The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism graph pad 7

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in Australia, United States

Prism Graph Pad 7 is a data analysis and graphing software used for scientific research. It enables users to create various types of graphs and charts to visualize and analyze their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

13 protocols using prism graph pad 7

1

Effects of Hypocaloric Diet on CETP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as median ± standard error of mean (SEM) unless otherwise reported. Since the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test revealed non-normal distribution, the results were analyzed by non-parametric tests. The effects of the hypo-caloric diet were analyzed by paired comparison (values before vs. after the intervention) using Wilcoxon tests. Two-tailed p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed by using StatistiXL software (version 1.5; StatistiXL, Western Australia) and Prism Graphpad 7. A Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis was used as appropriate to define correlations between each cytokine level and CETP quantification, and also relations among improvement in glucose metabolism (glycemia reduction, insulin reduction, HOMA-IR reduction) and CEPT levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data collected from the various experiments were entered into the Prism Graph pad 7. We used one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test and two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test as appropriate. Data were mainly expressed as Mean ± SD with the symbol indicating statistical significance at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stem Cell Differentiation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed using Prism Graph Pad 7 and the statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, or where indicated, two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the effect of two differentiation mixes while two-way ANOVA was used to compare the effect of rhTGFβ1 on different differentiation time points expressed as mean ± SD with statistical significance being accepted at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Unpaired t-test with Welch's Correction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the results of the above experiments was performed using two-tailed unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction in Prism graphpad 7. In all statistical analyses, P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant and were presented as follows: *: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05; **: 0.001 < P ≤ 0.01; ***: 0.01 <P ≤ 0.001 and ****: 0.001 <P ≤ 0.0001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the experiments were conducted in triplicate. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) by Prism Graph Pad 7 software. Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests was used for the determination of differences between means at a significant level (P < 0.05). Furthermore, MeV (Multi Experiment Viewer) version 4.9.0. and ClustVis a web tool (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/) were used for Heatmap and Principal component analysis (PCA) respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Prism Graph Pad 7 Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data plotting and statistical analysis were done using Prism Graph Pad 7 (Appendix Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Detailed Protocol for Polymer Synthesis and Functional Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated at least twice in each cell model (N≥6). PRISM GraphPad 7 was used to perform all the statistical analyses presented. Two group comparisons were analyzed for variation and significance using a two-tailed, type 1 t-test and p values lower than 0.05 were considered significant and symbolized by an asterisk in the graphs. One-way or Two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test was used to analyze the relationships when comparing multiple variables, with p values lower than 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. All data shown are representative of means ± S.D. of triplicate results unless otherwise specified.
Additional information about polymer synthesis, primers used for qRT-PCR (Supplemental table S1, S2 and S3), cloning (Supplemental table S4), lentiviral constructs (Supplemental Table S5), antibodies (Supplemental table S6), miRNA array resuls (Supplemental table S7) can be found in the supplemental materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Depression, Brain, and Behavior Relationships

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were conducted using Prism GraphPad 7 and R-studio. We conducted all correlational analysis in Prism 7 computing two-tailed Pearson correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals. Unlike our previous work, we did not choose an arbitrary cutoff to be used for a binary classification of “healthy” and “depressed” as we did not recruit a clinically assessed sample. Instead, multiple linear regressions were used to assess the influence of Beck Depression Inventory-II (on a continuous basis) on relationships between behavior, fMRI, and diffusion measures and were conducted in R-studio. Bootstrap analysis were conducted in R-studio using the Boot package with 1000 repetitions. 95% confidence intervals are reported. Statistical values were considered significant at an alpha level of 0.05. Since we only tested targeted hypotheses and used a priori planned comparisons, correction for multiple comparisons was not necessary (Rothman, 1990 (link); Saville, 1990 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Analysis of Ingredient Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA procedure in Prism Graph Pad 7.0 and Tukey tests were used for mean comparisons. Paired t-test was used to compare the AIPD and TIPD values for each ingredient at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were statistically analyzed using Prism Graph Pad 7.0 software (San Diego, CA, USA). Corresponding tests were indicated in the legend of each figure, as well as the number of independent experiments (N) used to estimate the mean and standard error of the mean. p values (>0.05: ns, ≤0.05: *, ≤0.01: **, ≤0.001: *** and ≤0.0001: ****) were obtained with a confidence interval of 95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!