women were examined by non-paired t-test. Differences in age, height, weight, and BMI among the urban, mountainous, and coastal communities were determined using one-way analysis of covariance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test. We used the chi square test to compare the prevalence of radiographic hip OA between men and women. Association of prevalence with age was determined by logistic-regression analysis after adjustment for BMI. Association of the variables such as age, BMI, gender, and community with radiographic hip OA was evaluated by multivariate logistic-regression analysis. Logistic-regression analyses were used to estimate OR and the associated 95% CI of K/L ¼ 2 and K/L ! 3 hip OA for pain compared with K/L ¼ 0/1 after adjustment for age, BMI, and community. Data analyses were performed using SAS version 11.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!