The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using rat anti mouse cd11b

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Neurological Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed in the same manner as described by Boutin et al. [31 (link)]. Sequential sections of tissue, adjacent to those used for autoradiography, were stained either for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and CD11b antigen (Ox42) or for GFAP and neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN). Sections were fixed in 10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 1 h, washed in 6 × 5 min PBS, and then incubated for 20 min in diluent (PBS with 5% normal horse serum and 0.1% Triton X-100). Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in diluent (rabbit anti-cow GFAP, 1 : 1,000, DakoCytomation; mouse anti-rat CD11b, 1 : 1,000, Serotec; mouse anti-mouse NeuN, 1 : 1,000, Chemicon) and then washed in 3 × 5 min PBS. Incubation in secondary antibodies was for 1 h at RT (Alexa Fluor 594 nm goat anti-mouse IgG, 1 : 500; Alexa Fluor 488 nm goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1 : 500 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen)) and then sections were washed again in 3 × 5 min PBS. Sections were mounted with an antiadherent solution (Citifluor, UK). Sections incubated without primary antibodies served as negative controls.
Immunofluorescence images were obtained with an Olympus BX-41 microscope equipped with a digital camera (QImaging, Canada) at 10x magnification, acquired with Image-Pro software. Image fusion was performed with MCID image analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical analysis of brain injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining was performed at day 7 after reperfusion. The animal was terminally anesthetized and sacrificed by decapitation. The brain was removed, frozen, and cut into 5-μm-thick sections in a cryostat. Sections were fixed in acetone (− 20 °C) during 2 min, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and saturated with a solution of bovine serum albumine (BSA) 5%/Tween 0.5% in PBS during 15 min at room temperature, and incubated during 1 h at room temperature with primary antibodies in a solution of BSA (5%)/Tween (0.5%) in PBS. The section was stained for CD11b with mouse anti-rat CD11b (1:300; Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA) and for TSPO with a rabbit anti-rat TSPO (NP155, 1:1000). Sections were washed (3 × 10 min) in PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 350 goat anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Madrid, Spain, 1:1000) in BSA 5%/Tween 0.5% in PBS, washed again (3 × 10 min) in PBS, and mounted with a prolong antifade kit in slices (Molecular Probes Life Technologies, Madrid). Standardized images acquisition was performed with an Axio Observer Z1 (Zeiss, Le Pecq, France) equipped with a motorized stage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimarker Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells used for immunofluorescence were fixed for 30 minutes at room temperature in 4%PFA, while slides were incubated for 5 minutes in PBS to remove residual OCT. After washing with PBS, samples were blocked in serum of the host of the secondary antibody (5% serum and 0.3% BSA in PBS with 0.2% Triton-X 100), and then incubated overnight with rabbit anti-mouse Iba1 (1:500, Wako), mouse anti-mouse iNOS (1:500, BD Biosciences), mouse anti-mouse Arg-1 (1:500, BD Biosciences), rat anti-mouse CD206 (1:50, R&D Systems), rat anti-mouse CD86 (1:50, Millipore), rat anti-mouse CD11b (1:200, Serotec), and rabbit anti-mouse p-Stat6 (1:100, Cell Signaling) in 0.3% BSA in PBS with 0.2% Triton-X 100. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with fluorescence-conjugated FITC or Cy3 goat anti-rabbit or rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody and Streptavidin-conjugated Cy3 (to detect bound biotinylated tuftsin) for 1 hour at room temperature, washed 3 times with PBS, and mounted using Fluoromount-G with DAPI (Southern Biotech, USA). For experiments where two markers were used for staining, (e.g. Iba1/iNOS or Iba1/Arg1), yellow fluorescence is indicative of double-positive signal. DAPI was included in images as an indicator of cell density in lesion areas. The cells were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope or a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing Kidney Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cells were isolated from both normal and diseased kidneys using enzyme-digestion and analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described.47 After permeabilization, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse F4/80 (eBioscience) or rat anti-mouse CD11b (Serotec) followed by Cy5-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (Millpore), PE-conjugated anti-α-SMA (R & D, Minneapolis, MN, USA), FITC-labeled rat anti-mouse CD206 (Serotec) or rabbit anti-CX3CR1(Prosci Inc). Collagen I was stained with rabbit anti-mouse collagen I (Millpore) followed by the Cy5 labeled goat anti-rabbit Ig (Invitrogen). Cells incubated with isotype-matched irrelevant control antibodies and unstained cells were used as negative controls. Cells were detected by a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using Cellquest software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phenotypic Analysis of Myeloid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anti-Mouse F4/80 antigen (PE-Cy7 labeled) and anti-mouse CD11c (PE labeled) were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). A rat anti-mouse CD206 (Alexa Fluor® 647 labeled), a rat anti-mouse CD301 (Alexa Fluor® 647 labeled), A rat anti-mouse Ly6B.2 Alloantigen (Alexa Fluor® 700 labeled) and a rat anti-mouse CD11b (Alexa Fluor® 647 labeled) were from AbD Serotec (Raleigh, NC). Recombinant mouse IL-10 was from eBioscience (San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!