The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Disk diffusion

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

The disk diffusion method is a laboratory technique used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms. It involves placing a paper disk impregnated with an antimicrobial agent on a culture medium inoculated with a test microorganism. The size of the zone of inhibition around the disk is measured and used to determine the susceptibility or resistance of the microorganism to the antimicrobial agent.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using disk diffusion

1

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Acinetobacter Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Malaysian Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Register (approval no. NMRR-14-1650-23625-IIR). A. baumannii AC1633 and A. nosocomialis AC1530 were isolated from Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia in 2016 and 2015, respectively. Species identification of both isolates was performed by sequencing of the rpoB gene as previously described (13 (link), 71 (link)). Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of both isolates were determined using a panel of 22 antibiotics recommended for Acinetobacter spp. (26 (link)) and by disk diffusion (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar, except for colistin and polymyxin B, which were determined by obtaining the MIC values by the agar diffusion method (25 (link)). Carbapenem resistance was validated by determining the MIC values for imipenem, meropenem and doripenem using M.I.C. Evaluator strips (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). Results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (72 ). Production of metalo-β-lactamases was determined using the Etest MBL kit (bioMérieux, La Balme-les-Grottes, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for A. baumannii isolates was carried out according to the standard disk diffusion method (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), during which, the following antibiotics were tested: aminoglycosides (gentamicin [10 µg disk], amikacin [30 µg disk]), carbapenems (imipenem [10 µg disk], meropenem [10 µg disk]), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin [5 µg disk], levofloxacin [5 µg disk]), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [23.75/1.25 µg disk] and colistin [10 µg disk]. With the exception of colistin, interpretation of the results was carried out according to the standards and breakpoints of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) v. 11.0 [30 ]. Results indicating “susceptible, increased exposure (I)” were grouped with and reported as susceptible (S) [31 ]. Susceptibility to colistin was assessed according to the provisional breakpoints, as advised by Galani et al. [32 (link)]. Classification of the isolates as MDR (i.e. resistant to at least one agent in ≥3 antibiotic groups) was based on the recommendations of Magiorakos et al. [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibilities to ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem and meropenem were tested for all E. coli isolates by disk diffusion (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and interpretation was done according to EUCAST criteria (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints; v7.1). The phylogenetic group of the E. coli isolates was determined by a PCR-based assay [72 (link)]. The presence of β-lactamase genes (blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M-group-1-2-9, and blaCMY) was confirmed by PCR and sequencing as previously described [73 (link), 74 (link)]; only CMY-2 positive isolates were included in the present study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Acinetobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility to several antibiotics was assessed by disk diffusion (Oxoid Ltd., Hants, UK) [12 ,15 ]. The antibiotics included meropenem (10 µg, MEM), imipenem (10 µg, IMP), ertapenem (10 µg, ETP), ceftazidime (30 µg, CAZ), ceftriaxone (30 µg, CRO), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.25 µg, SXT). Susceptibilities for MEM, IMP, CAZ, CRO, and SXT were interpreted according to CLSI M100 2020 breakpoints [13 ]. ETP did not have a defined breakpoint for Acinetobacter spp.; therefore, we used the breakpoint for Gram-negative Haemophilus influenzae [13 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confirmed S. aureus strains were sent for antimicrobial susceptibility test by disk diffusion (Oxoid) according to the guideline of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2022). The antimicrobial compounds included ampicillin (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), linezolid (30 μg), penicillin (10 units), rifampicin (5 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg), with S. aureus ATCC 25923 enrolled as the control strain. Cefoxitin was used to confirm potential methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for penicillin, vancomycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and chloramphenicol resistance was conducted on all isolates by disk diffusion (Oxoid Limited, Nepean, ON, Canada) at the Alberta Public Health Laboratory. Interpretations of zone diameter breakpoints were made according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (62 ). The numbers of nonsusceptible isolates interpreted as intermediate and resistant were analyzed for each antimicrobial agent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identifying Acinetobacter Species and Antibiotic Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of genomic species of Acinetobacter was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-offlight mass spectrometry, MALDI-TOF MS (MALDI Biotyper CA system; Bruker Daltonics, Madrid, Spain). Detection of bla OXA-51 was performed by PCR, 7 (link) whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the SpeciesFinder 1.2 tool (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ SpeciesFinder/). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the Microscan Neg MIC Panel, Type 44 (Beckman Coulter, Inc, Madrid, Spain). Imipenem and meropenem susceptibility testing was performed by Etest (LioChem Inc, Madrid, Spain) and disk diffusion (Oxoid, Madrid, Spain) in Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Oxoid). Susceptibility to colistin was tested by microdilution using the UMIC kit (Biocentric; Bandol, France).
The isolate was genotyped by PFGE using the restriction enzyme ApaI, 8 multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed according to the Institut Pasteur scheme (https://pubmlst. org/abaumannii/) and using WGS (see below) and the MLST 1.8 tool (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!