The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

One glo luciferase assay substrate

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

The ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate is a reagent designed to measure luciferase reporter gene activity. It provides a simple, sensitive, and rapid method for quantifying luminescence in cell-based assays.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using one glo luciferase assay substrate

1

In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of the aqueous extract was evaluated using a cell model that has been previously described [55 (link)]. Briefly, R3/1-Nf-κB cells were seeded (5000 cells/well) in a white 96-well plate (BRANDplates®, cell grade). Cells were pretreated with different concentrations of the extracts (1, 10, 50, and 100 µg/mL) for 18 h in complete medium (DMEM 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin). This process was followed by a 6 h stimulation with 10 ng/mL TNFα. To avoid components’ interference with the reading of the luciferase assay, cells were washed once with 100 µL of warm PBS before 50 µL of DMEM was added. Subsequently, 50 µL ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was directly added to the wells, followed by a luciferase measurement performed using a luminometer (Wallac Victor2 1420, Perkin-Elmer™ Life Science, Monza, Italy). Experiments were performed with biological and technical replicates and the results are shown as mean ± SD compared to untreated control cells. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05 was considered significant). The cell viability for all the concentrations tested in the anti-inflammatory assay was verified by MTT assay on R3/1-Nf-κB cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Luciferase Assay for NF-κB Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment, R3/1-NF-κBcells were washed twice with cold PBS followed by a freeze-thaw cycle with reporter lysis buffer (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) for complete cell lysis. After the freeze-thaw cycle, 100 µL ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was directly added to the wells, followed by a luciferase measurement performed using a luminometer (Wallac Victor2 1420, Perkin-Elmer™ Life Science, Monza, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Luciferase Emission Spectrum Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase emission spectrum was determined as follows: the medium in wells containing transfected cells was replaced with phosphate-buffered saline, and d-luciferin (Synchem, Germany) was added at a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Luciferase activity was measured using an IVIS Spectrum (Caliper, Alameda, CA, USA). The instrument stage was kept at 37 °C, and the imaging setup was field of view (FOV) C. Light output was measured using an open filter and a series of band pass filter (20 nm) ranging from 500 to 700 nm each for 5 s, 5 min after substrate addition to live cells. For in vitro fluorescence measurements, the instrument was set with an excitation filter of 570 nm and an emission filter of 640 nm. All the data are expressed in photon flux and analyzed with Living Image Software 4.0 (Caliper, Alameda, CA, USA). For the analysis of bioluminescence from cells transfected with pMNTurboLuc or MINI-pMNTurboLuc, cells were analyzed at different days after transfection using One-Glo luciferase assay substrate (Promega) and a plate luminometer (SpectraMax L luminometer, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NRF2 Activation by Apple Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thinned apple polyphenols (TAP) extract was evaluated for its ability to modulate the antioxidant response mediated by NRF2 activation using NRF2/ARE Responsive Luciferase Reporter HEK293 stable cell line (Signosis, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as previously described [46 (link)]. Briefly, HEK293 cells (10,000 cells/well) were treated with the extract (concentrations between 1 and 250 µg/mL). CDDO-Me 75 (bardoxolone methyl) 75 nM was used as a positive control [47 (link)]. After adding ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) (100 µL/well), luciferase measurement was performed with a luminometer (Wallac Victor2 1420, Perkin-Elmer™ Life Science, Monza, Italy). Experiments were carried out with biological and technical replicates; values are reported as mean ± SD compared to untreated control cells. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05 was considered significant) was used for the statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

mRNA Transfection and Luciferase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa and DF1 cells were seeded into 96-well clear bottom plates (Greiner). In vitro synthesized capped mRNAs were transfected using a Trans-IT- mRNA transfection kit according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the cells were incubated at 37 °C overnight. The luciferase signal was measured with Molecular Devices ID3 multifunctional plate reader using One Glo™ Luciferase Assay substrate (Promega). The signal for each construct was averaged from at least 24 wells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

NRF2/ARE Luciferase Assay for Antioxidant Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the evaluation of antioxidant activity, the NRF2/ARE Responsive Luciferase cell line HEK293 was used (Signosis, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cells were seeded in white 96-well plates (BRANDplates®, cell grade) with a density of 10,000 cells/well and subsequently treated with the PBJ as such, or after hydroalcoholic extraction under sonication, as previously described. The PBJ and stachydrine were added to complete medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin) in a concentration range of 1–250 µg/mL for 18 h. To avoid reading interference, the medium was removed and 50 µL of PBS were added to each well. Aliquots of 50 µL of ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) were added directly to the cells, and then the luciferase was measured using a luminometer (Wallac Victor2 1420, Perkin-Elmer™ Life Science, Monza, Italy). The experiments were performed with technical and biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Anti-inflammatory Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of the four extracts was evaluated using a cell model previously described [20 (link)]. Briefly, R3/1-Nf-κB cells were seeded (5000 cells/well) in a white 96-well plate (BRANDplates®, cell grade). Cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of the extracts (1–250 µg/mL) for 18 h in complete medium (DMEM 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin). This process was followed by a 6 h stimulation with 10 ng/mL TNFα. To avoid components’ interference with the reading of the luciferase assay, cells were washed once with 100 µL of warm PBS and 100 µL of DMEM was then added. Subsequently, 100 µL ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was directly added to the wells, followed by a luciferase measurement performed using a luminometer (Wallac Victor2 1420, Perkin-Elmer™ Life Science, Monza, Italy). Experiments were performed with biological and technical replicates and the results are shown as mean ± SD compared to untreated control cells. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05 was considered significant). The cell viability for all the concentrations tested in the anti-inflammatory assay was verified by MTT assay on R3/1-Nf-κB cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Anti-Inflammatory Activity of TAP Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of the TAP extract was evaluated by using a cell model previously described [27 (link)]. Briefly, R3/1 NF-κB cells (5000 cells/well) were pre-treated for 18 h with different concentrations of the extract (1–250 µg/mL) in complete medium (DMEM 10% FBS, 1% l-glutamine, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin). Rosiglitazone 10 µM was used as a positive control [27 (link)]. Then, cells were stimulated for 6 h with 10 ng/mL IL-1α, and for 6 and 24 h with 10 ng/mL TNF-α. Luciferase measurements was performed with a luminometer (Wallac Victor2 1420, Perkin-Elmer™ Life Science, Monza, Italy) after adding 100 µL of ONE-Glo™ Luciferase Assay Substrate (purchased from Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Experiments were carried out with biological and technical replicates; values are reported as mean ± SD compared to untreated control cells. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05 was considered significant) was used for the statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HCV-specific MAIT cell cytotoxicity assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Huh-7-Lunet-HLA-A2+ Luc-ubi-neo Con1–expressing cells or control Lunet-HLA-A2- Luc-ubi-neo Con1–expressing cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in a 96-well plate and cultured overnight in complete DMEM without selection. HCV NS3 TCR–redirected MAIT cells were added at indicated ratios and cocultured for 24 hours. Medium was replaced with ONE-Glo Luciferase assay substrate (Promega), and bioluminescence was quantified using Living Image Software version 4.2 on the IVIS Spectrum instrument (Caliper Life Sciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Prdm1 Promoter Luciferase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The promoter region of Prdm1 from −2,052 bp to approximately +207 bp (Tunyaplin et al., 2000 (link)) was PCR amplified using template DNA of CH12F3 (T. Honjo, Kyoto University) cells (Muramatsu et al., 2000 (link)) and cloned into pGL4.32 using restriction enzyme sites KpnI and HindIII. The reporter plasmid (4 µg) and pCMV-DsRed (1 µg), an internal control, were transiently transfected into CH12F3, which had been knocked down by shLacZ or shStat1, using 4D-Neucleofactor System (Lonza) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The transfection efficiency was ∼7–14%, as indicated by DsRed-positive cells using flow cytometry. After transfection for 24 h, the cells were stimulated with or without 5 µg/ml LPS for an additional 6 or 12 h before being harvested. Luciferase activity was measured by the ONE-Glo Luciferase Assay Substrate (Promega) with an EnVision 2103 Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to percentage of DsRed-positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!