The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using plan apochromat 20x 0.8 objective

1

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were taken on a lsm 700 confocal microscope (Zeiss) equipped with 405 nm (5 mW fiber output), 488 nm (10 mW fiber output), 555 nm (10 mW fiber output) and 639 nm (5 mW fiber output) diode lasers, a main dichroic beam splitter URGB and a gradient secondary beam splitter for lsm 700 using a 10x EC Plan-Neofluar (10x/0.3) or a 20x Plan-Apochromat (20x/0.8) objective (Zeiss). Image acquisition was done with ZEN 2010 (Zeiss), and image dimensions were 1024×1024 or 2048×2048 pixels with an image depth of 8, 12 or 16 bit. Two times averaging was applied during image acquisition. Laser power and gain were adjusted to avoid saturation of single pixels. Adjustment of brightness/contrast, changing of artificial colors (LUT), and maximum projections of Z-stack images were done in Fiji/Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Visualization of Progesterone Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described [31 (link)] with modifications. Briefly, cells were grown to 50–60% confluence in chamber slides (Lab-Tek, Hatfield, PA) followed by methanol fixation for 10 min at 20 °C. Serum free blocking buffer (Dako, Carpinteria, CA), and the cells incubated with rabbit anti-progesterone receptor antibody overnight at 4 °C. Cells were treated with MitoTracker Deep Red (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene OR) and visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies). After DAPI counterstaining, a cover slip was placed on slides with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were obtained using the Zeiss Imager M2 with a 20X Plan-APOCHROMAT 20X/0.8 objective and a 100X EC PLANNEOFLUOR 100X/1.3 oil objective. The Alexa Fluor 488 fluorophore was observed through filter set 38 1031-346 with an excitation of BP 470/40, beamsplitter of FT 495, and emission spectrum of BP 525/50. Differential interference contrast images were collected using DIC M27 condensers. The Alexa Fluor 488 fluorophore was excited for 500 ms prior to capturing each image using an Axio Cam MR3 camera. All analysis was performed using AxioVision SE64 4.9.1 SP1 software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy 2006–2013).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescent Staining of Spleen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens were prepared for staining as previously described (34 (link)). Slides were stained with a primary antibody cocktail of CD169-FITC (MOMA-1; MCA947F; Bio Rad Laboratories; diluted 1:50), IgM-Biotin (II/41; 553436; BD Biosciences; diluted 1:35), and CD1d (1B1; 123551; BioLegend; diluted 1:200) in serum blocking buffer. Slides were secondary stained with anti-FITC-A488 (polyclonal; A11090; Life Technologies; diluted 1:100) and streptavidin-Hilyte555 (60666; Anaspec; diluted 1:20) in serum blocking buffer. Slides were imaged on a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 at room temperature with acquisition software Zen v2.0.0.0 (Blue Edition) using tiling and z-stacking. Images were taken with a 20X Plan-Apochromat 20x/0.8 objective (420650–9901; Zeiss) and an Axiocam 506 mono digital camera (Zeiss). Image files were analyzed with ImageJ v1.52k (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were taken on a lsm 700 confocal microscope (Zeiss) equipped with 405 nm (5 mW fiber output), 488 nm (10 mW fiber output), 555 nm (10 mW fiber output) and 639 nm (5 mW fiber output) diode lasers, a main dichroic beam splitter URGB and a gradient secondary beam splitter for lsm 700 using a 10x EC Plan-Neofluar (10x/0.3) or a 20x Plan-Apochromat (20x/0.8) objective (Zeiss). Image acquisition was done with ZEN 2010 (Zeiss), and image dimensions were 1024×1024 or 2048×2048 pixels with an image depth of 8, 12 or 16 bit. Two times averaging was applied during image acquisition. Laser power and gain were adjusted to avoid saturation of single pixels. Adjustment of brightness/contrast, changing of artificial colors (LUT), and maximum projections of Z-stack images were done in Fiji/Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Confocal Imaging of Immunofluorescence Signals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal imaging was performed using a LSM 700 confocal microscope (Zeiss) equipped with 405 nm (5 mW fiber output), 488 nm (10 mW fiber output), 555 nm (10 mW fiber output) and 639 nm (5 mW fiber output) diode lasers, a main dichroic beam splitter URGB and a gradient secondary beam splitter for LSM 700 using a 10x EC Plan-Neofluar (10x/0.3) or a 20x Plan-Apochromat (20x/0.8) objective (Zeiss, Munich, Germany). Image acquisition was done with ZEN 2010 (Zeiss), and image dimensions were 1024 × 1024 pixels with an image depth of 16 bit. Two times averaging was applied during image acquisition. Laser power and gain were adjusted to avoid saturation of single pixels. All images were taken using identical microscope settings based on the secondary antibody control staining. The immunofluorescence signals were quantified by using Image J (v.1.53c; NIH, USA). After converting the images to grey scale, immune-positive areas were quantified after defining a signal threshold, which was applied for all samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Cytoskeletal Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Section or whole mount staining slides were imaged on a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 microscope with Apotome.2 attachment, PlanAPOCHROMAT 20X/0.8 objective or a Zeiss 780 upright confocal with a 20X/0.8 Plan-Apochromat objective and acquired using Zen software (Zeiss). Images were analyzed using FIJI software. Quantifications of fluorescence intensity of cortical F-actin, Myosin IIC and α-18 were measured for their plot profiles by drawing lines across the junction, then aligned the maxima and trimmed the ends to yield the final plot. Quantification of Ki67+ cells in Control, Arhgef11Villi and Arhgef11Crypt mice were performed by measuring numbers of Ki67+ cells and total cells per crypt. Identification of whether cells were located within the villar or crypt compartment was identified by tissue morphology. All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software and Microsoft Excel. Data were judged to be statistically significant when p value < 0.05 by two-tailed paired or unpaired Student’s t test, asterisks denote statistical significance (ns = not significant, *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001), as described in individual figure legend. Where no significance is indicated, p values were > 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FM4-64 Labeling and Imaging of Induced Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed the experiments after consolidation of the method papers 69 (link), 71. Four to six week old cultures of human direct induced neurons were loaded with 10 μM FM4–64 (Invitrogen) for 2 min in saline solution containing 170 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 0.4 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM NaHCO3, 1.2 mM Na2SO4, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 5 mM glucose, 20 mM N-tris(hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-aminoethane-sulfonic acid, pH 7.4) supplemented with 60 mM KCl. The cells were rinsed with saline solution only and then incubated with 10 μM FM4–64 in just saline solution. The cells were washed three times with saline solution for a total of 5 min, followed by a wash for 1 min with 1 mM ADVASEP-7 (Sigma-Aldrich) in saline solution. FM imaging was performed at the LSM 710 confocal microscope (Zeiss) with a Plan-Apochromat 20X/0.8 objective with image taken every 5 s at 25°C. A one-minute baseline was recorded, followed by stimulation with 60 mM KCl in saline solution for 4 min. Cells were excited at 558 nm and the emission measured at 734 nm. Images were analyzed blinded in Fiji using the “plot z-axis profile” plug-in. We analyzed potential functional nerve terminals located along the GFP-positive cell (Supplementary Fig. 2). The FM4–64 signal was determined by F = (F1–B1)/(F0–B0). Signal was normalized to mean fluorescence intensity measured at baseline condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Viral Protein and Synaptic Marker Overlap

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vibratome sections (100 μm thick) from virus-injected animals were immunolabeled with antibodies against mCherry, which was expressed from the virus, as well as antibodies against the mossy fiber marker, ZnT3. CellProfiler (Version 2.1.0) software was used to quantify the degree of overlap between mCherry and ZnT3. The average amount of overlap was 70%.
Primary antibodies: rat BrdU (AbD Serotec, MCA2060GA, 1:500), rabbit GFP (Invitrogen, A11122, 1:300), rabbit Complexin-1 (Proteintech, 10246–2–AP, 1:300), mouse GFAP (G6171, 1:500), mouse Nsf-1 (MA1–12435, 1:300) and rabbit Syn3 (OSS00018W, 1:300) from Thermo Scientific, guinea pig Iba1 (234 004, 1:500), mouse Syt1 (105 011, 1:300), guinea pig ZnT3 (197 004, 1:1000) from Synaptic Systems.
Secondary antibodies. Antibodies (all obtained from Jackson Laboratory, donkey anti-guinea pig IgG (H+L) ML, #706-225-148 and 706-175-148; donkey anti-mouse IgG (H+L) ML, #715-225-151, 715-165-151, and 715-175-151; donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) ML, #711-225-152, 711-165-152, and 711-175-152 were diluted 1:400. Confocal scans were carried out using a LSM 510 Imager Z.1 microscope (Zeiss) using Plan-Apochromat 63X/1.4 and EC Plan-Neofluar 40X/1.30 oil immersion objective lenses and four excitation laser lines. Tile scans were performed using a LSM 710 confocal microscope (Zeiss) with a Plan-Apochromat 20X/0.8 objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Vascular Development in Mouse Eyes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eyes from Flk1-H2B::YFP+/tg mice (E12.5 to P10) were enucleated and immediately placed on a 35 mm glass bottom petri dish (MatTek) with the corneal surface facing the glass. The eyes were then imaged en face using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope and Plan-Apochromat 20X/0.8 objective. Using LSM Image Examiner software and either the rim of the ciliary body in the embryos or the postnatal iris as a guide, the PM within each image was cropped and its area measured. This was followed by manual counting of every Flk1-H2B::YFP+ cell within the entire PM. Statistically significant differences (t-test) between varying time points were determined for the total number of cells per PM and the number of cells per PM area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessment of Mouse Pancreatic Islet Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Islet cell viability of mouse pancreatic islets and pseudo-islets was examined upon 1.5 mM STZ treatment for 24 h, using the LIVE-DEAD Viability-Cytotoxicity Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Following treatment, whole islets were incubated protected from light for 1 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 with 10 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (DNA stain), 2 μM Calcein AM (live cells), and 4 μM Ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1, dead cells) in KRH buffer supplemented with 0.1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 mM glucose (Sigma-Aldrich) to co-stain cell nuclei, as well as viable and dead cells. Afterward, Z-stack images of the stained islets were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 710 coupled to an Axio Observer.Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH) equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 20x/0.8 objective or Zeiss ApoTome (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH) equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 103/0.45 objective. All images were analyzed using Fiji (ImageJ) image analysis software and cell death was quantified by using the semi-automated quantification macro as previously published by Scholz and colleagues.64 (link) The area of dead (EthD-1-positive) cells of each islet was normalized to the whole islet cell area (Hoechst-positive).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!