The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using sybr green mixture

1

Quantitative Analysis of nifH Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine the abundances of the nifH gene, a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was performed using primer pairs 338F/518R as an internal control, and PolF/PolR as a quantification primer pair [49 (link)]. About 50 ng DNA, 1 μL primer pairs (5 pM), and 10 μL of 2 × SYBR Green mixture (Roche, Switzerland) were present in the final reaction volume of 20 μL. Each DNA sample had three technical duplicates and was incubated for 10 minutes at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 95°C and 1 minute at 60°C [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of nifH Gene Abundance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the relative abundance of the nifH gene, a quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) assay was performed. The primer pair of PolF–PolR was used for the quantification of the nifH gene and the primer pair of 338F − 518R for the 16 S rRNA was used as an internal control (Poly et al., 2001 (link); Yang et al., 2012 ). The final 20 μl reaction volume contains 50 ng DNA (∼1 μl), 1 μl primer pair (5 pM) and 10 μl of 2× SYBR Green mixture (Roche, Switzerland). Each group contained three biological replicates (i.e., three DNA samples), and each DNA sample contained three technical duplicates. The PCR program contained 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles consisting of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min (Wen et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying CUG RNA Expression in Drosophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from ten flies per genotype using Trizol reagent (Sigma). DNase I treatment and reverse transcription were performed as previously reported (Llamusi et al., 2013 (link)). To quantify the expression of CUG RNA, the common SV40 terminator in the pUAST vector was used as target of the primers (F: 5′-GGAAAGTCCTTGGGGTCTTC-3′, R: 5′-GGAACTGATGAATGGGAGCA-3′). Expression levels were normalized to the reference gene rp49 (F: 5′-ATGACCATCCGCCCAGCATAC-3′, R: 5′-ATGTGGCGGGTGCGCTTGTTC-3′) using the SYBR® Green mixture (Roche) under 2−ΔΔCt method. For each genotype, three biological samples were used and three technical replicates were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Host Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from LX-2 cells using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Venlo, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR testing was performed using the LightCycler system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and 5 μL of SYBR Green mixture (Roche), 2 μL of purified cDNA, and 1 μL of forward and reverse primer were used for PCR amplification. The primer sequences used were GAPDH (forward primer: 5’-agccacatcgctcagacac-3’, reverse primer: 5’-gcccaatacgaccaaatcc-3’), IL-1β (forward primer: 5’-GCCAGTGAAATGATGGCTTAT-3’, reverse primer: 5’-ggtcctggaaggagcactt -3’), and PKR (forward primer: 5’-AGCACACTCGCTTCTGAATC-3’, reverse primer: 5’-CTGGTCTCAGGATCATAATC-3’). Relative mRNA expression levels of target host genes were defined by dividing their values by the amount of GAPDH mRNA, which were then evaluated by statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells or mouse tissues using RNeasy purification kit (Qiagen). One microgram RNA of each sample was reverse transcribed with a cDNA reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen) and subjected to Q-PCR by using SYBR green mixture (Roche) with Roche Light-Cycler Q-PCR System. Primers were purchased from Qiagen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Allelic Expression Analysis by RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment with RNase-free DNase I (Life Technologies, 180868-015), first-strand cDNA was generated by reverse transcription with Superscript-IV (Life Technologies, 18090050) using random primers and 500 ng of RNA. Then, cDNA was amplified by real-time PCR with the SYBR Green mixture (Roche) using a LightCycler R 480II (Roche) apparatus. The relative expression level was quantified with the 2-delta Ct method that gives the fold change variation in gene expression normalized to the geometrical mean of the expression of the housekeeping genes Gapdh, Tbp, and Gus. The primer sequences are in Table S2.
For allelic analysis, for each locus of interest, the parental allele origin of expression was assigned following direct sequencing of the cognate RT-PCR product that encompassed a strain-specific SNP (SNP details in Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of miR-766 and PDCD5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from tissues and cells by using TRIZOL (Invitrogen, USA). Then, total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by using Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoScientific, USA). qRT-PCR (Bio-Rad, USA) was performed by using SYBR Green Mixture (Roche, Switzerland). Primers used for qRT-PCR were shown as follows: miR-766 F: 5′-GCGGCCGCTATACACAGAGGATTGCTTAG-3′, R: 5′-ACGCGTCAGGCAACAGATTTC-3′; U6 F: 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACATATACT-3′, R: 5′-ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTC-3′; PDCD5 F: 5′-CAACAGGAAGCAAAGCAC-3′, R: 5′-GATCTTAACTTCTGCCTAGAC-3′; GAPDH F: 5′-GACGGCCGCATCTTCTTGT-3′, R: 5′-CACACCGACCTTCACCATTTT-3′. The primers were synthetized by Sangon Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The relative expression of miR-766 and PDCD5 was normalized to U6 and GAPDH, respectively, and calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
siRNA transfections were carried out with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) and all plasmid transfections were performed with Polyethylenimine (PEI, Bender, Austria) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent kit (Invitrogen, USA). cDNA was reverse-transcribed from the total RNA using the First Strand Reverse Transcription Kit (Fermentas, K1691). qRT-PCR was performed on an ABI 7500 Real time PCR system using a SYBR Green Mixture (Roche, 4913914001).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RT-PCR Analysis of Seedling Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RT and RT-PCR were performed as described previously (39 (link)). Leaves of seedlings at 10 days old were used for RNA isolation, and oligo(dT) primers (Promega) were used for RT. The CFX real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad) and SYBR Green mixture (Roche) were used for RT-PCR. The relative expression of the genes was measured relative to UBIQUITIN 10 or the input. Data file S1 lists the primer sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Real-Time PCR of Reverse Transcribed RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was reverse transcribed as described before and amplified by real-time PCR with a SYBR Green mixture (Roche) using a LightCycler® 480II (Roche) apparatus. For each condition, analyses were repeated four times, each in duplicate. The primer sequences are in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!